On Jul 1, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Don Hart wrote:
Is it just me, or does anyone
else sense a connotation with Tempo I that it starts a substantial
section
of music, and is not as appropriate when used more commonly, like from
phrase to phrase?
It's just you. 8-)
Seriously, though, there is no
Nothing. I wasn't sure where meno m. and piu m. stood when drawing a line
between using English or Italian, and was inquiring to find a good
alternative, if there is one.
In early returns Tempo I is the clear leader. Is it just me, or does anyone
else sense a connotation with Tempo I that it sta
At 1:11 AM -0500 7/1/06, Don Hart wrote:
I'd like to get your vote on the following: what is the best way to indicate
a specific variance in tempo *within* a section of music already marked
rubato? Just read the example below and pick the best answer.
Say, for example, that a piece starts with
I'd go for "Tempo I".
And I wouldn't recommend using English alternatives to standard terms
like "meno mosso". If you write "meno mosso", it should be understood
by anyone anywhere in the world who has learnt to read music, whereas
if you translate it into English the non-English speakers
On Jul 1, 2006, at 2:11 AM, Don Hart wrote:
I'd like to get your vote on the following: what is the best way to
indicate
a specific variance in tempo *within* a section of music already
marked
rubato? Just read the example below and pick the best answer.
Say, for example, that a piece sta
I'd like to get your vote on the following: what is the best way to indicate
a specific variance in tempo *within* a section of music already marked
rubato? Just read the example below and pick the best answer.
Say, for example, that a piece starts with the tempo marking "rubato,
quarter = c. 100