Big patches

2011-08-18 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be avoided´at most costs. Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the patches on tuesday. So, what should I do? Still create full pk

Re: Big patches

2011-08-18 Thread Chris Rees
On 18 August 2011 20:11, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > avoided´at most costs. > > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the >

Re: Big patches

2011-08-18 Thread Mark Linimon
Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a glance.) Does the plist change dramaticall

Re: Big patches

2011-08-19 Thread Helmut Schneider
Mark Linimon wrote: > Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. > > GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches > viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup > process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a > glance.)

Re: Big patches

2011-08-19 Thread Chris Rees
On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. >> >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches >> viruses).  Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup >> process runs, but

Re: Big patches

2011-08-19 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi! On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > avoided´at most costs. > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I sub

Re: Big patches

2011-08-19 Thread Helmut Schneider
Chris Rees wrote: > On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Mark Linimon wrote: > > > >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately. > >> > >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches > >> viruses).  Normally I handle such PRs manually befo

Re: Big patches

2011-08-19 Thread Helmut Schneider
Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be > > avoided´at most costs. > > > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at > > least take 2 days until I

Re: Big patches

2011-08-19 Thread Chris Rees
On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote: >> >> > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be >> > avoided´at most costs. >> >> > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocke

Re: Big patches

2011-08-21 Thread Helmut Schneider
Chris Rees wrote: > On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about > >> www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION > >> at pkg-plist. One can use make variables to dramatically r