Typically, one creates the correctly named page and abandons the
original...
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org
[mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of Stephan
Beal
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 2:16 AM
To: Fossil SCM user's discussion
Subject: Re: [foss
ossil
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Williams, Brian
wrote:
Has anyone thrown themselves on this grenade yet?
If not, I can take a look at autoconf.
I got a chat message from someone who said they would take a look.
Surely the autoconf for Fossil won't be to hard? All it need
Has anyone thrown themselves on this grenade yet?
If not, I can take a look at autoconf.
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org
[mailto:fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm.org] On Behalf Of
Remigiusz Modrzejewski
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 7:12 AM
To: foss
Richard's question regarding a multi level undo, and when to purge, got
me thinking; and I apologize for posting mid - thought stream ...
What if fossil kept track of all the commands issued that change either
the repository or the working files.
Obviously, it already does this at some level
Stephen, you hit on the point that was a revelation to me (back in the
day).
The Fossil web site isn't a web site; it's the WIKI.
The discussions of page design aside, perhaps that fact should be
mentioned in the first bullet.
-Original Message-
From: fossil-users-boun...@lists.fossil-scm
I have a question for you:
When you say you "copy" the repo, are you file coping or doing a fossil
clone?
Again, when you say you "overwrite" the repo on Computer 1, are
overwriting the file or doing a sync?
If you are really overwriting the repositories then I can well expect
that there are probl
6 matches
Mail list logo
