On 1/25/06, Doug wrote:
>
> Also, sometimes when I use Notepad to edit my Maker.ini file, it
> becomes corrupted. The EOL markers seem to vanish, the whole thing
> becomes a jumble, and Frame doesn't work properly until I restore an
> uncorrupted version of the file. What's up with this/
>
Note
Jeremy,
On 25/01/06, Jeremy H. Griffith wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:14:44 +0100, Jakob Fix
> wrote:
>
> >I guess one could save the old files in MIF, and load them in 7.x,
> >but how can this be automated? DZBatcher? Any other ideas?
>
> Sure. Download the free demo version of Mif2Go:
>
Hi all,
would it be possible to write a (or use an existing) tool for saving FM files
(any version) as MIF without the need of the FrameMaker application to be
running?
I know we can use DZbatcher or similar tools, but these require FrameMaker to
be available.
Met vriendelijke groet / kind r
> Ideally, we'd like to upgrade to the latest version of all software,
> including FrameMaker v7.2 and WebWorks ePublisher Pro. However,
> Sourcerer (which we absolutely rely on) does not yet support FrameMaker
> v7.2. So for now we'll stick with Frame v7.1.
I've had several users verify that Sou
Rick, Shlomo,
thanks for your replies.
On 25/01/06, Shlomo Perets wrote:
> Jakob,
>
> You wrote:
>
> >we have the following problem on a couple of machines, with different
> >documents:
> >
> >If, on opening a file with missing figures, the user chooses to skip
> >this (and possibly all other fi
John,
Did any of the 35 who said they use the Character Catalog, especially
the adamant ones, say why this method is preferred? (Sorry, I wasn't
following the thread).
Thanks.
Pearl Rosenberg
TeleHealth Services
- Original Message -
From: John Wilcox
Date: Wednesday, January 25, 200
Hi Pearl,
Hello,
for some of my recent Frame problems, I received very useful
information through this mailing list. I would like to add references
to these posts to our internal documentation, preferably just a URL
per post. However, I'm not sure this is possible with the Lyris
mailing list software (and
Jakob, not to be a party-pooper, but I'm not real hot on the idea of
my posts possibly making their way into someone's documentation.
> for some of my recent Frame problems, I received very useful
> information through this mailing list. I would like to add
> references to these posts to our inte
John,
On 26/01/06, John Posada wrote:
> Jakob, not to be a party-pooper, but I'm not real hot on the idea of
> my posts possibly making their way into someone's documentation.
ah, a misunderstanding: I intend to use these links just as references
for internal howto documents to be shared with co
> ah, a misunderstanding: I intend to use these links
> just as references for internal howto documents to be
> shared with colleagues, not as an official documentation
> that will be distributed to clients, if that's
> your concern.
Sorry, Jakob, there was no misunderstanding.
Why? you may ha
John wrote:
-> Why? you may have every intention of not making them public,
-> but once they are in documentation, anything can happen;
-> somepone else recycles what you create not knowing the
-> restrictions, you leave and someone takes over the stuff and
-> doesn't know, it's just an issue I
> Would copying and pasting into internal documetation
> be any better?
> I don't think so.
Chances are that if the information is copied and pasted, not
everything ffrom the message is included...headers, sigs, and other
attributes would be stripped out. A URL includes everything.
I'm not going
John,
On 26/01/06, John Posada wrote:
> > ah, a misunderstanding: I intend to use these links
> > just as references for internal howto documents to be
> > shared with colleagues, not as an official documentation
> > that will be distributed to clients, if that's
> > your concern.
>
> Sorry, Jako
> If I'd simply asked for "easy access to previous
> posts via a simple one-URL-per-post scheme instead
> of a long and not always successful
> search in the mailing list archive", you would have
> agreed, or wouldn't you?
If it means a direct URL to a post by non-members out of the control
of
Jakob,
I believe, if you read the copyright notice on frameusers.com, you
will see that ownership of posts is retained by the author. And I
would submit that because the content of the site is copyrighted as a
body, that body-of-work further documents each posting as belonging to
the author.
I ea
If I were you, I'd ping Jeremy at Omsys, publishers of MIF2Go. If
anyone knows or
could do it, they'd be the guys...
Art
On 1/26/06, Wim Hooghwinkel (Scriptware) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> would it be possible to write a (or use an existing) tool for saving FM files
> (any version) as MIF without the
Sorry, just found out that Framers is archived publicly with exactly
what I need:
http://www.mail-archive.com/framers at lists.frameusers.com/
All is well now (except maybe for John P. :-))
--
cheers,
Jakob.
Art,
I know I should refrain from replying ... but ... can't ... must ... answer. :-)
On 26/01/06, Art Campbell wrote:
> Jakob,
>
> I believe, if you read the copyright notice on frameusers.com, you
> will see that ownership of posts is retained by the author. And I
> would submit that because t
I'm so glad that the technical ability to do it has superceded the
wishes of people who are taking their time to help other list
members.
I'm sure I can find instructions and links on the web to crack
someone's IT enterprise. That must make it OK too.
--- Jakob Fix wrote:
> Sorry, just found ou
Doug,
Although I don't recall a plug in (unless it's one of Microtype's
customization tools), I think if you follow the directions in
C:\Program
Files\Adobe\FrameMaker7.0\OnlineManuals\Customizing_Frame_Products.pdf
that detail how to modify the menu config files, you can remove
whatever you want
I don't see anything in the archive site that implies that FM posts are not
still copyright by the author.
Art
On 1/26/06, Jakob Fix wrote:
> Art,
>
> I know I should refrain from replying ... but ... can't ... must ... answer.
> :-)
>
> On 26/01/06, Art Campbell wrote:
> > Jakob,
> >
> > I be
I'm not a lawyer (and I don't play one on TV, either), but I don't see
how publication in any medium of a URL to an item in a publicly available
archive infringes on the original poster's copyright. It seems to me that
publishing a URL is analogous to publishing the ISBN number for a work
published
> a satisfying answer ("42" anyone?), but I also
> think nobody will be able to tell whether or not
>I put these links in an internal
> document or not. So I think I'm safe, for the moment :-).
Wrong. more than once I've received real voice phone calls from
people who saw my name on a post, did
I can't think of a better reason than what the guide (via Rick)
says.
* Hi Pearl,
* From the FrameMaker "User Guide" page 93:
* "Applying formats from catalogs is the easiest way to change the look
of
* text and to ensure that your documents are formatted consistently.
This
* consistency s
Hello Doug,
> Format menu option in FrameMaker, the Font, Size, and Style options
> disable and/or remove these options
There's a free FrameScript RemoveFontMenu.fsl at
http://www.itl.de/html/englisch/consulting/fsl/itl-pool.html#misc
It removes the "Font" menu from the Format menu
and all contex
Hello Eileen,
Just today I was asked by the IT coordinator of a client, why there is
an upgrade of the well-known FrameScript plug-in within just 10 months
after the last version. You know the rule: "Never change a running
system." Why do you want/need to upgrade at all? Are there any problems
wit
Dear Jakob,
I'm glad that you received useful information from the list. I have had
exactly the same experience. I applaud your thought of sharing this
bounty. However, using gmane.org, you can not do this fairly without
contacting each person who signed up to Framers and asking each of them
for p
Hi, guys...I must have missed something. What IS this MIF washing,
anyway? What problem does it fix and what does it do?
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
John Posada wrote:
>I could get an email from
> someone at your company asking for more information.
>
> If that happens, I WILL be contacting your legal department on
> copyright infringement and I HAVE retained the posts on this thread
> as proof that I don't approve of my posts being used.
>
>
An automated version of the two-aspirin fix:
Save your problem FM file as MIF and open that file to see if the
problem-causing drek has been removed...
Art
On 1/26/06, John Posada wrote:
> Hi, guys...I must have missed something. What IS this MIF washing,
> anyway? What problem does it fix and w
Stuart...that is not even close to what I object to. Posting a fully
formed URL for easier use by list members within the approved list
community and posting a URL in a source I know nothing about, for use
by people I know nothing about, used in a way and context I know
nothing about are two comple
Joe just said what I was thinking -- and more articulately than I think
I might have been.
Jakob's thought was good, but the implementation has risks that appear
not to have been thouroughly considered.
(No fault there; I suspect that we've all been in that position -- I
know that I certainly hav
Jakob Fix wrote:
> Sorry, just found out that Framers is archived publicly with exactly what I
> need:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/framers at lists.frameusers.com/
And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you click on any of these
links, the email is shown as "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so
This is probably all true and just a small maybe its not. However,
I'll bet that Jakob's employers wouldn't want to be the subject of
finding out if it is or not and should his corporate attorney receive
correspondence from me, they'll going to make Jakob question how
important the information in t
If it gets that far, it is only because the request that I made on
this forum was ignored.
Besides...that isn't extortion. That would be if I came out of
nowhere and threatened harm. I'd only be responding to what I
perceive as harm made first to me.
> > going to make Jakob question how important
> And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you
> click on any of these links, the email is shown as
> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the
> address...
I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or
process being proposed internally with me being attr
U,
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
`1234567890-=
~!@#$%^&*()_+
[]\
{}|
;'
:"
,./
<>?
I think that's all the characters I can type. Now that I've typed them, put it
into an email and sent it to the list, please do not ever use these characters
or I will come after you i
I do.
I'm sure I can find issues that you feel are important, to be
trivial. However, I'll be refraining from from saying so because I
also believe that people are allowed to express their concerns even
if I'm not concerned about it.
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for a
Bernard, I think John's point (and mine, anyway) is that information
on the forum is freely given. Some/most of us are professional writers
who get paid for words; if we choose to give some away in this or
other forumns, that's up to us. But they're still our words and we
want them to be under our
I'm totally self employed and count on the list, the users and Framers across
the planet to pay me for what I do. If they don't I can't pay the bills. This
list is one way to promote myself. Again, if you don't want your words used by
others, then don't post to the list. It's really not that tou
Agreed. Freely given. Hence, if you get a penny it's a huge return on the
investment.
Besides, if people stay from others on a list like this it's pretty quickly
known. There are several people on the list that I don't bother to reply to
because off list others have mentioned issue that develop
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:24:32 -0500, Art Campbell
wrote:
>If I were you, I'd ping Jeremy at Omsys, publishers of MIF2Go. If
>anyone knows or could do it, they'd be the guys...
Thanks, Art! The short answer is "No". You cannot convert
Frame .fm files to .mif *without* running FrameMaker. It
wo
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:28:32 -0800 (PST), John Posada
wrote:
>Hi, guys...I must have missed something. What IS this MIF washing,
>anyway? What problem does it fix and what does it do?
We didn't invent this, just made it a lot easier to do, as
a public service (since you don't have to buy Mif2Go
We are using unstructured FM 7.0. Our book contains several chapters. The
files were moved from one location to another location. When the writer
opened up the book, he received an "unresolved cross-reference" message. He
did a Search on the unresolved-cross references and re-submitted the
cross-r
Your intent is to post information or a link to that information that
you know is protected, without consent from the owner. You ask how much
the link is worth. How much is a clear conscience worth or your
reputation with the folks on this list?
> How much is this link worth? And who does it belo
Wouldn't the issue be with mail-archive.com, not with anyone who happens
to publish a URL pointing to mail-archive.com. If mail-archive.com is
archiving posts and making them public without the permission of the
Framers list owners, then they are the ones in violation of copyright.
Someone posting
I agree with John P.
At 11:00 AM -0800 1/26/06, John Posada wrote:
> > And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you
>> click on any of these links, the email is shown as
>> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the
>> address...
>
>I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or
>p
I belong to the TWI (Technical Writers of India)
group. Recently the moderator deplored that some spam
came from the members, only to get reports from the
members that their names and email addresses were used
unkown to them for spamming.
I can't say whether this is a case of assumed name/id.
It
John,
It is highly unlikely you would have any success in suing for copyright
infringement over an archive of a message you sent to a public mailing
list.
As the author of a text, you have certain rights regarding control over
who can make copies, transcribe, etc.
However copyright is not an ab
> From: John Posada [mailto:jposada01 at yahoo.com]
> This is probably all true and just a small maybe its not.
> However, I'll bet that Jakob's employers wouldn't want to be
> the subject of finding out if it is or not and should his
> corporate attorney receive correspondence from me, they'll
Hi,
> >So, to restate my question, is there a "silent option" to open files
> >created in a previous version in 7.x?
You might test Mif2Go. It has a feature to
"Wash via MIF" which works also on book files
and in demo mode. The description in the help
file is below.
Best regards
Winfried
---
On 1/25/06, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Also, sometimes when I use Notepad to edit my Maker.ini file, it
> becomes corrupted. The EOL markers seem to vanish, the whole thing
> becomes a jumble, and Frame doesn't work properly until I restore an
> uncorrupted version of the file. What's up
Jeremy,
On 25/01/06, Jeremy H. Griffith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:14:44 +0100, Jakob Fix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >I guess one could save the old files in MIF, and load them in 7.x,
> >but how can this be automated? DZBatcher? Any other ideas?
>
> Sure. Downloa
Hi all,
would it be possible to write a (or use an existing) tool for saving FM files
(any version) as MIF without the need of the FrameMaker application to be
running?
I know we can use DZbatcher or similar tools, but these require FrameMaker to
be available.
Met vriendelijke groet / kind r
> Ideally, we'd like to upgrade to the latest version of all software,
> including FrameMaker v7.2 and WebWorks ePublisher Pro. However,
> Sourcerer (which we absolutely rely on) does not yet support FrameMaker
> v7.2. So for now we'll stick with Frame v7.1.
I've had several users verify that Sou
Rick, Shlomo,
thanks for your replies.
On 25/01/06, Shlomo Perets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jakob,
>
> You wrote:
>
> >we have the following problem on a couple of machines, with different
> >documents:
> >
> >If, on opening a file with missing figures, the user chooses to skip
> >this (and po
John,
Did any of the 35 who said they use the Character Catalog, especially
the adamant ones, say why this method is preferred? (Sorry, I wasn't
following the thread).
Thanks.
Pearl Rosenberg
TeleHealth Services
- Original Message -
From: John Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesd
Hi Pearl,
From the FrameMaker "User Guide" page 93:
"Applying formats from catalogs is the easiest way to change the look of
text and to ensure that your documents are formatted consistently. This
consistency simplifies making changes later as well as converting documents
to other formats s
Hello,
for some of my recent Frame problems, I received very useful
information through this mailing list. I would like to add references
to these posts to our internal documentation, preferably just a URL
per post. However, I'm not sure this is possible with the Lyris
mailing list software (and
Jakob, not to be a party-pooper, but I'm not real hot on the idea of
my posts possibly making their way into someone's documentation.
> for some of my recent Frame problems, I received very useful
> information through this mailing list. I would like to add
> references to these posts to our inte
John,
On 26/01/06, John Posada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jakob, not to be a party-pooper, but I'm not real hot on the idea of
> my posts possibly making their way into someone's documentation.
ah, a misunderstanding: I intend to use these links just as references
for internal howto documents t
> ah, a misunderstanding: I intend to use these links
> just as references for internal howto documents to be
> shared with colleagues, not as an official documentation
> that will be distributed to clients, if that's
> your concern.
Sorry, Jakob, there was no misunderstanding.
Why? you may ha
John wrote:
-> Why? you may have every intention of not making them public,
-> but once they are in documentation, anything can happen;
-> somepone else recycles what you create not knowing the
-> restrictions, you leave and someone takes over the stuff and
-> doesn't know, it's just an issue I
> Would copying and pasting into internal documetation
> be any better?
> I don't think so.
Chances are that if the information is copied and pasted, not
everything ffrom the message is included...headers, sigs, and other
attributes would be stripped out. A URL includes everything.
I'm not going
John,
On 26/01/06, John Posada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ah, a misunderstanding: I intend to use these links
> > just as references for internal howto documents to be
> > shared with colleagues, not as an official documentation
> > that will be distributed to clients, if that's
> > your conce
> If I'd simply asked for "easy access to previous
> posts via a simple one-URL-per-post scheme instead
> of a long and not always successful
> search in the mailing list archive", you would have
> agreed, or wouldn't you?
If it means a direct URL to a post by non-members out of the control
of
Jakob,
I believe, if you read the copyright notice on frameusers.com, you
will see that ownership of posts is retained by the author. And I
would submit that because the content of the site is copyrighted as a
body, that body-of-work further documents each posting as belonging to
the author.
I ea
If I were you, I'd ping Jeremy at Omsys, publishers of MIF2Go. If
anyone knows or
could do it, they'd be the guys...
Art
On 1/26/06, Wim Hooghwinkel (Scriptware) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> would it be possible to write a (or use an existing) tool for saving FM files
> (any version)
Sorry, just found out that Framers is archived publicly with exactly
what I need:
http://www.mail-archive.com/framers@lists.frameusers.com/
All is well now (except maybe for John P. :-))
--
cheers,
Jakob.
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as
Art,
I know I should refrain from replying ... but ... can't ... must ... answer. :-)
On 26/01/06, Art Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jakob,
>
> I believe, if you read the copyright notice on frameusers.com, you
> will see that ownership of posts is retained by the author. And I
> would su
I'm so glad that the technical ability to do it has superceded the
wishes of people who are taking their time to help other list
members.
I'm sure I can find instructions and links on the web to crack
someone's IT enterprise. That must make it OK too.
--- Jakob Fix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> S
Doug,
Although I don't recall a plug in (unless it's one of Microtype's
customization tools), I think if you follow the directions in
C:\Program
Files\Adobe\FrameMaker7.0\OnlineManuals\Customizing_Frame_Products.pdf
that detail how to modify the menu config files, you can remove
whatever you want
I don't see anything in the archive site that implies that FM posts are not
still copyright by the author.
Art
On 1/26/06, Jakob Fix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Art,
>
> I know I should refrain from replying ... but ... can't ... must ... answer.
> :-)
>
> On 26/01/06, Art Campbell <[EMAIL PROT
I'm not a lawyer (and I don't play one on TV, either), but I don't see
how publication in any medium of a URL to an item in a publicly available
archive infringes on the original poster's copyright. It seems to me that
publishing a URL is analogous to publishing the ISBN number for a work
publishe
> a satisfying answer ("42" anyone?), but I also
> think nobody will be able to tell whether or not
>I put these links in an internal
> document or not. So I think I'm safe, for the moment :-).
Wrong. more than once I've received real voice phone calls from
people who saw my name on a post, did
I can't think of a better reason than what the guide (via Rick)
says.
* Hi Pearl,
* From the FrameMaker "User Guide" page 93:
* "Applying formats from catalogs is the easiest way to change the look
of
* text and to ensure that your documents are formatted consistently.
This
* consistency s
Hello Doug,
> Format menu option in FrameMaker, the Font, Size, and Style options
> disable and/or remove these options
There's a free FrameScript RemoveFontMenu.fsl at
http://www.itl.de/html/englisch/consulting/fsl/itl-pool.html#misc
It removes the "Font" menu from the Format menu
and all contex
Hello Eileen,
Just today I was asked by the IT coordinator of a client, why there is
an upgrade of the well-known FrameScript plug-in within just 10 months
after the last version. You know the rule: "Never change a running
system." Why do you want/need to upgrade at all? Are there any problems
wit
Dear Jakob,
I'm glad that you received useful information from the list. I have had
exactly the same experience. I applaud your thought of sharing this
bounty. However, using gmane.org, you can not do this fairly without
contacting each person who signed up to Framers and asking each of them
for p
Hi, guys...I must have missed something. What IS this MIF washing,
anyway? What problem does it fix and what does it do?
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
___
You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL P
John Posada wrote:
I could get an email from
someone at your company asking for more information.
If that happens, I WILL be contacting your legal department on
copyright infringement and I HAVE retained the posts on this thread
as proof that I don't approve of my posts being used.
Of course, y
An automated version of the two-aspirin fix:
Save your problem FM file as MIF and open that file to see if the
problem-causing drek has been removed...
Art
On 1/26/06, John Posada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, guys...I must have missed something. What IS this MIF washing,
> anyway? What proble
Stuart...that is not even close to what I object to. Posting a fully
formed URL for easier use by list members within the approved list
community and posting a URL in a source I know nothing about, for use
by people I know nothing about, used in a way and context I know
nothing about are two comple
Joe just said what I was thinking -- and more articulately than I think
I might have been.
Jakob's thought was good, but the implementation has risks that appear
not to have been thouroughly considered.
(No fault there; I suspect that we've all been in that position -- I
know that I certainly hav
Jakob Fix wrote:
Sorry, just found out that Framers is archived publicly with exactly what I
need:
http://www.mail-archive.com/framers@lists.frameusers.com/
And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you click on any of these
links, the email is shown as "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that sp
This is probably all true and just a small maybe its not. However,
I'll bet that Jakob's employers wouldn't want to be the subject of
finding out if it is or not and should his corporate attorney receive
correspondence from me, they'll going to make Jakob question how
important the information in t
If it gets that far, it is only because the request that I made on
this forum was ignored.
Besides...that isn't extortion. That would be if I came out of
nowhere and threatened harm. I'd only be responding to what I
perceive as harm made first to me.
> > going to make Jakob question how important
> And to get back to my point from yesterday, if you
> click on any of these links, the email is shown as
> "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> " so that spammers can't get the
> address...
I'm not concerned about spammers. I'm concerned about a solution or
process being proposed internally with me being attr
U,
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
`1234567890-=
[EMAIL PROTECTED]&*()_+
[]\
{}|
;'
:"
,./
<>?
I think that's all the characters I can type. Now that I've typed them, put it
into an email and sent it to the list, please do not ever use these characters
or I will come a
I do.
I'm sure I can find issues that you feel are important, to be
trivial. However, I'll be refraining from from saying so because I
also believe that people are allowed to express their concerns even
if I'm not concerned about it.
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for a
Bernard, I think John's point (and mine, anyway) is that information
on the forum is freely given. Some/most of us are professional writers
who get paid for words; if we choose to give some away in this or
other forumns, that's up to us. But they're still our words and we
want them to be under our
I'm totally self employed and count on the list, the users and Framers across
the planet to pay me for what I do. If they don't I can't pay the bills. This
list is one way to promote myself. Again, if you don't want your words used by
others, then don't post to the list. It's really not that tou
Agreed. Freely given. Hence, if you get a penny it's a huge return on the
investment.
Besides, if people stay from others on a list like this it's pretty quickly
known. There are several people on the list that I don't bother to reply to
because off list others have mentioned issue that develop
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:24:32 -0500, Art Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I were you, I'd ping Jeremy at Omsys, publishers of MIF2Go. If
>anyone knows or could do it, they'd be the guys...
Thanks, Art! The short answer is "No". You cannot convert
Frame .fm files to .mif *without* running
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:28:32 -0800 (PST), John Posada
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, guys...I must have missed something. What IS this MIF washing,
>anyway? What problem does it fix and what does it do?
We didn't invent this, just made it a lot easier to do, as
a public service (since you don't
We are using unstructured FM 7.0. Our book contains several chapters. The
files were moved from one location to another location. When the writer
opened up the book, he received an "unresolved cross-reference" message. He
did a Search on the unresolved-cross references and re-submitted the
cross-r
98 matches
Mail list logo