On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:43 -0500, Steve wrote:
kernel: end_request: I/O error. dev sr0, sector 0
kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 0
repeat to logical block 7
repeat for other sectors
After some investigation, I have found that I only get these errors if
I boot with a
On Friday 06 March 2009 18:23:08 Tim wrote:
...
I see something like that all the time when there's a CD in the drive.
The auto-mounter attempts to read a file system from the disc, and can't
(e.g. because it's an audio disc), and those are the error responses
about the failure. If it can
Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 11:43 -0500, Steve wrote:
kernel: end_request: I/O error. dev sr0, sector 0
kernel: Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 0
repeat to logical block 7
repeat for other sectors
After some investigation, I have
Tim:
What type of CD is in your drive?
Steve:
$ sudo lshw
...
*-cdrom
description: DVD writer
No, what sort of CD is *in* your drive? Audio, data, cheap disc,
good quality disc...
--
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.15-78.2.23.fc9.i686
Don't send private
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 19:35 -0800, john wendel wrote:
Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
STF
===
http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/ . My PGP key fingerprint is:
9D25 3D89
Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
It’s a bit out of date, but Dave Jones produced
http://people.redhat.com/davej/patchlist-fc3.txt
describing all the patches that went into an FC3 kernel. The kernel has
changed a lot, but Fedora still patches for similar
Stanisław T. Findeisen wrote:
Why doesn't Fedora use vanilla Linux kernel?
Because packages need to be patched to integrate with the rest of the
distribution and the kernel is no exception.
Because Fedora is about shipping new technologies which sometimes have to be
backported to stable
paul s wrote:
how do you build the kernel-firmware rpm?
You need to build the noarch parts. Do a:
rpmbuild --target=noarch --rebuild kernel-src.rpm
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:44:03 Jim wrote:
FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start,
esc, tab, What ??
Here's what I do:
1) edit /boot/grub/grub.conf
change timeout=0 to timeout=20
Comment out the hiddenmenu line
2) save the above changes
reboot - now you
Kevin Kempter wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:44:03 Jim wrote:
FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start,
esc, tab, What ??
Here's what I do:
1) edit /boot/grub/grub.conf
change timeout=0 to timeout=20
Comment out the hiddenmenu line
2) save the above
2009/1/27 Jim mickey...@sbcglobal.net:
Kevin Kempter wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 09:44:03 Jim wrote:
FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start,
esc, tab, What ??
Here's what I do:
1) edit /boot/grub/grub.conf
change timeout=0 to timeout=20
Comment out
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:44:03AM -0500, Jim wrote:
FC10, How do I select the kernel I want to boot from, at boot start, esc,
tab, What ??
I usually just hold down a Ctrl key during boot to see the menu.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
I revived this laptop by giving it a hard drive transplant, then loading F10
on it. Everything works, except for the battery meter. The kernel does not
see the laptop's battery, and complains thusly:
ACPI: AC
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 21:06:29 -0500,
Dave Feustel dfeus...@mindspring.com wrote:
Will f9 be upgraded to the 2.6.28 kernel?
There are already f9 (and f10) versions of 2.6.28 in koji.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
As in cleaned it all out, leaving only 1 of 20 some old entries I had in it.
I know a kernel update used to play with the default fallback entries and
would delete 2 versions back, but it left the rest of the file alone so the
formatting
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Steve wrote:
Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@verizon.net wrote:
As in cleaned it all out, leaving only 1 of 20 some old entries I had in
it.
I know a kernel update used to play with the default fallback entries
and would delete 2 versions back, but it left the
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:56:17 -0500, Gene wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:53:41 -0500, Gene wrote:
Also, a recent ntp update
What recent ntp update do you refer to? Give version and release,
please. Use details from rpm -qa --last|grep ntp
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 10:56:17 -0500, Gene wrote:
On Thursday 08 January 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2009 09:53:41 -0500, Gene wrote:
Also, a recent ntp update
What recent ntp update do you refer to? Give version and
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 12:55 +0100, William John Murray wrote:
Hm. my laptop gives:
could not start boot splash: No such file or directory.
I do have LVM running, but I don't think I did anything special there:
This is /etc/fstab
tmpfs /dev/shmtmpfs defaults0 0
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:48:25 +0530
Bisban [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to get the source code for my kernel 2.6.25
Install the kernel src rpm that matches the kernel you have.
And why F9? F10 is out!
--
Brian Morrison
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud;
stan wrote:
Hi,
This is a longshot but I've been downloading the source for the fedora
kernels and compiling them to suit my system better for 6 months or so
(since 2.6.24). It has been working great. I've been using the same
config since I got one working (there seem to be all kinds of
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 14:45 -0500, Steve West wrote:
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
Steve West wrote:
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run for a few seconds:
$ vmstat 1
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run for a few seconds:
$ vmstat 1
look at system|in = interrupts
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:49 -0500, Steve West wrote:
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run
On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 12:49 -0500, Steve West wrote:
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run
Steve West wrote:
I am running Fedora 9 x86 64 bit. What is the kernel timetick per
thread? How many threads per second does the kernel run?
Probably not quite what you are asking but here goes:
http://kerneltrap.org/node/464
run for a few seconds:
$ vmstat 1
look at system|in =
On 17Nov2008 15:19, Steve West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ticks matter when the threads are competing for cpu, but it looks
like in your case they'll mostly be waiting for socket calls (during
which the schedular will hand off to another thread anyway), so
increasing the timeslice frequency
On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:23:09 pm Waleed Harbi wrote:
-The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) hardware is the future replacement
-for the 8254 and Real Time Clock (RTC) periodic timer functionality.
-Each HPET can have up to 32 timers. It is possible to configure the
-first two timers
On Sunday 16 November 2008 07:40:04 am Peter Reed wrote:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:23:09 pm Waleed Harbi wrote:
-The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) hardware is the future replacement
-for the 8254 and Real Time Clock (RTC) periodic timer functionality.
-Each HPET can have up to 32
On Saturday 15 November 2008 11:54:32 am Martín Marqués wrote:
I just updated my F9 in my laptop (Compaq Presario F756la) and I
noticed problems booting the kernel.
At first I just thought it hanged at boot time (it freezed during the
boot sequence). Then I took of the quite option from grub
2008/11/15 Peter Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 11:54:32 am Martín Marqués wrote:
I just updated my F9 in my laptop (Compaq Presario F756la) and I
noticed problems booting the kernel.
At first I just thought it hanged at boot time (it freezed during the
boot sequence).
On Saturday 15 November 2008 05:09:10 pm Martín Marqués wrote:
2008/11/15 Peter Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Saturday 15 November 2008 11:54:32 am Martín Marqués wrote:
I just updated my F9 in my laptop (Compaq Presario F756la) and I
noticed problems booting the kernel.
At first I just
Peter Reed wrote:
I found this in the linux kernel bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11418
Put hpet=disable in the kernel command line and see if that works. It
did for me.
BTW, I have no idea on what hpet is.
Yes thanks that seems to have fixed the problem. Booted fine.
-The High Precision Event Timer (HPET) hardware is the future replacement
-for the 8254 and Real Time Clock (RTC) periodic timer functionality.
-Each HPET can have up to 32 timers. It is possible to configure the
-first two timers as legacy replacements for 8254 and RTC periodic timers.
-A
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:46 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
I put this question up yesterday, but didnt get any responses.
Im trying again, as this stopping me from running on f9.
F9 already has a 2.6.27 kernel. Are you sure you need to recompile?
poc
--
fedora-list mailing list
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:46 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
I put this question up yesterday, but didnt get any responses.
Im trying again, as this stopping me from running on f9.
F9 already has a 2.6.27 kernel. Are you sure you need to recompile?
Yes, I need to add the PPS stuff, which isnt
Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:23:34 -0700
Aldo Foot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oct 28 08:53:28 myhost kernel: martian source 255.255.255.255 from
what do they mean?
A martian source is an invalid IP address. In your case, 255.255.255.255 is
the IP address. It's
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Seann Clark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. I see this a lot on my firewall, but that is because
both my ISP and myself use a 10.x.x.x private IP range that overlaps. They
use it for the management of the cable modems, and I use it for more
traditional uses
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:23:34 -0700
Aldo Foot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oct 28 08:53:28 myhost kernel: martian source 255.255.255.255 from
what do they mean?
A martian source is an invalid IP address. In your case, 255.255.255.255 is
the IP address. It's impossible for that to be a valid
john wendel wrote:
Martín Marqués wrote:
Will there be soon a 2.6.27 kernel for Fedora 9, or do we have to wait
for Fedora 10 to come out?
If not, what's needed to get the src.rpm from 2.6.27 from F10 compiled
and installed. I tried compiling it, which went OK, but when I tried
to installed
I have gotten all the files I needed to compile the software. I can now
use the Marvell ethernet, however when I try to connect with the Atheros
wifi it tries to connect but then comes back with the error message
network disconnected. Any one have an idea.
I tried upgrading via yum to get the
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 19:58 -0300, Martín Marqués wrote:
Will there be soon a 2.6.27 kernel for Fedora 9, or do we have to wait
for Fedora 10 to come out?
If not, what's needed to get the src.rpm from 2.6.27 from F10 compiled
and installed. I tried compiling it, which went OK, but when I
Bill Davidsen davidsen at tmr.com writes:
I seldom upgrade anything unless it's broken, or has a new feature I *really*
want.
Bad idea. We do not and cannot test selective upgrades, there are just too many
combinations. In the old RHL days, all update advisories contained the
following
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 17:19 -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
Mail Lists wrote:
On 10/10/2008 03:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mail Lists wrote:
In this new mode we would have only 2 streams - current development
and stable.
There are a few distributions that do this - Gentoo, Arch etc.
Mail Lists wrote:
Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to stable.
Would the kernel release style be
Mail Lists wrote:
Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to stable.
Would the kernel release style be
On 10/10/2008 02:30 PM, Chris Snook wrote:
Mail Lists wrote:
Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to
Mail Lists wrote:
In this new mode we would have only 2 streams - current development
and stable.
Current development targets remerging every few weeks into stable ..
quite different than current rawhide and patching f8/f9 and the next big
bang release is f10 etc.
Google back in lkml
Mail Lists wrote:
While that is true, the argument goes that large periodic releases
has drawbacks too - and the kernel seems to be do pretty well with its
approach ... I still wonder whether the kernel way may work for fedora ..
Linux kernel development model is pretty unique and very
Mail Lists lists at sapience.com writes:
Linus switched kernel development away from large releases (odd/even
major numbers) with infrequent release cycles and instead switched to
something more continuous - essentially small rapid changes and
frequent snapshots to stable.
This is
Mail Lists wrote:
On 10/10/2008 03:49 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Mail Lists wrote:
In this new mode we would have only 2 streams - current development
and stable.
There are a few distributions that do this - Gentoo, Arch etc. Each has
it's advantages and disadvantages. One of the
.)
Kevin Kofler
Thanks for all the thoughts ..
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
with 2.6.27-0.382.rc8.git4.fc10.i686 kernel and latest
xorg-x11-drv-i810-2.4.2-9.fc10, gdm-2.24.0-8.fc10, everything is
running fine.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
2008/10/5 Dan Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antonio M wrote:
with 2.6.27-0.382.rc8.git4.fc10.i686 kernel and latest
xorg-x11-drv-i810-2.4.2-9.fc10, gdm-2.24.0-8.fc10, everything is
running fine.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
Antonio M wrote:
2008/10/5 Dan Thurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antonio M wrote:
with 2.6.27-0.382.rc8.git4.fc10.i686 kernel and latest
xorg-x11-drv-i810-2.4.2-9.fc10, gdm-2.24.0-8.fc10, everything is
running fine.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, Mike wrote:
Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical boot?
I am also without graphical login on two different machines... there is a
bugzilla entry I believe already opened (no solution yet)
Alfredo
--
Around 09:03am on Thursday, October 02, 2008 (UK time), Mike scrawled:
Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical boot?
I don't know if it is just you, but it does work properly form me.
Steve
--
(o www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora
V_/_No MS
2008/10/2 Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical boot?
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
Antonio M antonio.montagnani at gmail.com writes:
which graphic card and graphic driver???
One is a Dell M4300 laptop-
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_8a5cfd23-a9fb-4eda-9a8a-23171d46c3b4
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
2008/10/2 Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Antonio M antonio.montagnani at gmail.com writes:
which graphic card and graphic driver???
One is a Dell M4300 laptop-
http://www.smolts.org/client/show/pub_8a5cfd23-a9fb-4eda-9a8a-23171d46c3b4
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
Steve Searle wrote:
Around 09:03am on Thursday, October 02, 2008 (UK time), Mike scrawled:
Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical
boot?
I don't know if it is just you, but it does work properly form me.
Steve
This kernel also killed RHGB for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike wrote:
| Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical
boot?
Are you using a proprietary video driver? If so, perhaps you need to
compile new modules to match the new kernel.
- --
- -John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mike wrote:
Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical boot?
It's not just you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/462980
Anyone else who has this problem please report this in the bug to help
diagnose this.
Simon.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To
Simon Andrews simon.andrews at bbsrc.ac.uk writes:
It's not just you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/462980
Anyone else who has this problem please report this in the bug to help
diagnose this.
Thank you for that - I should have checked bz first when I get back to my
machines later I
Mike wrote:
Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical
boot?
It is not just you, but me as well. I have Intel graphics
chip-sets as I posted this and BZ as well:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465132
My motherboards are:
1)
Mike wrote:
Is it just me or does kernel 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686 not give a graphical boot?
Something related here, I think - with 2.6.26.3-14 the kernel wouldn't
even boot with vga=804 parameter - just stayed on blank screen right
after BIOS. Somehow, pressing the power button would bring it
2008/9/21 Antonio Olivares [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--- On Sun, 9/21/08, David McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: KERNEL HEADERS
To: For users of Fedora Core releases fedora-list@redhat.com
Date: Sunday, September 21, 2008, 7:40 AM
I have been
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:15 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to
Alan Cox wrote:
- GSI
17 (level, low) - IRQ 17
Sep 24 09:02:22 localhost kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
pointer
dereference at 0208
What is needed to debug this is all
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:18 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
I just noticed that you are using the ath5k driver on your system.
That
is what I am tring to get working on my Tosiba laptop. How did you
insall it.
I didn't. It came with the system.
I am using FC09 is that what you are using?
William Biggs wrote:
where and how do I download kernel-PAE for fedora 9 32 bit and how do I
install it ?
yum install kernel-PAE
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Agile Aspect [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi - I have a Toshiba Satellite L355D-S7815 laptop with r8108E (10/100
Mbits/sec)
NIC which I'm trying to get working.
There's appears to be a bug in the default kernel (2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64)
for Fedora 9:
Sep 24
- GSI
17 (level, low) - IRQ 17
Sep 24 09:02:22 localhost kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL
pointer
dereference at 0208
What is needed to debug this is all the stuff after the BUG: line
Kam Leo wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Agile Aspect [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi - I have a Toshiba Satellite L355D-S7815 laptop with r8108E (10/100
Mbits/sec)
NIC which I'm trying to get working.
There's appears to be a bug in the default kernel (2.6.25-14.fc9.x86_64)
for
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to them and can't figure out what file
they are in in order to link to them.
Dave
Antonio Olivares wrote:
--- On Sun, 9/21/08, David McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to them and can't figure out what file
they are in in order to link to them.
Are the headers for the exact same kernel you are
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to them and can't figure out what file
they are in in order to link to them.
Are the headers
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 13:15 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 12:16 -0400, David McCormick wrote:
Ok I checked and as I thought the headers are installed. My problem is
that I have to install a link to them and can't figure out what
Phill wrote:
Downloaded live fedora 10 alpha kde, but can't get it to boot in VirtualBox.
Any help appreciated.
I would guess a virtualbox bug. The debug code enabled in the pre-release
kernels takes advantage of some of the more obscure cpu features that probably
get the least QA
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
The build for kernel-headers from the latest Fedora 8 is missing
linux/ext3_fs.h it would seem that the config in the i386 build does not pull
it in. Does anybody know how I can alter the source RPM to get this and other
missing headers loaded?
Karl-Olov Serrander wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
The build for kernel-headers from the latest Fedora 8 is missing
linux/ext3_fs.h it would seem that the config in the i386 build does
not pull it in. Does anybody know how I can alter the source RPM to
get this and other
On Fri, 2008-09-05 at 13:07 +0100, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
Karl-Olov Serrander wrote:
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Howard Wilkinson wrote:
The build for kernel-headers from the latest Fedora 8 is missing
linux/ext3_fs.h it would seem that the config in the i386 build does
not pull it in. Does
Well this works on my P4 520 Fedora 8 box.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?s=198aa5e0e604d8b3d8adc2e94d856cb6t=197442page=2pp=15
[1]
Links:
--
[1]
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?s=198aa5e0e604d8b3d8adc2e94d856cb6amp;t=197442amp;page=2amp;pp=15
--
I am having the same problem. That's one update I'll remember. My stuff:
yumdownloader --enable=livna --source nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn8
yumdownloader --enable=livna --source xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173.14.12-1.lvn8
yum --nogpgcheck localinstall
Robert C Smith wrote:
I have been using Windows for over 15 years but I'm new to Linux. I
recently installed Fedora 9 from a Live CD and allowed it to update
itself over the net. I am trying to find out my kernel version. On the
GNOME desktop from the top menu bar I select System -- About
2008/8/21 Robert C Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have been using Windows for over 15 years but I'm new to Linux. I
recently installed Fedora 9 from a Live CD and allowed it to update
itself over the net. I am trying to find out my kernel version. On the
GNOME desktop from the top menu bar I
Hi!
- Original Message
From: Robert C Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 12:25:57 AM
Subject: Kernel Version
I have been using Windows for over 15 years but I'm new to Linux. I
recently installed Fedora 9 from a Live CD and allowed
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 07:40 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 15.08.2008 07:10, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Dave Burns wrote:
...
using rpmbuild command? What switches?
This is not rocket science :-)
For my x86_64 machine:
# rpm -i nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.src.rpm
# rpm -i
John Austin ja at jaa.org.uk writes:
rpmdev-setuptree
This downloads source rpms into home directory
yumdownloader --enable=livna --source nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.
yumdownloader --enable=livna --source xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-173.14.12-1.lvn9
This rebuilds the binary rpms in the rpmbuild
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 14:52 +, Mike wrote:
John Austin ja at jaa.org.uk writes:
rpmdev-setuptree
This downloads source rpms into home directory
yumdownloader --enable=livna --source nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.
yumdownloader --enable=livna --source
John Austin ja at jaa.org.uk writes:
So I would just try installing the matching kernel-devel for your system
yum install kernel-devel
should pull the one for the current kernel
Well, I have not tried on my F9 systems but in F8 I did already have
kernel-devel
installed for the new kernel -
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 17:27 +, Mike wrote:
John Austin ja at jaa.org.uk writes:
So I would just try installing the matching kernel-devel for your system
yum install kernel-devel
should pull the one for the current kernel
Well, I have not tried on my F9 systems but in F8 I did
John Austin ja at jaa.org.uk writes:
Its been a painful story
Installed F9 on a machine with old Matrox G550 graphics card
X will only give 800x600 Resolution
Bought a cheap nvidia card - runs slowly with nv driver !!!
livna not rebuilding nvidia at the moment
Livna kmods have
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 22:49 +, Mike wrote:
Livna kmods have been rebuilt - a yum update a short time ago
gave me the files so I am now running my f8 machines fully
up to date.
Likewise for Fedora 9, if people are still waiting for it on there, too.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
...
There was a note yesterday or so that the Livna nvidia packages for the
latest kernel are delayed. Keep trying
I fetched livna SRPMS:
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-9.lvn9.src.rpm
nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.src.rpm
Install the first, edit:
No hints where to find the boot-time error messages if not in dmesg?
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Mogens Kjaer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I fetched livna SRPMS:
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-9.lvn9.src.rpm
nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.src.rpm
Install the first, edit:
Dave Burns wrote:
...
using rpmbuild command? What switches?
This is not rocket science :-)
For my x86_64 machine:
# rpm -i nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.src.rpm
# rpm -i buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-9.lvn9.src.rpm
# cd /usr/src/redhat/SOURCES
# vi buildsys-build-rpmfusion-kerneldevpkgs-*
On 15.08.2008 07:10, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
Dave Burns wrote:
...
using rpmbuild command? What switches?
This is not rocket science :-)
For my x86_64 machine:
# rpm -i nvidia-kmod-173.14.12-2.lvn9.src.rpm
# rpm -i buildsys-build-rpmfusion-9.1-9.lvn9.src.rpm
Just FYI, you don't need to
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:51 -1000, Dave Burns wrote:
Well, there is an nvidia.ko there now:
# rpm -q --filesbypkg kmod-nvidia-2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686.i686
kmod-nvidia-2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686
/lib/modules/2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686/extra/nvidia
kmod-nvidia-2.6.25.11-97.fc9.i686
201 - 300 of 400 matches
Mail list logo
