On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, David Syphers wrote:
> On Friday 29 November 2002 12:12 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote:
> >
> > > 2. My machine is a Pentium 166 with only 16 MB of RAM. I'm trying
> > > to rebuild the kernel and so far the compile has
>Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 12:20:38 -0800
>From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>It's often more efficient to use binary installations/upgrades than
>source, on slow machines. For example, I build world on a fast
>machine, mount via NFS and then installworld on my slower machines.
Quite so -- no
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 02:28:35PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >> 3. When trying to rcp files to this machine I get a "rshd: Login
> >> incorrect" error. I have inetd configured and running and a .rhosts
> >> file in place (with proper permissions). I'm assuming this mig
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 02:02:42PM -0600, David Syphers wrote:
> On Friday 29 November 2002 01:32 pm, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> > That should, at least, provide a reasonably valid set of comparisons.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I suppose Robert's results might be abnormally long if -current requires a l
On Friday 29 November 2002 01:32 pm, David Wolfskill wrote:
...
> That should, at least, provide a reasonably valid set of comparisons.
Thanks.
I suppose Robert's results might be abnormally long if -current requires a lot
more memory than -stable, thus requiring a lot of swap, as Kris pointed o
>From: David Syphers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 13:04:47 -0600
[Well, I'm Cc:ing -current anyway -- dhw]
>Out of curiosity, how much slower is a 5.x kernel compilation than a 4.x, on
>average? My 486, 66 MHz and 16 MB RAM, compiles a 4.x kernel in ab
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 3. When trying to rcp files to this machine I get a "rshd: Login
> incorrect" error. I have inetd configured and running and a .rhosts
> file in place (with proper permissions). I'm assuming this might
> be PAM related. Any suggestions?
Can you log in with plain rsh? D
On Friday 29 November 2002 12:12 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote:
>
> > 2. My machine is a Pentium 166 with only 16 MB of RAM. I'm trying
> > to rebuild the kernel and so far the compile has been running for
> > almost 24 hours and it's not f
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:11:42PM -0500, Robert Ames wrote:
> 2. My machine is a Pentium 166 with only 16 MB of RAM. I'm trying
> to rebuild the kernel and so far the compile has been running for
> almost 24 hours and it's not finished yet. Is this to be expected?
Yes. gcc 3.x is slower, and
