Re: CF/Flex wizards (was Re: [flexcoders] Re: any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?)

2006-07-06 Thread Douglas Knudsen
Speaking of these wizards, how can we modify the templates they are generated from? How difficult would it be to make them scriptable or add the ability for them to act on mulitple tables? DK On 7/5/06, Douglas Knudsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/06, Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[flexcoders] Re: any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?

2006-07-05 Thread Tom Jordahl
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since we have more CF developers in-house, we're wondering if there are any disadvantages or limitations of using CF with FDS instead of using Java. Just wanted to jump in here and say that using ColdFusion does have some

Re: [flexcoders] Re: any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?

2006-07-05 Thread Tom Bray
Thanks, Tom. The primary responsibility of our server-side logic is to push data out to clients (updating user lists, sending validated chat messages, etc.), so it sounds like that's a deal-breaker for CF. :(-Tom On 7/5/06, Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

CF/Flex wizards (was Re: [flexcoders] Re: any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?)

2006-07-05 Thread Douglas Knudsen
On 7/5/06, Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since we have more CF developers in-house, we're wondering if there are any disadvantages or limitations of using CF with FDS instead of using Java. Just wanted to jump in

[flexcoders] Re: any disadvantages to using FDS + CF vs. FDS + Java?

2006-07-05 Thread Tom Jordahl
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, Tom Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, Tom. The primary responsibility of our server-side logic is to push data out to clients (updating user lists, sending validated chat messages, etc.), so it sounds like that's a deal-breaker for CF. :( Well, so let