Re: concurrent sysctl implementation

2009-05-08 Thread jt
Ed, Thanks :) I'll be implementing this as discussed over the next few months thanks for the technical detail I've been extremely busy with finals. I will write the list with my thoughts within the next week, sorry for the delay. =jt On May 8, 2009, at 17:41, Ed Schouten wrote: Hi,

Re: fdescfs brokenness

2009-05-08 Thread Jilles Tjoelker
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 11:12:03PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:07:46PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues > > with tar and fdescfs. Part of the problem > > here is tar; I need to rethink some of the > > traversal logic. >

Re: concurrent sysctl implementation

2009-05-08 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi, * vasanth raonaik wrote: > Hello Jt, > > I am a newbee in this alias. I am having a very basic question. It would be > really good if you could give me some of this information. > Could you please elaborate on what is the current architecture of sysctl > implementation and How the concurrenc

Re: bootstrapping gnat GCC on amd64

2009-05-08 Thread xorquewasp
Just an update. Finally managed to get the i386 -> amd64 compiler to compile gcc 4.4.0. It took a few Makefile patches as for some reason, cross compilation breaks gnatmake. About to try to get the amd64 compiler to compile itself and run the test suite. Added a system-freebsd_x86_64.ads profile

Re: fdescfs brokenness

2009-05-08 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:07:46PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Colin Percival recently pointed out some issues > with tar and fdescfs. Part of the problem > here is tar; I need to rethink some of the > traversal logic. > > But fdescfs is really wonky: > > * This is a nit, but: ls /dev/fd/18 s

Re: kthreads and sched_relinquish

2009-05-08 Thread Ryan Stone
Your kernel thread likely has a higher priority than userspace threads. Ryan Stone ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebs

kthreads and sched_relinquish

2009-05-08 Thread Andrew Brampton
Hi, I'm writing a FreeBSD kernel module and I think I really misunderstand something. My module spawns a thread, which should be running while the module is loaded. The thread does some work and then should yield for other threads. However, if there are no other threads waiting, then I would like t

fputsock()/fgetsock() replacement

2009-05-08 Thread Danny Braniss
hi, Since the comment in the kernel is: 'Note: fputsock() is deprecated, see comment for fgetsock().' I'm looking for a replacement, on the other hand, this quote: deprecated Said of a program or feature that is considered obsolescent and in the process of bei

Re: undetected umass device

2009-05-08 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Friday 08 May 2009, Danny Braniss wrote: > > Hi, > > this is a: > > USB to Parallel-ATA bridge(0x0c05), Sunplus Technology Inc.(0x04fc) > > or in english, a nifty dongle that can be connected to ata/sata disk, but > > umass fails to detected it fully, and detaches it. > > > > any hints? q

Re: undetected umass device

2009-05-08 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
On Friday 08 May 2009, Danny Braniss wrote: > Hi, > this is a: > USB to Parallel-ATA bridge(0x0c05), Sunplus Technology Inc.(0x04fc) > or in english, a nifty dongle that can be connected to ata/sata disk, but > umass fails to detected it fully, and detaches it. > > any hints? quircks? > thanks

undetected umass device

2009-05-08 Thread Danny Braniss
Hi, this is a: USB to Parallel-ATA bridge(0x0c05), Sunplus Technology Inc.(0x04fc) or in english, a nifty dongle that can be connected to ata/sata disk, but umass fails to detected it fully, and detaches it. any hints? quircks? thanks, danny _

How to invalidate NFS read cache?

2009-05-08 Thread Konrad Heuer
Hello, sporadically, I observe a strange but serious problem in our large NFS environment. NFS servers are Linux and OS X with StorNext/Xsan cluster filesystems, NFS clients Linux and FreeBSD. NFS client A changes a file, but nfs client B (running on FreeBSD) does still see the old version.