Hi Kirill!
That's a real myth about Realtek :0)
We're using them on all our FreeBSD machines for over 5 years without
any problems. Driver is working fine.
Speed and reliability is OK. So I for one can even offer to choose them
instead of 3COM as in Russia you can easily get 2 from the 3 3COM c
> "Kirill" == Kirill Ponomarew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kirill> Hi, On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:46:43AM -0300, Pablo Morales
Kirill> wrote:
>> Someone said that the realtek 8029 and 8139 ethernet cards are the
>> worst cards ever made. My boss is planning to make a great buy of
>> this card
usbd is going away in FreeBSD. It will be replaced by devd. Some
support is needed in the usb stack for this to happen, and there may
be some hidden bugs in devd that might preclude it working with usb
(but I kinda doubt it). It is on my list, but if someone wants to
help out, that would be grea
Hello. I've got a box which is booting up just fine with
an IP address, but as soon as I change my adapter to DHCP
and reboot it hangs during the initial network setup.
It seems that my router (a LinkSys 4 port DSL hub) is
sending bad packets and triggering the -1 rule. Then,
the DHCP process jus
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone here knows of a way to force specific programs
to stay resident (not swap) - specifically, I'm trying to see if there's a
way one could keep sshd out of swap, and then execute a shell and some
basic sysadmin tools (ps, top, etc), with the same swap-prevention, so
Folks,
Some were chatting and think that adding some features to usb might be
nice. Mentioned specifically was fixing it so it loads the right driver
on the fly. :-) Also I was thinking we might be able to use mostly or
all devd to catagorize devices in some sensable fashion, thus making the
Andrew Kinney wrote:
> On 25 Mar 2003, at 19:28, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Basically, you don't really care about pv_entry_t's, you care
> > about KVA space, and running out of it.
> >
> > In a previous posting, you suggested increasing KVA_PAGES fixed
> > the problem, but caused a pthreads problem.
Yes me too! I have always found the lack of pam_nss a big omission in
FreeBSD.
Is this under development for 5.1??? I really hope!
Kind Regards,
Reinier Kleipool
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tak Pui LOU
Sent: woensdag 26 maart 2003 19:26
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 08:14, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:18:43PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
> >Well, it's just a home server. I don't mind a few crashes, but security is
> >important for me. What do you think, should I go back to -stable?
>
> If you're willing to put up with a fe
> > Why FreeBSD do not support ldap authentication? (nss_ldap)
> > files, nis, hesiod??? do we live in the past? One of great
> > things in 5.0 release for me, should be this! :)
>
> Wait for FreeBSD 5.1.
Does that mean there will be official support for nss_ldap in FBSD 5.1? Is
it on the -curre
evidently slower than that using pthreads due to more switching penalties?
fhrfo> 2.Is it true that even 5.x has no implementation for inter-process
fhrfo> semaphores that are blocking calling thread only not the whole process
fhrfo> as usually in FreeBSD?
fhrfo> Alex
fhrfo>
On Monday 24 March 2003 11:18, Daniela wrote:
> On Sunday 23 March 2003 20:20, Wes Peters wrote:
> >
> > The reason for creating the 5.0 release is to make it easy for more
> > developers and testers to jump onto the 5.x bandwagon by giving them
> > a known (relatively) good starting point. Quite
On 26 Mar 2003, at 13:29, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> If you have 200M shared memory it takes about 50,000 PV entries per
> process. 20 processes takes 1 million PV entries.
We've got about 11.1 million PV entries to play with, so I went
ahead and made MaxClients 150 just to ensure Apache couldn't
pan
On 25 Mar 2003, at 19:28, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Basically, you don't really care about pv_entry_t's, you care
> about KVA space, and running out of it.
>
> In a previous posting, you suggested increasing KVA_PAGES fixed
> the problem, but caused a pthreads problem.
Will running out of KVA space
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 09:44:14AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thanks for the answers, but why pam_ldap in FreeBSD, if i
> can't authenticate in ldap servers?
You _can_ authenticate. Pluggable _Authentication_ Modules (PAM).
In the PAM model, authenticating is more or less just the a
Thanks for the answers, but why pam_ldap in FreeBSD, if i
can't authenticate in ldap servers?
Sorry, but i can't understand...
You did give me solutions with nis.. nis/gateway... where can
i find a "official" howto? The FreeBSD team do not talk about it.
The last question?
Why FreeBSD do
Lev Walkin wrote:
> What about Solaris' migration towards 1:1 model from the N:M one they
> had supported for years already? Who are insane, Solaris folks (moving
> towards Linux) or Free/NetBSD ones (migrating to the old Solaris'
> behavior)?
It's not the same N:M model as Solaris.
The Solaris m
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Andrew Kinney wrote:
> I'm going to expose my newbness here with respect to BSD
> memory management, but could the number of files served and
> filesystem caching have something to do with the PV Entry usage
> by Apache? We've got around 1.2 million files served by this
>
Hello,
I am trying to install FreeBSD into my personal computer, however I am
receiving error messages during the course of my installation. When I am trying to
install using the floppy method at the final prompt where the istallation program
requests me to put in floppy disk in drive a
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 01:35:37 -0800
Lev Walkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> What about Solaris' migration towards 1:1 model from the N:M one they
> had supported for years already? Who are insane, Solaris folks (moving
> towards Linux) or Free/NetBSD ones (migrating to the old Solaris'
> behav
Vladimir Yu. Stepanov wrote:
Hello !
I have a little question about BPF: how to determine incoming or outgoing
packet given into the user level mode. Current API do not supported this
or I are wrong ?
Unfortunately, there is no way of determining this fact.
However, there is a flag names BIOC
Miguel Mendez wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:57:07 +0300
Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy.
1.Is it true that kernel threads are more "heavy" than userspace
ones (pthread) and hence application with hundreds of threads will
work evidently slower than that using pthreads due to more switch
Alex wrote:
> I was so much enthusiastic about kernel threads implemented in 5.x but
> some ugly rumors spoiled my dreams :0)
> So I want to get if these rumors are myths or not.
5.x does not implement traditional "kernel threads" like you appear
to be thinking about them. Instead, it implements
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:57:07 +0300
Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy.
> 1.Is it true that kernel threads are more "heavy" than userspace
> ones (pthread) and hence application with hundreds of threads will
> work evidently slower than that using pthreads due to more switching
> penalties
24 matches
Mail list logo
