On 02/10/2008 04:31 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
>> On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote:
>>
>>> Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24
>>> fairly
>>> soon?
>>>
>>
&
Jarod Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote:
Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly
soon?
Chuck was talking about branching in cvs to start doing 2.6.24 builds for at
least F8 as soon as possible for people to
Hello,
I just booted up 2.6.24-9 on an Intel box I have here, and I saw this on
bootup:
DMAR:Host address width 36
DMAR:DRHD (flags: 0x)base: 0xfed9
DMAR:DRHD (flags: 0x)base: 0xfed91000
DMAR:DRHD (flags: 0x)base: 0xfed92000
DMAR:DRHD
Ok, thanks for the info. If it's not likely to be weeks and weeks, then I
don't think I'll update the utrace/2.6.23 backport any more with recent fixes.
utrace/2.6-current is now on 2.6.24, and I won't rebase it for a few days.
When it breaks rawhide or when I get to it, I
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly
> > soon?
>
> Chuck was talking about branching in cvs to start doing 2.6.24 builds for at
On Saturday 26 January 2008 05:19:14 am Roland McGrath wrote:
> Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly
> soon?
Chuck was talking about branching in cvs to start doing 2.6.24 builds for at
least F8 as soon as possible for people to test w/o committing
Is F-[78] going to stay on 2.6.23 for a while, or switch to 2.6.24 fairly soon?
Thanks,
Roland
___
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list
Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
> > To execute.. Quote from [1]:
> > "add video=uvesafb:1024x768-32,mtrr:3,ywrap (or similar) to your
> > kernel command line"
>
> Right, but how does that work if built-in static? Is it relying
> on initialization order vs. initramfs unpacking to find its userspace
> component? Is it just spinning
Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > AFAIK, we don't ship the tools for uvesafb, so it's a little late for
> > it to be a successor. How does it execute them if it's built-in, anyway?
>
> uvesafb just got included in the 2.6.24 which isn't even final yet so
&g
2008/1/8, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> AFAIK, we don't ship the tools for uvesafb, so it's a little late for
> it to be a successor. How does it execute them if it's built-in, anyway?
>
> Bill
uvesafb just got included in the 2.6.24 which isn't ev
Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Why wouldn't it be a module like (most) other framebuffers?
>
> Well.. vesafb is also enabled with 'y' and because uvesafb is it's
> successor it seems logical to me that it also gets enabled with 'y'
> (not as a module but build in). Perhaps a good idea for fed
On 01/08/2008 09:30 AM, Mark wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I just downloaded and installed the latest kernel rpm from koji [1]
> but found out that uvesafb isn't enabled in the fedora kernels. Could
> a kernel maintainer put the following value in the config-generc:
>
> CONFIG_FB_UVESA=y
>
> so that uvesafb
2008/1/8, Bill Nottingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I just downloaded and installed the latest kernel rpm from koji [1]
> > but found out that uvesafb isn't enabled in the fedora kernels. Could
> > a kernel maintainer put the following value in the confi
Mark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Hey,
>
> I just downloaded and installed the latest kernel rpm from koji [1]
> but found out that uvesafb isn't enabled in the fedora kernels. Could
> a kernel maintainer put the following value in the config-generc:
>
> CONFIG_FB_UVESA=y
>
> so that uvesafb is
Hey,
I just downloaded and installed the latest kernel rpm from koji [1]
but found out that uvesafb isn't enabled in the fedora kernels. Could
a kernel maintainer put the following value in the config-generc:
CONFIG_FB_UVESA=y
so that uvesafb is enabled in the next build?
more information about
15 matches
Mail list logo
