Hi,
I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
avoided´at most costs.
Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at
least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the
patches on tuesday.
So, what should I do? Still create full pk
On 18 August 2011 20:11, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
> avoided´at most costs.
>
> Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at
> least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I submitted the
>
Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches viruses).
Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup process runs, but
I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a glance.)
Does the plist change dramaticall
Mark Linimon wrote:
> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
>
> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches
> viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup
> process runs, but I forgot to do it this time. (I only took a
> glance.)
On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Mark Linimon wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
>>
>> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches
>> viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually before the cleanup
>> process runs, but
Hi!
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote:
> I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
> avoided´at most costs.
> Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at
> least take 2 days until I get reply. See PR159878-81, I sub
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 08:55, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Mark Linimon wrote:
> >
> >> Sorry, I did not see your message and emailed you separately.
> >>
> >> GNATS has a spamcatcher for > 500k messages (mostly this catches
> >> viruses). Normally I handle such PRs manually befo
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
> > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
> > avoided´at most costs.
>
> > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocked by a "SPAM Filter" or at
> > least take 2 days until I
On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:11:22 + (UTC) Helmut Schneider wrote:
>>
>> > I've been told that dynamic pkg-plists are bad or at least should be
>> > avoided´at most costs.
>>
>> > Now, all my patches for Typo3 seem blocke
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 19 August 2011 11:18, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >> You may try to reduce pkg-plist changes. Are you speaking about
> >> www/typo* ports? If yes, those ports have hardcoded PORTVERSION
> >> at pkg-plist. One can use make variables to dramatically r
10 matches
Mail list logo