ould be even further
> from my focus: I'm not really a developer; I don't write Qt
> applications. I merely wanted to be able to handle PGP-compatible
> signing & encryption in mutt.
>
> In any case: Thank you *very* much for your help. I doubt I would
> have made th
tever that would
list each available option for the port and exactly what it did would
prove useful. It certainly would not be a burden as over 90% of the
ports that have either none or just one or two options. Besides, if
some maintainer created a port with 40 or 50 configurable opti
ed in the UPDATING file?
what is the output of: "pkg_info -R ruby-1.9\* and "pkg_info -R
ruby-1.8\*" if you still have it installed?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or g
t have /tmp in my $PATH.
Information for portupgrade-devel-20130313_1,3:
Depends on:
Dependency: libyaml-0.1.4_2
Dependency: openssl-1.0.1_8
Dependency: libffi-3.0.13
Dependency: libexecinfo-1
sticky bit set. If
> you use:
>
> chmod 1777 /tmp
>
> it ought to all work.
I have the directory chmod set to "1777" and I still receive the error.
It has been set at that for over two
On Sun, 19 May 2013 13:34:49 -0500
sindrome articulated:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Chris Rees
> wrote:
>
> > On 19 May 2013 16:52, "Jerry" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 19 May 2013 09:57:52 -0500
> > > sindrome articulated:
> > &
>
> Here the output :
{truncated}
You would be better served by reporting this to: .
You might also want to file a PR against it. I would suggest that you
do a "make clean" first, update your ports tree and then try to
rebuild the port with its default config settings. You can use
from. At least it
doesn't appear to be causing any problems.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Bershere's Formula for Failure:
We need a flag for:
DON'T_EVEN_THINK_ABOUT_USING_QT3= yes
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freeb
and most of them are about to go away also.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd
ning depends are for:
> finance/qtstalker
> textproc/xxdiff
The security/pinentry port in its standard configuration requires
security/pinentry-qt which requires x11-toolkits/qt33 also.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore t
ot; file:
# editors/kate
.if $(.CURDIR:M*/editors/kate)
DEBUG_FLAGS = -ggdb
CFLAGS += ${DEBUG_FLAGS}
WITH_DEBUG = YES
.endif
Is there anything else I have to do to get the port build and installed
with debug symbols?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:45:36 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
> On 29/04/2013 12:13, Jerry wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 22:25:23 -0700
> > Xin Li articulated:
> >
> >> This is weird. We do have some similar construct for the server
> >> package -- if t
h.
In any case, this is the first time this has happened in over 12 years
of using and updating "openldap". It may have just been a fluke.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followup
hough. The only
thing that comes to mind is that I DID NOT shut down openldap prior to
updating it. That never caused a problem before though.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-l
it up and running? I don't want to file a PR if I am the only user with
this problem.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the
is available in the ports
system. The latest official Stable release: 1.6.2 was released on March
18, 2013.
> How do I know whether what usb printers commonly support Freebsd?
You could ask on the "CUP" forum or check the documentation.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups ge
om scratch
and start over clean. It isn't worth the effort it takes to keep it
running anymore.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
_
ation phase.
Unless you happen to suffer from a catastrophic power failure and don't
have a functional UPS installed. In that case, you will probably have
to do a forcible uninstall of all of the affected ports and start over.
"pkg_delete -dfv " works for me.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclai
On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:55:01 +0200
Matthias Apitz articulated:
> El día Wednesday, April 10, 2013 a las 03:44:00PM -0400, Jerry
> escribió:
>
> > I don't have that installed. As far as I can tell, I don't have any
> > QT3\* ports installed. The closest I can find i
e "QT3" from the ports.
It is always causing a problem for me.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
ild log is available here:
<http://www.seibercom.net/logs/kopete-kde4.txt>
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the
e most appreciated.
> Is there any dependency is there for install *FREEBSD PORTS*. Please
> help me to resolve this issue.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
ports system. I will agree that
"sa...@freebsd.org" is probably an over achiever, but it is an example
of what can be accomplished, and in virtual real time no less, when
someone dedicates themselves to a task.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-
testing. It appears to me that the port is abandoned.
We have ports like "Postfix" that are updated in virtual real time and
then we have ports that seem to orphaned. It is too bad we cannot find
a nice happy medium.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list fo
The port version of curl is "7.24.0_2". On February 6th. curl-7.29.0
was released. Is there any possibility that this port might be updated.
A lot of "imap" support was added to this version. The 7.24 version was
released over a year ago (01/24/12).
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: of
g, except if you find one that won't compile. I
originally found 5 of them, but by contacting the maintainers, the
problems were rectified.
As a side note, I don't understand why the base system hasn't been
updated. It would certainly help to eliminate problems like this.
--
Jerry
ll but vocal group that
suffers from "Neophobia". There is no known cure.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
_
to eliminate multiple votes from the same IP I believe.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebs
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013 11:33:06 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
> PDF wasn't designed for editing from the first place. But Adobe
> decided to f..k up their own standard and added extensions to create
> PDF with forms.
*Citation needed
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list fo
wever, on n MS Windows system, I have had
excellent results which is why I usually delegate my PDF work to
Windows.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please d
s and bug
fixes. Are there any plans to update the ports version?
Thanks!
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
-- {/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portlint}. Check out its 'man'
page. It is a very useful tool for checking 'Makefiles' in the ports
system.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ign
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:54:20 +0100
Heino Tiedemann articulated:
> Now wh have the new FreeBSD 9.1 RELEASE - is there hope for an actual
> Gimp?
There is always hope. There is also Scotch.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not igno
"openssl-dev" forum for further details. In the case
of Postfix, you can have your clients disable the use of port 587. It
should work until a proper fix is issued.
And yes, there is a PR against this port.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:03:07 + (UTC)
Michael Grimm articulated:
> Jerry wrote:
>
> > I updated openssl on my system and ran into this bug:
> >
> > As noted numerous times on the openssl-dev list, OpenSSL 1.0.1d is
> > broken. You need to grab
> &g
uot; and
"portmaster" bitched about the conflict with "bash". I had the
"bash-devel" port installed at the time. I am not sure if it was that
actual port or one in the chain though.
If I had a test machine available, I would change the "bash" port and
then
ied to the port version?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
am not sure if I should report this as a possible bug or not. I was
forced to remove the "bash-devel" port and revert to the "bash" port in
order to allow the builds to continue.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list repl
th ruby 1.9.x and ruby 1.8.x installed. Obviously portmaster
is not finding the 1.8.x version. Also, has the "devel/py-krosspython"
port been fixed so that it does correctly build with ruby 1.9.x?
Other than removing the ruby 1.9.x version from my system, and
obviously correcting the depende
I just updated to KDE Version 4.9.5 as described in the UPDATING file.
KDE starts; however, all of my desktop icon and shortcuts are gone.
What could have happened to them? Also, the key
combination no longer functions.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get
default :)
I concur. I rarely modify the port unless I have a specific reason for
doing so.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Ple
n the port and specifically what it
did or how it effected the operation of the application, it would prove
beneficial to the end use. Just my 2¢ on the matter.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Pleas
please let me know.
I use "phpMyAdmin" occasionally on my system. I would have no problem
with creating a new port for the 4.x branch, although you might want to
keep the 3.x branch in the ports system for awhile.
Just my 2¢.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list r
Presently "net/remmina" is at version "0.9.3" in the ports system.
According to the projects web site, Remmina 1.0 was released February
11, 2012. Is there any possibility of having the ports version updated
to this release? The present version is nearly a year old.
--
Jerr
ONS
> - Modernize style, reformat/indent
>
> I am open for suggestions or even better patches/PRs!
+1
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies
le" branch, he my do so.
I was also thinking of another option; however, I do not know if it is
feasible. It would require having a base level set for the patch level
-- in this case 37. Have that as the default. Then have an option to
download all available patches and update bash. I don'
ke the project. Written in 'C', it
didn't require any other libraries or languages to be installed. A
real "light weight" yet "heavy duty" management tool.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore th
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:12:00 -0500
Glen Barber articulated:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 06:15:45AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:32:49AM -0500, Jerry wrote:
> > > Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's
> > &
On Sat, 05 Jan 2013 12:18:11 +0100
Koop Mast articulated:
> On 5-1-2013 2:17, Adriaan de Groot wrote:
> > On Friday, January 04, 2013 07:24:28 PM Jerry wrote:
> >> Following the directions in UPDATING, I used the following command:
> >>
> >>portupgrade -
obvious reason for the build failure. I tried it three
times including doing a distclean and updating the ports tree.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-T
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:04:30 -0600
Corey Halpin articulated:
> On 2013-01-03, Jerry wrote:
> > "Fetchmail" was recently updated to version: "6.3.24". The port
> > version is "6.3.22". The new version fixs some regressions and plug
> > the Op
Bash is currently at Bash-Release: 4.2, patch level 42. The port's
version is only at patch level 37, which was released on 16-Jul-2012.
This is an important port and since the freeze is over with, I was
wondering if this port will be updated?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups g
il/files/branch_7-alpha/>.
I was wondering if the port version might be updated and if there is
any intention to make a port version for the 7 alpha branch?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Plea
ack
yet; however, considering it is a holiday I really would not expect to
get any feedback until later this week anyway.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the
I was not able to find the application "automx"
<http://www.automx.org/en/> in the ports system. Does anyone know if it
is listed under a different name or if someone is working on a possible
port of this application?
Thanks!
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-lis
ure if the port maintainer
has an interest in this port any longer. It is a major port and really
deserves to have a maintainer who has both the time and desire to keep
it current.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To
box just fine from an MS Windows machine, I am no longer
interested in getting a native FreeBSD version of Drobbox; although, I
do think it would be a worthwhile endeavor nevertheless.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore t
n the program under Windows and have it
access the files I wanted to work with on my FreeBSD machine quite
nicely. Evidently I will not be requiring a FreeBSD version after all.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Re
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:32:57 +0100
Frank Staals articulated:
> Jerry writes:
>
> > I was asked about the feasibility of setting up Dropbox
> > <https://www.dropbox.com/install?os=lnx> on a FreeBSD machine,
> > specifically under KDE if possible. I found three re
ve any experience with this software or
specific information on it?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
Every solution breeds new pr
The current Bash-4.2 in the ports is only current to patch level 37.
Now that the port freeze is over, can the port be updated to level 39
which is the current level?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
ill update Perl and rebuild any dependencies. It is my preferred
solution.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
isn't a matter of replacing it, it is a matter of making it work.
It works fine on Windows and Ubuntu and from what I have been told,
most other flavors of Linux. Therefore it doesn't take a frigging
Einstein to deduce where the problem lies. Of course, it is always
easier to blame the
On Thu, 04 Oct 2012 05:30:06 -0800
Beech Rintoul articulated:
> On 10/1/2012 11:56 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> > 01.10.2012 21:33, Jerry wrote:
> >> I just finished installing "linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238".
> >> For some inexplicable reason, it is n
know that this will piss off some people;
however, when someone asks, "Why do you use Microsoft instead of
open-source software", you can point to crap like this being an
excellent reason. IMHO, the only reason for crap like this is because
it is easier to ignore the problem than fix it.
--
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:06:53 -0300
marcos alves articulated:
> 2012/10/1 marcos alves
> > 2012/10/1 Jerry
> >
> >> I just finished installing "linux-f10-flashplugin-11.2r202.238".
> >> For some inexplicable reason, it is no longer working. I followed
&g
mmand
without results. In fact, now nothing is listed in the directory and
flash still doesn't work. Every time I reach a page that requires flash,
I am greeted with a message telling me I need to download and install
it.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ge
ove
forward with our thinking and not chain ourselves to the past.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
TLC announced that "Honey Boo Boo&q
;build or run dependencies" in my vocabulary.
Nor does it indicate, or at least not to me anyway, that you
actually rebuilt all required run or build dependencies. Sorry about
the misunderstanding. I'll leave you to figure out the problem yourself.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list
l -y -p" It will do all of that automatically for you
and provide you with a log file should something not work as expected.
Just a thought.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Plea
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 18:56:22 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
> On 22 September 2012 15:22, Jerry wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:43:29 -0400
> > Steve Wills articulated:
> >
> >> Please see the 20120908 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
> >
> > Been there,
_1" is currently linked against to install
"libotr-3.2.1" so that I can update "kdenetwork-4.8.4" to the latest
version? Apparently, deleting a previously installed version of
"libotr-4.0.0" is the only way to eliminate this problem.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list f
why would or should I downgrade my present installation
of to libotr-3.2.1 to update kdenetwork-4.8.3_1 to
kdenetwork-4.8.3_2 when libotr-4.0.0 apparently works fine with the
older version? It just doesn't seem to make any sense. Is this a bug in
the "make" routine.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclai
se system. Thank God that everyone isn't as
narrow minded as that. Imagine if we all hated people simple because of
their skin color or religion ... or do we?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
P
Please rebuild APR at last with one DBD backend (MYSQL, PGSQL or
> > SQLITE)
> >
> > Hope then is is more clear.
.if $(.CURDIR:M*/www/apache22)
APACHE22_WITH_BDB_VER=48
WITH_EXPERIMENTAL_PATCHES=yes
.endif
How would I specify it now with the new framework?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaim
"-n" flag to get the program to run. The
sysutils/k3b-kde4 port might also have the same limitation. I have not
actually checked it out.
Is there any specific reason why the port(s) cannot build with the
sysutils/cdrtools-devel port?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get
d that "openssl-1.0.1_3" has been updated to
"openssl-1.0.3_4". I wonder if the maintainer asked Doug's permission
first.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:42:38 -0700
Doug Barton articulated:
> Umm ... wow. I'll try to respond substantively below.
>
> On 07/29/2012 04:46, Jerry wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
> > Doug Barton articulated:
> >
> >> Completely asid
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 16:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Doug Barton articulated:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Jerry wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:14:25 -0700
> > Doug Barton articulated:
> >
> >> On 07/25/2012 08:03, Michael wrote:
> >>> Hello obrien,
> >&
l or potential that the OP is looking
to correct or prevent?
Actually, the OP would be better served contacting the port maintainer
. Unlike Postfix that updates
in virtually real time, there is usually quite a lag between the time
Bash issues a patch and the time it makes it into the ports syste
;ruby", obviously with another
> program recently. I simply did an R&R of the port and now everything
> works fine. I have found over the years that certain programs just
> seem to disappear for no apparent reason and usually at the most
> in-opportunistic times.
>
>
no apparent reason and usually at the most in-opportunistic times.
By the way, does "which python" reveal anything?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:26:06 -0400
Jason E. Hale articulated:
> On Monday, July 23, 2012 10:08:18 Jerry wrote:
> > System: FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE
> >
> > I am unable to build the "sysutils/fusefs-kmod" port. This is the
> > build log:
> >
>
on Mon Jul 23 09:57:39 2012
Has anyone else experienced this problem or have a solution?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
There are people
uot;Damon Runyon"
You point is well taken though.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
__
_
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:00:20 -0500
Zhihao Yuan articulated:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone had actually attempted to compile mplayer2
> > <http://www.mplayer2.org/> on FreeBSD or if there was someone
> > working on porting
I was wondering if anyone had actually attempted to compile mplayer2
<http://www.mplayer2.org/> on FreeBSD or if there was someone working
on porting it?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To
Is there anyone working on porting "KDE Partition Manager"
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/partitionman/>, or "Parted Magic"
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/partedmagic/?source=recommended> to
FreeBSD?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list r
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 21:01:31 -0500
Matthew D. Fuller articulated:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 09:36:11AM -0400 I heard the voice of
> Jerry, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > I just did a quick perusal of the Sourceforge site
> > <https://sourceforge.net/projects/open
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:22:30 -0400
Michael Scheidell articulated:
> On 7/4/12 8:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon after updating the Perl
> > port?
> but, then again, openjade might just not be compatible with perl5.16,
> which is also a
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:22:30 -0400
Michael Scheidell articulated:
> On 7/4/12 8:05 AM, Jerry wrote:
> > Has anyone else experienced this phenomenon after updating the Perl
> > port?
> >
> yes, for years and years.
> if you update perl, from something that is working to
sr/ports/textproc/openjade.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
The "multimedia/linux-realplayer" port has been marked
"BROKEN=unfetchable" for awhile now. Has there been any movement on a
resolution for this problem.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore
r/local/kde4/lib:/usr/local/lib
-Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/local/kde4/lib:/usr/local/lib /usr/local/bin/cmake
-E
cmake_progress_report
/usr/ports/devel/kdebindings4-ruby-korundum/work/korundum-4.8.4/CMakeFiles
4 5 6 [ 67%] Built target korundum4 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error
*** E
possibility that at some future point that base could prove profitable.
Once jettisoned, it would be hard to reacquire. Basic business 101.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:12:58 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
>On 15 June 2012 18:53, Etienne Robillard wrote:
>> On 06/15/2012 01:08 PM, Jerry wrote:
>>>
>>> Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
>>> getting it ported to FreeBSD?
Skype 4.0 for Linux is now available. Is there any possibility of
getting it ported to FreeBSD? The latest version in ports is only
2.x.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header
_cn-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016)
zh_tw-freebsd-doc-20120506 > succeeds index (index has 39016)
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list foll
> Am I the only one who thinks the make process should not depend
>on tools like portmaster?
I for one would certainly hope that it didn't.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.
101 - 200 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
