buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or alternatively rename the structure to "pc98_partition" or similar. I would advocate the latter. Poul-Henning ===> usr.bin/kdump cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -I/bang

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Takahashi Yoshihiro
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be > more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or > alternatively rename the structure to "pc98_partition" or similar. I think that the

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread phk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takahashi Yoshihiro writes: >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be >> more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or >> alternatively ren

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Takahashi Yoshihiro > writes: > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be > >> more some similar code in

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: > "pc98_partition" is OK, but "mbr_partition" is bogus since partition tables > are not restricted to the MBR -- there is one in every extended partition. > > is similarly OK and is similarly bogus. > > "at386" would be a better prefix/suffix than "mbr" for the non-pc98 pc's.