Hi,
Definitely, if you have all the columns in the branch table defined in HO
table.
Regards.
Sudheer P
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, raja_s_patil wrote:
> **
>
>
>
> Thanks Sudheer Palaparambil for such elaborate explanation.
>
> I am surely going to evaluate this since it seems to
Thanks Sudheer Palaparambil for such elaborate explanation.
I am surely going to evaluate this since it seems to be promising. This week we
are collecting requirements From client and decide which, where and How tables
are to be replicated. Today we discussed gross level requirements which
Hi,
SymmetricDS is an asynchronous data replication software package that
supports multiple subscribers
and bi-directional synchronization. It uses web and database technologies to
replicate tables between
relational databases, in near real time if desired. The software was
designed to scale for a
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
>
> >>Pls have a look at the open source project
> >> http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using
> >> this
> >> for the last 2 years
> >> with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You
>>Pls have a look at the open source project
>> http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this
>> for the last 2 years
>> with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO
>> to branch as well as branch to HO.
>>
>
> Yet another optio
Thanks Sudheer,
>
> Pls have a look at the open source project
> http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this
> for the last 2 years
> with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO
> to branch as well as branch to HO.
>
Yet a
Hi Friends,
Pls have a look at the open source project
http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this
for the last 2 years
with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO
to branch as well as branch to HO.
Regards.
Sudheer Pa
Sam wrote:
<<
...
Take a look at the Synchronization Example at the bottom of this
link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sync/bb821992 It explains the
basic concept of how Sync Framework syncs the data. The whole key to
it is the "Update Tick Count" which is database wide. In the
Microsoft worl
Thanks Thomas Steinmaure,
>
> For database standby and/or one-way replication requirements you could
> also try IB LogManager and it's addons. A video on how this works
> together is available here:
> http://www.iblogmanager.com/download/demos/iblm/iblm_hotstandby.htm
>
I will keep in mind th
Thanks Helen Borrie,
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie wrote:
>
> And to R. S. Patil, we have hijacked your thread and for this, I apologise.
>
No need of apologies, In fact I feel privileged when Person like you answer my
queries. You people have done lot of work to help
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "samcarleton" wrote:
>>
>> raja_s_patil,
>>
>> Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you
>> asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world
>> is a HUGE question and possible show stopper:
>>
>>
At 02:45 PM 9/10/2011, raja_s_patil wrote:
>We have decided to tryout IBPhoenix IBreplicator for this. For me also this is
>First Kind of Task. We thought that deciding would be Database size is First
>Step then checking which RDBMS will support is Next. Now since FB 2.5 seems to
>be OK so we w
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "samcarleton" wrote:
>
> raja_s_patil,
>
> Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you
> asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world
> is a HUGE question and possible show stopper:
>
> -:> No
raja_s_patil,
Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you asked,
but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world is a HUGE
question and possible show stopper:
-:> Now Client wants to have centralized database with two way Replication at
HO.
Hav
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote:
>
> Hello, raja_s_patil!
>
> Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:37:06 AM, you wrote:
>
> r> client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized
> r> database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 1
15 matches
Mail list logo