On 8 October 2013, at 16:40, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I tried downloading the src with:
svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon
On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4
On 8 October 2013, at 06:22, dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
On 10/08/2013 4:27 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 5 October 2013, at 05:08, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On
Doug Hardie wrote:
The Thick Plottens…
I received the drives and installed them on a working system. The
failed system is structured with a single partition for the system and
another for swap. For some unknown reason, the BIOS got left
configured to boot the extra disk if its powered up.
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I tried downloading the src with:
svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
20130705:
hastctl(8)'s `status' command output changed to terse
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:20:40 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I tried downloading the src with:
svn co https://svn0.us-west.FreeBSD.org/base/releng/9.2 /mnt/usr/src
I didn't get Release 9.2. The first entry in UPDATING is:
20130705:
hastctl(8)'s `status' command output
On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses
a custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after
On 4 October 2013, at 09:22, dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
On 10/04/2013 1:36 am, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 11:48, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that src
is definitely part of what should be updated?
Step 2: make buildworld
Step 3: make build_kernel KERNCONF=LAFN
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in /etc/freebsd-update.conf that src
is definitely part of what should be updated?
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update from 9.1 to 9.2
Have you verified in
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
The exact sequence was:
Step 1: freebsd-update
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 21:49:18 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 20:03, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 19:42:15 -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 4 October 2013, at 19:08, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 18:58:52 -0700, Doug
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
--
Thanks,
Dean E. Weimer
03.10.2013 17:36, dweimer wrote:
When upgrading from 9.1 to 9.2 using source, is there any benefit to
rebuilding twice, due to the clang version change? So that the second
buildworld/kernel is done from the updated clang 3.3, instead of the
clang 3.1 that was in FreeBSD 9.1?
During the
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry still
says: 9.1-RELEASE. Is this correct?
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a custom
kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update completed. However, I
noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING has not been updated. The first entry
On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after the update
completed. However, I noticed that /usr/src/UPDATING
On 3 October 2013, at 11:58, dweimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
On 10/03/2013 1:48 pm, Doug Hardie wrote:
On 3 October 2013, at 10:49, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I just did an upgrade using freebsd-update to 9.2. This system uses a
custom kernel so I am rebuilding everything after
20 matches
Mail list logo
