On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:13:41PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> I suppose a coredump would be nice here, but I didn't have that enabled...
>
> And it turns out that I'm too lazy to actually type in all of the
> arguments, but I'll leave the machine sitting at the backtrace. If anyone
> wan
This is from a kernel with sources from soon after i386/pmap.c 1.423 was
committed, FWIW.
On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> I suppose a coredump would be nice here, but I didn't have that enabled...
>
> And it turns out that I'm too lazy to actually type in all of the
> arguments, b
ok, here goes:
duplicate free from zone FFS1 dinode
traceback:
Debugger
panic
uma_dbg_free
uma_zfree_arg
ffs_ifree
ufs_reclaim
ufs_vnoperate
vclean
gdonel
getnewvnode
ffs_vget
ufs_lookup
ufs_vnoperate
vfs_cache_lookup
ufs_vnoperate
lookup
namei
stat
syscall
Xint0x80_syscall
Whee!
Hi,
> > >The version should be 0.9.5.3 or better (can't remember if I committed .4
> > >or .3).
> >Shouldn't that be 0.9.5.2? I run the latest current, and
> >hw.ath.hal.version is 0.9.5.2.
>
>You're right; I committed a slightly older version to FreeBSD than to Linux.
>The version
The version
On Tuesday, 05 August 2003 14:34, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> > Question for the developers: Is there someway to avoid having the
> > combination of vesa and nvidia cause a total lockup of the machine? I
> > have a feeling I may not be the last person to try
Hi.
This might be of interest to anyone who has tried debugging
multi-threaded programs (of the libc_r variety) with gdb. This has been
bugging me for months, and I finally got frustrated enough to find out
what was going on.
The symptom:
Once you call any function that puts a thread to sleep, th
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> Following John Cagle instructions, I made an trace at db> prompt, the
> result can be viewed at
> http://www.seudns.net/ftp/ale/Pictures/ml370/trace.jpg, the crash can be
> viewed at http://www.seudns.net/ftp/ale/Pictures/ml370/crash_boot.jpg
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marcos Biscaysaqu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I have a prism 2.5 firmaware 1.5.6 but I can't make work this in 11Mbps
The firmware always reports 2Mbps in hostap mode, so the driver always
reports 2mbps. this is a cosmetic issue. it would be better
Gentlemen,
I have been unable to install 5.1, 5 or 4.8 releases on MSI 875P-NEO-FIS2R
motherboard.
I am led to believe, from reading the documentation, that the Intel ICH5R
chipset and the Intel 82547EI (CSA interface) for Lan are not supported.
Is there a foreseeable future when these will be in
> From: Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 16:01:37 -0400
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> --=-MHp9eSkqmbnyoWl+2a1w
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:56, Barney Wolff wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 08:01:30AM -0300, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Terry Lambert wrote:
1) Machines do not ship with it enabled by default; a
Windows user has about as much probability of doing
the necessary work to enable it as they do of making
somethin
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > "Sam" == Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: >> I just have to ask: is this in any way related to the a/b/g network
: >> card in my laptop that shows up as:
: >>
: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:3:0: class
John Baldwin wrote:
On 01-Aug-2003 Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
got the following panic overnight running with all debugging options on
(WITNESS, MUTEX_DEBUG, DIAGNOSTIC, INVARIANTS; WITNESS_SKIPSPIN off):
panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0xc658e130 for > 5 seconds
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
Sta
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> You'll also notice I'm not questioning the _existence_ of ACL. My point
> is that FreeBSD is Unix (no matter what the lawyers say), and people
> don't usually think of ACL when they think of Unix. Ergo, enabling ACL
> by defautl violates POLA.
Not if you never *set* an
On Friday, 8 August 2003 at 10:27:31 +0200, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 10:22:06AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Aaron Wohl" writes:
>>> I just cvsuped -current this afternoon to get about 1 weeks updates.
>>> After that the kernel panics bo
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > He apparently doesn't understand that v6/v4 NATs and proxy servers
> > would let him deploy today ...assuming that the Windows stack was
> > there.
>
> What do you mean "the Windows stack was there"? XP supports IPv6, as
> long as you install it
Hi There,
Following John Cagle instructions, I made an trace at db> prompt, the
result can be viewed at
http://www.seudns.net/ftp/ale/Pictures/ml370/trace.jpg, the crash can be
viewed at http://www.seudns.net/ftp/ale/Pictures/ml370/crash_boot.jpg
As John told me, It looks like a bug that inv
Terry Lambert wrote:
He apparently doesn't understand that v6/v4 NATs and proxy servers
would let him deploy today ...assuming that the Windows stack was
there.
What do you mean "the Windows stack was there"? XP supports IPv6, as
long as you install it, so I assume there's something missing *in* X
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:40:27PM -0500, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote:
> Had to use FFS filesystem since Grub doesn't support UFS.
^^^
UFS1
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
19 matches
Mail list logo
