> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:33:22 -0700
> From: Doug Barton
> Sender: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
>
> On 9/10/2010 1:48 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > another argument about hostapd :) if have access point we must have
> > way to assign IP for AP clients.
>
> To start wit
Bruce Cran wrote:
> Looking through a dmesg from today I noticed that the LAPIC timer is being
> reported as running at 0 Hz:
>
> Event timer "LAPIC" frequency 0 Hz quality 500
Frequency of LAPIC timer is not reported instantly. It requires
calibration to be discovered. Calibration requires time
Nevermind me. That's what I thought why I was getting the same gpart behavior
switching between kernels, with and without DEBUG_LOCKS. Sorry about that.
Same here, gpart hangs on:
3826 gpartCALL __sysctl(0x7fffa250,0x3,0,0x7fffa268,0,0)
3826 gpartSCTL "kern.geom.confxml"
Yuri
Xin LI delphij.net> writes:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On a brand new system I'm trying to allocate new GPT partition with:
>
> gpart create -s gpt ada0
> gpart add -t freebsd-zfs ada0
> And gpart hangs with "g_waitfor_event" with "g_event" spinning 100% of CPU.
>
> Any thoughts? The system is FreeBSD/a
On 9/10/2010 1:48 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
Hi,
another argument about hostapd :) if have access point we must have
way to assign IP for AP clients.
To start with, your assumption is wrong. DHCPd is not *actually* a
requirement, although I admit that practically it is.
Last spring I ma
Looking through a dmesg from today I noticed that the LAPIC timer is being
reported as running at 0 Hz:
Event timer "LAPIC" frequency 0 Hz quality 500
But the correct frequency is still being used in the kernel:
kern.eventtimer.et.LAPIC.frequency=67470437
--
Bruce Cran
___
On 09/10/2010 19:14, jhell wrote:
> On 09/10/2010 14:36, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>> 2010/9/10 Matthew Jacob:
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt
packages at install time, and with a modest amount of effort can
ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/10/2010 14:36, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> 2010/9/10 Matthew Jacob:
>>> I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt
>>> packages at install time, and with a modest amount of effort can
>
I sent this out to the -scsi list earlier today. Testers would be
appreciated for the 6Gb LSI SAS driver.
Please follow up to me or the -scsi list.
Thanks,
Ken
- Forwarded message from "Kenneth D. Merry" -
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:04:38 -0600
From: "Kenneth D. Merry"
To: s...@free
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:06:45 +0200
Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> > As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to
> > do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
> >
> > 1. Get BIND out of the base!
> > 2. If we remove
On Friday, September 10, 2010 4:28:58 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, September 08, 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On a brand new system I'm trying to allocate new GPT partition with:
gpart create -s gpt ada0
gpart add -t freebsd-zfs ada0
And gpart hangs with "g_waitfor_event" with "g_event" spinning 100% of CPU.
Any thoughts? The system is FreeBSD/amd64
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:32:52PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:41:46 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 09:36:19AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 08, 2010 4:14:19 pm Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to
> do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
>
> 1. Get BIND out of the base!
> 2. If we remove it, the command line tools (dig, host, nslookup) go with it.
Dragonfl
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
>> And what about bind too?
>
> As I've said many times, I'm ready to have it out when there is consensus to
> do so. The usual discussion goes like this:
>
> 1. Get BIND out of the base!
> 2. If we
On 9/10/2010 9:54 AM, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/9/10 Matthew Jacob:
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt packages at
install time, and with a modest amount of effort can install prebuilt
packages afterwards.
IMO, such as it is, there should be *less* in the base sys
On 9/10/2010 11:22 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 02:02 PM 9/10/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
In that case I apologize for the misunderstanding. I've used procmail
for many years on the receiving end but was not aware of the ability
to use it in the manner you suggested.
Have the tinderbox send just on
At 02:02 PM 9/10/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
In that case I apologize for the misunderstanding. I've used
procmail for many years on the receiving end but was not aware of
the ability to use it in the manner you suggested.
Have the tinderbox send just one email to a local account, then use
proc
On 9/10/2010 12:54 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 06:57 PM 9/9/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
Normally they are pointed to a local mirror here at Sentex. However,
that server was having hardware problems which I think we have isolated
and resolved now. I will repoint this tinderbox to the local site again
2010/9/10 Matthew Jacob :
> I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt packages at
> install time, and with a modest amount of effort can install prebuilt
> packages afterwards.
>
> IMO, such as it is, there should be *less* in the base system than there
> currently is and more
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 05:29:40PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> David DEMELIER ha scritto:
> > I was surprised to see that there is no DHCP server in base, obviously
> > it's not difficult to fetch the net/isc-dhcp31-server package but for
> > people that would like to setup a new server on FreeBSD
I think not. You are given the opportunity to install prebuilt
packages at install time, and with a modest amount of effort can install
prebuilt packages afterwards.
IMO, such as it is, there should be *less* in the base system than there
currently is and more in ports.
_
Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> On 09/10/2010 15:31, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> It is reported deadlock between event timers and some IPI senders, like
>> TLB invalidation, during switching to/from profiling clock rate. In
>> forthcoming version of event timer patch this problem should not happen.
>> Y
David DEMELIER ha scritto:
> I was surprised to see that there is no DHCP server in base, obviously
> it's not difficult to fetch the net/isc-dhcp31-server package but for
> people that would like to setup a new server on FreeBSD quickly they
> will take some time to learn how packages framework wo
On 09/10/2010 15:31, Alexander Motin wrote:
> It is reported deadlock between event timers and some IPI senders, like
> TLB invalidation, during switching to/from profiling clock rate. In
> forthcoming version of event timer patch this problem should not happen.
> You can get latest version of the
On 09/10/2010 14:40, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:31:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2010-09-10 15:50, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
>>> While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
>>> the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to r
Hi.
Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
> the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
> (presumably the ones to profile the code and optimise). The kernel
> spouts messages about Starting event timers: LAP
Hi folks,
I personally agree that a DHCP client must exists in base, and for
this purpose we have dhclient. However soon I will have a new small
machine that will only work as bind and dhcpd server.
I was surprised to see that there is no DHCP server in base, obviously
it's not difficult to fetch
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 04:31:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2010-09-10 15:50, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> >While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
> >the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
> >(presumably the ones to profile
On 2010-09-10 15:50, Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
(presumably the ones to profile the code and optimise). The kernel
spouts messages about Starting event t
While trying to build math/atlas on a FreeBSD/amd64 9.0-CURRENT r212411,
the kernel hangs at some point when math/atlas tries to run some tests
(presumably the ones to profile the code and optimise). The kernel
spouts messages about Starting event timers: LAPIC @ 1000Hz, HPET @
127Hz; then LAPIC @
On Fri Sep 10 10, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > > hi there,
> > > >
> > > > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in
> > > > co
On Thursday, September 09, 2010 3:50:45 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Thu Sep 9 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > hi there,
> > >
> > > except for arm most archs seem to enforce uart support in conf/DEFAULTS.
> > > is
> > > this really necessary? shouldn
At 06:57 PM 9/9/2010, Doug Barton wrote:
Normally they are pointed to a local mirror here at Sentex. However,
that server was having hardware problems which I think we have isolated
and resolved now. I will repoint this tinderbox to the local site again.
The best way to handle this would be to
34 matches
Mail list logo
