In a message dated 9/19/2001 6:55:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Any suggestions? ISTM the only option is to do a preview which includes the
> film mask, then switch to manual exposure, and keep that setting for the
> rest of the film (or at least the strip).
Yes, this is exactly what
Rob writes ...
> ...
> The most frustrating thing is that the preview image
> looks fine, but I can't find a setting which makes
> the final image look anything like the preview.
> ...
It could be the white balance setting for white% ... try a higher setting
which will allow more white p
Similar to what you've tried, check the "Advanced Workflow Suggestions" in
the Help file to determine the fixed exposure setting for the film - maybe
that will help.
I assume you've already tried the "None" setting for Color balance.
Have you tried changing the Gamma and Image brightness setting
ilmscanners: Autoexposure problem in
Vuescan
This is true, Ed. The preview does sometimes look very different (but the
end results are worth it).
Maris
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:50 AM
Subjec
Maris wrote:
> Similar to what you've tried, check the "Advanced Workflow
> Suggestions" in the Help file to determine the fixed
> exposure setting for the film - maybe that will help.
Looks like that's effectively what I've done by including
part of the mask.
> I assume you've already tried the
Ed wrote:
> Yes, this is exactly what the "Advanced Workflow Suggestions"
> section of the help file recommends.
Cool. Maybe my recent photos are unusual because most people don't spend
their time photographing lots of planes in bright sky, but I wanted to raise
it in the group so others were aw
In a message dated 9/19/2001 6:17:07 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Cool. Maybe my recent photos are unusual because most people don't spend
> their time photographing lots of planes in bright sky, but I wanted to
raise
> it in the group so others were aware of the issue.
I'll try to ad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll try to add some code to automatically detect this case, and
> set the mask value to something reasonable.
Great! :)
> > OK, presumably the preview is ok because it does include the
> > mask somewhere.
> Yes, the preview probably has some of the unexposed film
This is true, Ed. The preview does sometimes look very different (but the
end results are worth it).
Maris
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Autoexpo
