Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Oliver Fehr wrote:
> > Well, the book covers UNIX and DOS, at least on of which can be considered
> > a modern operating system. You be the judge which on ...
>
> Neither. One is not an operating system, but merely a game loader, and
> the other is over 30 years old and d
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Gary T. Corcoran" writes:
>
> >No, I know it's not that easy. We need to be able to do things
> >like have "TransmissionMode=4" on the kldload command line, and
> >have that parse the decimal value 4, and then go into the module
>
>
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Commissionnaires wrote:
> >
> > I am interested in learning about the freebsd operating system, I dont have
> My best advice for a complete novice would be to buy the book "The Complete
> FreeBSD", by Greg Lehey, install the version of FreeBSD on the CD-ROM found
By the wa
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> >
> > The tutorial in DaemonNews has this information, as well as information
> > on minimal implementations of the reqired actions. Obviously the actions
> > for SCSI negotiations don't need to be supported because these
> > negotiations make no sense for an emulator or
Nat Lanza wrote:
>
> Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > If this is meant to be an exercise in writing a CAM HBA driver, then you
> > need to teach your disk-emulation code about the basic SCSI commands
> > (INQUIRY, TEST UNIT READY, etc). The SCSI infrastructure will use these
> > com
Chris Costello wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 30, 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> > No. Anyway, you can set your tab size to whatever you want. So long as
> > it is a _tab_, and not 2 or 4 or 8 spaces. If you're heading into the
> > margin constantly, you should simplify your code, or break it u
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Sergey Babkin wrote:
> >
> > Eh ? I don't quite get how Sun could be associated with Open Firmware.
>
> Probably because they developed it?
Ah, that was my ignorance. never knew that Open Firmware is a trademarked
concept, like Open Source.
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
>
> Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > Tell them that it is a daemon, not a devil. A daemon isn't the devil,
> > nor does it promote the worship of devilry.
> >
> > In Japan, the daemon is viewed as a nice, lovable creature. The
>
> Of course, they don't translate daemon as "
Parag Patel wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:29:53 PDT, Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> >By now, based on the timeframe I've watched you
> >through, I'd say that you should have a board that looks like a plain VGA
> >framebuffer and has a keyboard cable hung out the back, and software up
> >and running.
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Sergey Babkin wrote:
>
> > Maybe I'm completely mistunderstanding the subject, but
> > what about EFI (Extendable Firmware Interface) ? It's the
>
> We're looking at it. Do you really believe in referen
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > > I'd suggest you go talk to Parag Patel, who's just wasted about three
> > > months of his life trying to make SmartFirmware run on _one_ supposedly
> > > well-documented board. Parag is nobody's fool, and I consider his
> > > results pretty representative of the issue.
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > well linuxbios is what I started here, and I pinged some folks on this
> > list about supporting freebsd as well as linux, and got a 'no interest'
> > back from some folks.
> >
> > I'm still up for it. I think it's easy.
>
> I'd suggest you go talk to Parag Patel, who's j
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
>
> Ah, I should also have noted that undelete.exe (which I also fetched
> from simtel) doesn't seem to work for me since it won't operate from
> a DOS box and if I shut down to DOS, the pccard services go away and
> I'm no longer able to mount the smartcard which I'd l
"Gary T. Corcoran" wrote:
>
> "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> >
> > I'm sitting here in Seoul, Korea (which is very nice, by the way) and
> > I've just managed to delete all 82 images of Kyoto off the FAT-12 format
> > Smartcard they were on. Wh!
> >
>
> Way back in the Dark Ages I used to hac
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > "Nicole Harrington." wrote:
> > >
> > > Sad to say.. I have another bad experience with the NEW asus K7A MB. It will
> > > not allow a Mylex AccellRaid 150 to break out of the bootup sequence to
> > > be configured. :(
> >
> > That may be as well due to the bugs in Mylex
"Nicole Harrington." wrote:
>
> Sad to say.. I have another bad experience with the NEW asus K7A MB. It will
> not allow a Mylex AccellRaid 150 to break out of the bootup sequence to
> be configured. :(
That may be as well due to the bugs in Mylex soft. I have used different
Mylex cards on a fe
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> Mike Smith wrote:
> >
> > Actually, there's still a *lot* of work that has to be done to make this
> > work "right" - let me say two things only:
> >
> > "resource allocation"
> >
> > "interrupt routing"
>
> And that's just the start. When it comes to network interfaces, t
Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > > Does this mean we won't get the SMP stuff done next week?
> >
> > I'm back on the 15th (you gain 10 hours coming back) and the SMP
> > meeting isn't until the 16th and 17th. Of course it will. :)
>
> So you are running
"Gary T. Corcoran" wrote:
>
> Sergey Babkin wrote:
> > The partition number does not really matter, what really matters is
> > that Windows wants to be in the very first tracks of the disk. This
> > is legacy left from DOS which always had the same mania.
>
Steven Alexander wrote:
>
> I've had problems getting Windows NT to boot using bootloaders from other
> OSes. I'd suggest installing NT last and putting it on the first partition.
The partition number does not really matter, what really matters is
that Windows wants to be in the very first trac
James Howard wrote:
>
> Since I mention it, does anyone know the major differences between SCO's
> new SVR5 (Unixware 7) and traditional SVR4 implementations? Going to
> SCO's website all I get is market-speak.
As I've been told it was named SVR5 to mark inclusion of enterprise-level
features (
Alexander Langer wrote:
>
> Thus spake Sergey Babkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > compiled in the kernel (as opposed to being loaded as a module)
> > then it never gets unloaded. And many drivers were written before
> > the loadable modules appeared.
>
> Yes.
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sergey Babkin writes:
> : # If a driver returns a success code which is less than zero, it must
> : # not assume that it will be the same driver which is attached to the
> : # device. In particular, it must not assume t
Alexander Langer wrote:
>
> Thus spake Alexander Langer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > If so, I'm going to write patches.
>
> ... for almost every driver in the tree.
>
> Hmm. EITHER almost all people never unloaded their driver, or I still
> understood wide parts wrong.
>
> I grepped through /sy
Jonathan Laventhol wrote:
>
> Dear FreeBSD Hackers --
>
> I've got a technically-straightfordward but nonetheless
> business-critical problem with the groups structures in FreeBSD
> which perhaps you kind souls can help me with.
> We currently use FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE through 4.0-RELEASE via
> Wa
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sergey Babkin writes:
> : The code seems to guarantee that if the probe routine returns 0
> : then the attach routine will be called right away. So if the probe
> : routine returns 0 they don't have to be freed.
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> One should generally only call these functions in attach. If you must
> call them in probe, one must release the resource before returning
> from the probe. However, since they can affect bridge settings, it
> may be unavoidable to call them from the probe routine.
The c
Hi,
I've been reading recently some stories about the licensing
issues and that brought me to an interesting conclusion:
apparently, we are able to change the license of the Digiboard
driver from GPL to BSD ? It does not seem to be that much important
any more as these cards are obsolete, but st
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> * Ville-Pertti Keinonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000511 22:49] wrote:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FengYue) writes:
> >
> > > loop. Now, the third program reads 4K of data from /tmp/pagetest
> > > and exit if the 4K data does not contain all 'A's nor 'Z's. 3 programs
> > >
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sergey Babkin writes:
> : Seems like most of the modern machines just don't have that
> : pin on the PCI bus connected anywhere. But on most of them
> : (though not all) the pin on ISA works. Some high-end machines
Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> On 2000-May-11 07:10:27 +1000, Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >And if you force the IOCHK* line on an AT slot to GND? Would that work
> >on modern PCI machines?
>
> Grounding IOCHK* does cause an NMI on the only PCI machine I've tried
> it on. It looks like thi
Dragos Ruiu wrote:
>
> I'll try asking here now
>
> I have a freebsd system(3.4S) on a KVM and every time the monitored
> system is switched, the mouse driver gets fuxored, and when you switch
> back to the system the driver starts outputting oodles of the following
> messages to syslog
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> The cvsupit package is now updated to deal with the current branch
> state of affairs, the cvsup 16.1 upgrade AND it's linked-to properly
> so that simply:
By the way, a stupid question: I've received a 4-CDROM
package today, saying 4.0-March 2000. The line on the
sh
Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 03:59:52PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Does anybody know of tools to read a Digital Unix "vdump" tape on FreeBSD?
> > I have a number of such tapes, and would prefer to read them on an (Intel)
> > FreeBSD box instead of having to reinstall DU
Hi,
A while ago I tried to install StarOffice and had
a problem that every time I tried to start it it went
into setup again and again. I've asked about this
in -hackers and found that some people had the same
problem but nobody has a solution. Well, I've found that
solution today and in case any
Dennis wrote:
> the people buying linux servers from VAR research and the like dont care
> about source, they care about functinality. Thats why BSDI doesnt get it.
> its not about the source, its about the price. People perceive that BSD/OS
> and FreeBSD are substantially similar in functionalt
Christian Gusenbauer wrote:
>
> Hi David!
>
> I'm sorry for you, but FBSDBOOT will never support ELF binaries :-(! As
> developer of this utility I had a discussion about supporting ELF when ELF was
> introduced into FreeBSD. The reason, why ELF support was not integrated is, that
> the new boot
Brian Beattie wrote:
>
> I have an old pen computer that runs msdos. It has a keyboard and a
> floppy and I would like to use it to hook up a serial console. Dose
> anybody have a recomendation for a terminal program that I can download,
> or directions on using kermit to connect to com2.
As f
Martin Cracauer wrote:
>
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> > Would be interesting to tell how you managed to produce a bootable floppy
> > with the subsequent scripting that starts the OS and all that.
>
> The trick I used is that I have a custom `init` binary, which looks a
Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> I would love to make a port of this, for reasons that become obvious once you
> see the page. (Think of all the mailing list archives and mirrors)
>
> http://www.totse.com/DeCSS/
>
> Be sure to read it before commenting, it's not what you might think.
I can't help keepin
Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2000 at 04:00:28PM -0600, David Scheidt wrote:
>
> > > Generally speaking 'joining' machines into cluster(like) you want to
> > > use differential SCSI buses.
> >
> > Yes. Of course, I think that you want to use differential SCSI for
> > everything. Cable
Olaf Hoyer wrote:
>
> >a. settings on the controller card (e.g. scsi id, termination)
> >b. freebsd configuration on the initiator and target PCs.
> > (e.g. do we use scsi_pt.c, scsi_target.c, etc).
> >
> >here's a diagram depicting what we want to do. we're trying to setup
> >a PC (PC2 below)
Bill Maniatty wrote:
> > Shanley and Anderson: PCI System Architecture (2nd Ed)
> > ISBN 1-55860-069-8 small rip in paperback cover
>
> I teach operating systems, and would like to add a device driver writing
> component to the curriculum. I could use this one.
There was a good (though somewha
Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> I have a block on a SCSI disk (Fujitsu M2954S-512 )
> which I cannot write to - fsck hangs eternally.
>
> Besides from trying the SCSICNTL utility from Adaptec
> (which I had to boot off of a DOS floppy) is
> there a way of formatting a drive from being
> booted und
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> Writing documentation is a resource-sucking nuisance; supporting outdated
> documentation even more so. The BSD driver model is sufficiently simple
I think that there might be a compromise
solution: when someone learns the interface
from analysing the code he might as well
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I've got one currently and my FreeBSD box can do 3000-3300kBytes a second
> without any complaints..
>
> Full duplex has it's advantages, no doubt
I don't think that you realy need a switch to achieve
this speed on an empty network. With two machines
connected to a
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> I picked up a nifty little D-Link DSS-5+ 5-port 10/100 switch today
> CompUSA had a 5-port network kit labeled 'DFE-910' which had the
> DSS-5+ and two DFE-530TX+ NIC Cards ('rl' driver), plus cables, for $130.
>
> It appears to operate quite nicely. I
Eduardo Viruena Silva wrote:
>
> O! wise FreeBSD gurus!
> I ask for your advice...
>
> I have a FreeBSD 3.3 system in a Pentium computer and an old 486
> computer that I want to make a diskless system.
>
> I found that in directory: /usr/src/sys/i386/boot/netboot
> there is a way of building
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :> If you have a genuine need for 500Gig of news spool,
> :
> :This is roughly 10 days of newsfeed, btw.
>
> This is roughly 20 days of newsfeed if one take the porn, warez, and
> binaries groups, which contain mostly junk, and try to hold onto them
> fo
Michael Beckmann wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 03:34:53PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > :OK, so I know now that I can have pretty large files in the Terabyte range.
> > :Very nice. But I assume I cannot mmap anything like a 100 GB file ?
> > :
> > :Michael
> >
> > Intel cpu's only hav
Chuck Youse wrote:
>
> I admittedly haven't done much homework on this topic, but I was wondering
> if anyone has played with the idea of implementing ACLs on top of UFS.
>
> One of the weakest areas in UNIX is its lack of fine-grained access
> control for resources - the biggest resource being,
Mike Smith wrote:
>
> > anybody got some reliable, tested, known-good code for getting back to
> > real mode? I'm to the point where I have a working GDT, and paging is
> > turned off, but the last step -- turning off protection enable -- is not
> > working for me.
>
> You want to be more explic
Narvi wrote:
>
> See LINT on details of how to wire down scsi devices...
>
> Your proposal doesn't take adding a second scsi card into account.
UnixWare has a kind od solution for this: when they create
the VTOC table (an analog of the BSD disk label) on the disk
they have a field in it that co
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Has anyone looked at netscape Communicator 4.7 for FreeBSD???
>
> I just installed it.
> the binary is 13234176 bytes long!!
> yes folks, that's 13 MB!
>
> stripped!
> With shared libraries!
>
> It runs but it's quite easy to make your xserver run out of memory (or
>
Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> > We've got a similar problem. Instals fine as root, runs
> > fine a 'joe', but if anyone else tries to run it they get
> > the setup screen! My hunch is that it's something to do with
> > permissions on Sys5 IPC queues or something. A Ktrace of both
> > showed that d
Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 08:46:42PM -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have got a surprising problem with StarOffice 5.1
> > > for Linux on FreeBSD 4.0-current, the latest snapshot.
> > > The CD-ROM installation went fine (after I configured the
> > >
Kevin Day wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have got a surprising problem with StarOffice 5.1
> > for Linux on FreeBSD 4.0-current, the latest snapshot.
> > The CD-ROM installation went fine (after I configured the
> > Posix real-time thread support and linked the
> > additional libraries to the Lin
David Scheidt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Sergey Babkin wrote:
>
> > > There is no worm or wormlike support in the SCSI system anymore.
> >
> > Do I need to configure the SCSI target driver for cdrecord or
> > does it just use the CD-ROM driver ? Thank yo
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> It seems Sergey Babkin wrote:
> > Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > > > Anyhow, I have some changes to the worm stuff, it needs to be dealt with
> > > > > to handl
Hi,
I have got a surprising problem with StarOffice 5.1
for Linux on FreeBSD 4.0-current, the latest snapshot.
The CD-ROM installation went fine (after I configured the
Posix real-time thread support and linked the
additional libraries to the Linux compatibility
directory and slightly corrected
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
> It seems Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > Anyhow, I have some changes to the worm stuff, it needs to be dealt with
> > > to handle modern HW, and to deal with all the possible block formats
> > > thats possible on a CD nowadays. It will probably mean the death of
> > > the worm s
Mark Ovens wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 08:45:31PM -0400, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> >
> > A funny thing is that Microsoft is porting essentially a
> > 32-bit version of Windows to Merced. All the programs for
> > Windows that want to use 64-bit support will have
Mark Ovens wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 1999 at 08:45:31PM -0400, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> >
> > A funny thing is that Microsoft is porting essentially a
> > 32-bit version of Windows to Merced. All the programs for
> > Windows that want to use 64-bit support will h
Zuidam, Hans wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The IA64 (merced) is a kind of VLIW (Very Large Instruction Word)
> processor. It is basically a complete new kind of systems architecture
> with a i686 (and of course a i586, ..., 4004) slapped on the side. The
> original processor design was done by HP. See:
>
Jim Bryant wrote:
> > I really don't know how people get started with this. HP has _never_ stated
> > that the chip will handle it; all they have stated is that HPUX applications
> > will continue to be supported.
> >
> > I suggest you people go read comp.arch for a while; there's a fair bit of
>
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> Microsoft needs a "business quality" version of Windows,
> which it claims is Windows/2000. That version of Windows
> could benefit from a 64-bit port, if for marketing only; but
> I don't think it would result in the volume of sales Intel
> is looking for.
A
Zuidam, Hans wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The IA64 (merced) is a kind of VLIW (Very Large Instruction Word)
> processor. It is basically a complete new kind of systems architecture
> with a i686 (and of course a i586, ..., 4004) slapped on the side. The
> original processor design was done by HP. See:
Jim Bryant wrote:
> > I really don't know how people get started with this. HP has _never_ stated
> > that the chip will handle it; all they have stated is that HPUX applications
> > will continue to be supported.
> >
> > I suggest you people go read comp.arch for a while; there's a fair bit of
Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> Microsoft needs a "business quality" version of Windows,
> which it claims is Windows/2000. That version of Windows
> could benefit from a 64-bit port, if for marketing only; but
> I don't think it would result in the volume of sales Intel
> is looking for.
A
Alexey M. Zelkin wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> Which tools can be used to edit syscons fonts ?
Any of the tools you use to edit the DOS fonts.
My favorite one it Evafont by Pete Kvitek. But
there were a lot of tools floating around.
-SB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscrib
Alexey M. Zelkin wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> Which tools can be used to edit syscons fonts ?
Any of the tools you use to edit the DOS fonts.
My favorite one it Evafont by Pete Kvitek. But
there were a lot of tools floating around.
-SB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe f
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <37a3b701.851df...@softweyr.com> Wes Peters writes:
> : Do we have a list of all services that use bpf? I'm willing to edit the man
> : pages, given a list. I guess I could just grep-o-matic here, huh?
>
> Yes. I'm also in a holding off pattern until we know t
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes:
> : Do we have a list of all services that use bpf? I'm willing to edit the man
> : pages, given a list. I guess I could just grep-o-matic here, huh?
>
> Yes. I'm also in a holding off pattern until we know the exact imp
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
>
> <37a30852.20e5a...@bellatlantic.net>Sergey Babkin writes:
> >> Any suggestions, anyone?
> >
> >Modify the POP daemon to use your mySQL database in addition to getpwent ?
> >That seems to be the easiest way that should not break
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sergey Babkin writes:
> >> Any suggestions, anyone?
> >
> >Modify the POP daemon to use your mySQL database in addition to getpwent ?
> >That seems to be the easiest way that should not break anything else.
>
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm going to implement a large mail-box, with several hundreds of mail-only
> users. They should never access anything besides their POP3 mailboxes and
> change password via (SSLed) web interface.
>
> So, I don't want to add all of them to /etc/passwd.
>
>
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <37a25361.34799...@bellatlantic.net> Sergey Babkin writes:
> : Disabling bpf it will break rarpd (and also rbootd but it is less
> : important). I think such a thing should be mentioned in documentation.
>
> Not if they are started be
Alex Povolotsky wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> I'm going to implement a large mail-box, with several hundreds of mail-only
> users. They should never access anything besides their POP3 mailboxes and
> change password via (SSLed) web interface.
>
> So, I don't want to add all of them to /etc/passwd.
>
>
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sergey Babkin writes:
> : Disabling bpf it will break rarpd (and also rbootd but it is less
> : important). I think such a thing should be mentioned in documentation.
>
> Not if they are started before the secure lev
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message
> "Brian F. Feldman" writes:
> : And how about having
> : if (securelevel > 3)
> : return (EPERM);
> : in bpf_open()?
>
> There are no security levels > 3. I'd be happy with > 0. This is
> consistant with the meaning of "raw devices".
Dis
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F.
>Feldman" writes:
> : And how about having
> : if (securelevel > 3)
> : return (EPERM);
> : in bpf_open()?
>
> There are no security levels > 3. I'd be happy with > 0. This is
> consistant with the meaning of
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> Mike Hoskins wrote:
> >
> > This isn't a comment meant to contribute to the overcommit holy war
> > (opinion mode: I think FreeBSD should overcommit, or at worst have a
> > sysctl and default to overcommit - admins who don't want overcommit can
> > then hang themselves)
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> Mike Hoskins wrote:
> >
> > This isn't a comment meant to contribute to the overcommit holy war
> > (opinion mode: I think FreeBSD should overcommit, or at worst have a
> > sysctl and default to overcommit - admins who don't want overcommit can
> > then hang themselves
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> Sergey Babkin wrote:
> >
> > I want to propose a simple substitution for ACLs. No, here
> > is no patch yet but I'm ready and willing to do it. The reason
> > why I want to discuss it first is that this is a Political Thing.
> >
Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
>
> Sergey Babkin wrote:
> >
> > I want to propose a simple substitution for ACLs. No, here
> > is no patch yet but I'm ready and willing to do it. The reason
> > why I want to discuss it first is that this is a Political Thing.
> >
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 12:20 AM +0900 7/15/99, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > In which case the program that consumed all memory will be killed.
> > The program killed is +NOT+ the one demanding memory, it's the one
> > with most of it.
>
> But that isn't always the best process to have kil
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> At 12:20 AM +0900 7/15/99, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > In which case the program that consumed all memory will be killed.
> > The program killed is +NOT+ the one demanding memory, it's the one
> > with most of it.
>
> But that isn't always the best process to have ki
Hi!
I want to propose a simple substitution for ACLs. No, here
is no patch yet but I'm ready and willing to do it. The reason
why I want to discuss it first is that this is a Political Thing.
And if the Core Team decides that it's a Bad Thing, I suppose
it will never get commited to the system.
Hi!
I want to propose a simple substitution for ACLs. No, here
is no patch yet but I'm ready and willing to do it. The reason
why I want to discuss it first is that this is a Political Thing.
And if the Core Team decides that it's a Bad Thing, I suppose
it will never get commited to the system.
Hi!
I have tried to install 3.1 on two machines but on both of
them I was not able to boot it after installation. The
3.0-snapshot from May-98 worked fine on both of them.
But 3.1 did not boot. First, the MBR boot manager was not able to
boot any partition, nor FreeBSD nor UnixWare. After I repla
Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> >What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
> >too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
> >since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
> >I have is way too old, for example).
> >
>
201 - 291 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
