On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:39:00PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:00:39AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > > On 03.12.2014, at 01:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 0
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 01:19:48PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:00:39AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > On 03.12.2014, at 01:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 02:09:01PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:00:39AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 03.12.2014, at 01:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 02:09:01PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:1
On 03.12.2014, at 01:40, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 02:09:01PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:19:32AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
On 17.11.2014, at 02:37, Michae
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 02:09:01PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:19:32AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > > On 17.11.2014, at 02:37, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 0
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:19:32AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > On 17.11.2014, at 02:37, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:16:03PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> > >> 11674 -> 10877 decicycles
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:19:32AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On 17.11.2014, at 02:37, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:16:03PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> >> 11674 -> 10877 decicycles on my Phenom II.
> >> Overall speedup was unfortunately within measurement er
On 17.11.2014, at 02:37, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:16:03PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
>> 11674 -> 10877 decicycles on my Phenom II.
>> Overall speedup was unfortunately within measurement error.
>
> here its 10153 ->10135
I suspect it also depends a bit on the
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:16:03PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> 11674 -> 10877 decicycles on my Phenom II.
> Overall speedup was unfortunately within measurement error.
here its 10153 ->10135
but ive a slightly odd feeling about the chnages to the asm code,
iam not sure if all assemblers wil
11674 -> 10877 decicycles on my Phenom II.
Overall speedup was unfortunately within measurement error.
Signed-off-by: Reimar Döffinger
---
libavcodec/x86/h264_i386.h | 30 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavcodec/x86/h264_i386.h b/
10 matches
Mail list logo