On Tuesday 24 November 2009 22:49:53 Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 24.11.2009 22:37, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> >>> We came up with several possible courses of action. First, we
> >>> acknowledge that abrt team is working on improving duplicate detection,
> >>> but Matej noted that this is intrinsicall
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 02:52:05 you wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 09:39 +0200, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> > > > I've installed F-12 beta on my new laptop with ati radeon hd 4570
> > > > graphic card, I was going to file new bug. With kms enabled,
> > > > everything is really slw, with 'nomodes
On Wednesday 21 October 2009 23:27:31 Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 15:16 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
> > Today I upgrade my Fedora to Fedora 12 Beta, It looks very well. But I
> > found ATi display driver does not run well.
> >
> >
> > My display card is Sapphire HD3650 with 256MB
On Friday 09 October 2009 16:36:34 Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2009, Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I've got quite simple question from dovecot's upstream: Why do we have rw
> > access on mails for mail group? Why /var/mail/ files have 0660
On Friday 09 October 2009 15:31:45 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> The most important question is: Is there anything that requires these files
> can be read and written by mail group?
Well, I already know one, cyrus-imapd most probably requires mail rw. Is there
anything else?
--
fedora-deve
s
everything still works.
useradd command comes from shadow-utils and fedora contains no patch changing
permissions to 0660.
The most important question is: Is there anything that requires these files can
be read and written by mail group?
If you have any info regarding this, please share.
On Wednesday 29 July 2009 15:16:20 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 29.07.09 12:33, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > This reminds me your note:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://tango.0pointer.de/pipermail/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-July/004519
> This reminds me your note:
>
>
> https://tango.0pointer.de/pipermail/pulseaudio-discuss/2009-July/004519.htm
>l
>
> PA does not make use of hardware mixing. And I don't plan to change
> that. It's obsolete technology. CPUs these days come with extensions
> such as MMX or SSE preci
> Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 02:08:55PM +0200, Ondřej Vašík wrote:
> >> Stefan Assmann wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering why there's no $HOME/bin directory and $HOME/bin not
> >>> mentioned in the $PATH variable. Any particular reason not to have that
> >>> by
On Wednesday 08 July 2009 16:30:56 Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Christoph Höger on 07/08/2009 09:21 AM wrote:
> > how do I do that?
I guess you can use Delete/Unpush/Revoke request or something like that in
bodhi web interface.
> Since you have not submitted it for "stable" I do not see any prob
On Monday 29 June 2009 12:48:11 David wrote:
> Re the discussion at
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg01991.html
>
> The below suggestion tries to satisfy all parties:
> - it presents a neutral default
> - it presents a simple choice for newbie who doesnt know what a
On Friday 26 June 2009 20:50:58 Jon Stanley wrote:
> ...
>18:42:08 Sweeping them under the carpet is bad.
>18:42:16 I also hate how x86_64 is being hidden.
>18:42:21 presenting them all on the top page is also fail.
>18:42:22 and I defer to her on design decisions, since I
>couldn't design my w
> > What if upstream answers: ok, thanks for bug report, please try this
> > patch... or I've fixed it in repo, please try svn snapshot, if it's
> > fixed for you?
>
> In that case we can roll a fixed package (e.g. as a scratch build). (If
> upstream says "try a current snapshot, it should be fixe
> 1. How did you find out about Fedora Test Days?
fedora-devel-list
> 2. Was sufficient documentation available to help you participate in a
> Fedora Test Day? If not, what did you find missing or in need of
> improvement?
mostly, see examples:
good:
Test Day:2009-03-26 Nouveau
"
/sbin/lspci -d
> Hello,
>
> I don't want to start a long thread, but just to ask a couple questions for
> my own clarification. Does a maintainer's responsibilities end with
> packaging bugs? IOW, if there is a problem in the package that is _broken
> code_ do they need to do something about it or is it acceptabl
> There is much more information that can be pulled via a turbogrears
> app we are running. But I am looking to see what is useful in terms
> of a weekly report. I have the date tuesday to tuesday as it matches
> up with the Bugzappers meeting time.
>
Hi,
thanks for the stats. I'd like to see th
16 matches
Mail list logo
