It is not very simple. However Netgraph/ng_socket.c does something similar.
net_add_domain is called from ngs_mod_event().
However, it is not possible to remove this module because the feature to
remove a domain is missing.
switch (event) {
case MOD_LOAD:
/* Regi
Radoslav Vasilev wrote:
> I'm interested in whether the following could be acomplished:
> there's KLD module, installing some new syscalls in the kernel, as well as
> installing new ``struct ipprotosw'' for some protocol or another(let's
> assume IPPROTO_UDP).
> Could we just add some code in the b
I'm interested in whether the following could be acomplished:
there's KLD module, installing some new syscalls in the kernel, as well as
installing new ``struct ipprotosw'' for some protocol or another(let's
assume IPPROTO_UDP).
Could we just add some code in the begging of the new protocol handler
> Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > No, that's not the reason. I just don't like getting cc's.
>
> That's easily fixed: I recommend /usr/ports/mail/procmail.
>
> You can't expect people on a mailing list to tailor their MUA
> configuration to suit your choices. It's up to you to set up your own
> MUA
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dave Evans writes:
: REPOST, previous message may have failed to get through.
:
: I put -z as an illegal option in /boot.config with the intention of
: disabling autoboot. The prompt is now displayed, but it does not allow
: any keyboard input and does not proceed a
Hi freebsd-hackers list,
I'm new to this list, and first of all want to thank you all for such a nice
system, it's my primary OS (in combination with Mac OS X). Secondly: I have
sound card problems on my laptop (Celeron 850, bla bla bla). I get a strange
message when I start the system :
pcm0:
On 13-Jan-2003 Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
>:
>:
>:On 12-Jan-2003 Matthew Dillon wrote:
>:> While working on an MFC I noticed that sys/compat/svr4/svr4_misc.c
>:> (in CURRENT) is calling cpu_wait() in svr4_sys_waitsys() instead of
>:> vm_waitproc(). I believe it needs to call vm_waitpro
:
:
:On 12-Jan-2003 Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> While working on an MFC I noticed that sys/compat/svr4/svr4_misc.c
:> (in CURRENT) is calling cpu_wait() in svr4_sys_waitsys() instead of
:> vm_waitproc(). I believe it needs to call vm_waitproc(). Can anyone
:> say for sure?
:>
:>
Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> No, that's not the reason. I just don't like getting cc's.
That's easily fixed: I recommend /usr/ports/mail/procmail.
You can't expect people on a mailing list to tailor their MUA
configuration to suit your choices. It's up to you to set up your own
MUA and filters to c
REPOST, previous message may have failed to get through.
I put -z as an illegal option in /boot.config with the intention of
disabling autoboot. The prompt is now displayed, but it does not allow
any keyboard input and does not proceed any further.
(*** don't try this unless you have a way of re
On 12-Jan-2003 Matthew Dillon wrote:
> While working on an MFC I noticed that sys/compat/svr4/svr4_misc.c
> (in CURRENT) is calling cpu_wait() in svr4_sys_waitsys() instead of
> vm_waitproc(). I believe it needs to call vm_waitproc(). Can anyone
> say for sure?
>
> Also, in
The fixit.flp from the 5.0 DP2 cdrom appears to be unusable. When I
attempt to use it after booting from kern.flp it comes up with errors of
the form:
fd0c: hard error reading fsbn 2528 of 2528-2530 (ST0 40 \
ST1 4 ST2 10 cyl 70 hd 0 sec 9)
accompanied by ominous clicking noises from the flo
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-13 11:49:15 -0600:
> In the last episode (Jan 13), Roman Neuhauser said:
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:33:32 -0800:
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
> > > > > To: R
In the last episode (Jan 13), Roman Neuhauser said:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:33:32 -0800:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
> > > > To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTE
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:57:25 -0800:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
> > > > To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > you sent
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-12 21:33:32 -0800:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:48:46PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-01-10 11:32:22 -0800:
> > > To: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > you sent me a copy again, please, don't do
Hi there!
Since a cvsupdate and recompile some time ago, using ElectricFence with
pthread programs got impossible.
just linking the pthread lib and the efence lib to a simple small program
causes a weird error:
Fatal error 'Cannot create kernel pipe' at line ? in file
/usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/
17 matches
Mail list logo
