2011/7/28 Bernd prof7...@googlemail.com:
¹ I depend on OpenSSL already anyways, so I thought why not make use
of its bignum too when I need it.
I hope you're aware of the FPC GMP bindings:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/gmp
The section
http://wiki.freepascal.org/gmp#Extensions_bindings_.26_types
2011/7/31 Honza befelemepesev...@gmail.com:
2011/7/28 Bernd prof7...@googlemail.com:
¹ I depend on OpenSSL already anyways, so I thought why not make use
of its bignum too when I need it.
I hope you're aware of the FPC GMP bindings:
http://wiki.freepascal.org/gmp
It seems the author fought
Am 28.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
I wonder if I could ask a silly question here, without displaying too
much ignorance.
I generally understand the significance of an interface in the Windows
context, where COM (or whatever today's name for it) is integrated
fairly deeply into the
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 28.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
I wonder if I could ask a silly question here, without displaying too
much ignorance.
I generally understand the significance of an interface in the Windows
context, where COM (or whatever today's name for it) is integrated
Am 29.07.2011 12:11, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
Sven Barth wrote:
Am 28.07.2011 23:04, schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
I wonder if I could ask a silly question here, without displaying too
much ignorance.
I generally understand the significance of an interface in the Windows
context, where COM (or
Bernd wrote:
Hi,
I am just trying to wrap (parts of) the OpenSSL¹ bignum library (large
integer arithmetic) into something that makes using it look at least a
little bit more elegant than using the naked procedural C API while
at the same time trying to not overdo it and not create a heavy