Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-26 23:01:24 EDT ---
ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-26 22:56:23 EDT ---
ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-15 22:13:38 EDT ---
ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-03 16:21:26 EDT ---
ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2009-06-03 16:21:32 EDT ---
ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an updat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
Adam Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #15 from Adam Miller 2009-06-02 15:52:37
EDT ---
Taken care of the rpmlint warnings as well as added the LFLAG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-02 15:15:56
EDT ---
Fix the rpmlint warnings as well.
Also, you should make a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #13 from Adam Miller 2009-06-02 14:54:36
EDT ---
Fixed the areas where NEEDSWORK was tagged.
Spec URL: http:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-02 13:18:43
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
ophcrack.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary O
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #11 from Adam Miller 2009-06-02 10:40:08
EDT ---
I apparently jumped the gun on my previous post. The project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29
14:34:41 EDT ---
Nope, there is still the issue of the optflags:
In the beg
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #9 from Adam Miller 2009-05-29 11:16:41
EDT ---
The new release looks good to me, upstream fixed the issues I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 16:12:43
EDT ---
Okay, please ask them to make also sure that the CFLAGS set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #7 from Adam Miller 2009-05-28 16:09:07
EDT ---
I have been in contact with upstream ever since I decided to p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 12:39:57
EDT ---
Ugh, what a broken build system.
- You need
BuildRequires:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #5 from Adam Miller 2009-05-28 10:41:56
EDT ---
Got rid of the macro in the URL
Removed the Requires
Spec UR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 09:58:11
EDT ---
- Don't use macros in the URL. This makes copy-paste impossi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #3 from Adam Miller 2009-05-28 09:41:56
EDT ---
I fixed the URL/Source0 mishap, that one was a horrible oversi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 04:06:33
EDT ---
A few initial notes:
- You're mixing URL with Source0. Sour
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 04:07:18
EDT ---
Once you have fixed these I'll do the full review.
--
Conf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
27 matches
Mail list logo
