On Tue, 29 May 2007 08:35:24 -0700 Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
> Hello All:
> We have a system that was built with the amd64 source (uname -a below).
> I was attempting to make a custom kernel and the make kept failing so I
> decided to try the make against GENERIC. It fails at the same pla
"Coen Watstaatervoor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed FreeBSD 6.1 on a new Dual AMD Opeteron HE server, during the
> installation the keyboard works fine. But when you plug in the keyboard
> after a reboot (without the keyboard attached) the keyboard won't work any
> more. I'm doing t
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:57:17 +0100
Frank Staals wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Yesterday I wanted to update my system currently running 8.0-RC1
> amd64 to the latest 8-STABLE release. However buildworld failed. I
> found out the problem seems to pop up when trying to build the lib32
> libraries. If
On 04 Apr Bachelier Vincent wrote:
> Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ?
> for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe
>CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
>
> Well, what do you think ?
> could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ?
> ok see ya
Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 04 Apr Bachelier Vincent wrote:
Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ?
for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe
CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
Well, what do you think ?
could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ?
Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:32 +0200, Bachelier Vincent
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I have a AMD64 and use FreeBSD 5.4 i386.
Why aren't you using the amd64 version of FreeBSD?
> I have set CPUTYPE=k8 to optimize a little for my computer.
> I have seen they set march=athlon-mp when it compile s
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:13:51 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related (I
> think). Is it still advisable to have "-O -pipe" in /etc/make.conf?
> I have a duron 800. Does the "-O2" flag give more errors or is it
> better than
er a écrit:
> From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> To: Bachelier Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:54:00 -0500
> Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005
Brian wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to bo
>
> 7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
> partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
> Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
>
> System is a SA6i RAID5-array with 6x300GB disks. Possibly I need to
> e
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
System is a SA6i RAID5-array with 6x300GB disks. Possibly
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
Sys
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
Hi,
What am I doing wrong?
7-Beta3 vanilla install from CD, I let sysinstall do "automatic"
partitions and slices, then stops at "F1 FreeBSD" prompt and beeps.
Obviously it cannot find anything to boot from.
System is a SA6i RAID5-array w
On 3/5/2010 6:28 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> The amd64 arch installer for 8.0-RELEASE fails to start on a ThinkPad T60
> with an Intel Centrino Core Duo. What am I doing wrong?
>
> error message:
>
> CPU doesn't support long mode
>
You have a CPU that does not have 64-bit extensions. You nee
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 06:30:48PM -0600, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> On 3/5/2010 6:28 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > The amd64 arch installer for 8.0-RELEASE fails to start on a ThinkPad T60
> > with an Intel Centrino Core Duo. What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > error message:
> >
> > CPU doesn't support
What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
The revision 3 and above system boards can run 64bit OS's.
Also if you're CPU is one of the following a a BIOS upgrade/setting
may enable the full set of processor feature
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:19:31PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
> What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
> You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
That looks like a handy tool. Is there a version that will run on
FreeBSD?
--
Chad Perrin [ original co
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:19:31PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
>> What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
>> You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
>
> That looks like a handy tool. Is there a versi
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:08:31 -0500
David T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am worried that I installed the 64 bit version of FreeBSD with an
> amd kernel on an Intel i386 box.
> Is there something wrong when I see the following:
Intel produce CPUs that are compatible with amd64. If yours wasn'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local]# uname -aFreeBSD web1.machine.net 6.2-RELEASE
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jan 6 22:37:33 CST 2008 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/web1 amd64
you did all right. you installed 64-bit kernel on 64-bit capable machine.
amd64 is just a standard for 64-bit
Em Wednesday 05 March 2008 02:36:33 Isaac Mushinsky escreveu:
> I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
> problems.
>
> My nvidia card will not be of much use (GeForce 8500GT), since
> nvidia-dri
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
> I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
> problems.
>
> My nvidia card will not be of much use (GeForce 8500GT), since nvidia
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:13:03 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
>> I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
>> installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
>> prob
On 3/5/08, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
> > I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> > installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I am going to have some
> > problems.
> >
> > My nvid
of RAM, and I seldom use more than half of that. Mind you, I'm using a
simple window manager not a desktop environment with lots of bells &
whistles.
I suspect binaries on i386 will be somewhat smaller. But amd64 has more
registers which might give some speed advantages. I haven't tested it, but
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:29:51PM +0100, alive wrote:
> > Any ATI card up to and including the 9250 (rv280) is fully supported on
> > amd64, 3D and all. (I know because I've got one :-)
> Oh, is that so? Could you please tell me how you got it to work? Because
> I've got GREAT issues getting *ANY
On 3/5/08, Isaac Mushinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/5/08, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
> > > I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
> > > installing FreeBSD/arch, but now re
Thanks.
Do you by any chance have a link to supported cards?
Do you know if this driver supports Composite? OpenGL?
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:32:06 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 06:29:51PM +0100, alive wrote:
>> > Any ATI card up to and including the 9250 (rv
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 09:22:35PM +0100, alive wrote:
> Thanks.
> Do you by any chance have a link to supported cards?
http://www.sapphiretech.com/us/products/products_overview.php?gpid=59&grp=2
Support for r300 based cards is coming as well.
> Do you know if this driver supports Composite? Ope
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, alive wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:13:03 +0100, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:36:33AM -0500, Isaac Mushinsky wrote:
I have new hardware (Abit ip35-pro, Intel Q6600), and was contemplating
installing FreeBSD/arch, but now realise that I
Thanks everyone, based on the info I am returning the nvidia card and
getting an R4xx instead (found an X850 for under $80 still sold; seems to be
well enough supported). I still want to try amd64; other limitations do not
bother me that much (I do not care for wine or win32 codecs).
__
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 19:47:53 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> of RAM, and I seldom use more than half of that. Mind you, I'm
> >> using a simple window manager not a desktop environment with lots
> >> of bells & whistles.
> >>
> >> I suspect binaries on i386 will be somew
On 06/03/2008, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Everything I've every seen about this suggests that amd64 is faster on
> a few applications, such as mp3 encoding, but generally there is very
> little difference, on average, across desktop applications. Do you have
> any measurements to support
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 07:35:34 +
"Colin Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/03/2008, RW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Everything I've every seen about this suggests that amd64 is
> > faster on a few applications, such as mp3 encoding, but generally
> > there is very little difference,
On Monday 26 July 2004 20:41, jam man wrote:
> --- Björn_Lindström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for
> >
> > the
> >
> > >> AMD64 architecture at this point?
> > >
> > > what is gentoo?
> > >
> > > is it
> One interesting point for desktop users is that Gentoo automatically compiles
> X.org as a dependency of KDE rather then XFree86. And I must say, my TFT is
> quite sharper then it was with XFree86.
Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version
can update their por
> > quite sharper then it was with XFree86.
>
> Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version
> can update their ports and have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING howto
> switch from XFree to X.org
>
i'm of of topic in X.org and XFree - what's the difference?
any URL?
tha
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:28:02PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > > quite sharper then it was with XFree86.
> >
> > Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version
> > can update their ports and have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING howto
> > switch from XFree to X.org
>
> "Gene" == Gene writes:
Gene> I'm still working out just what everything does, but the one thing I've
Gene> noticed is that it doesn't address raidz at all. Can anyone direct me to
any
Gene> docs that might help? Or does anyone know where in the wiki page's
intructions
Gene> raidz might b
On 10/12/05, Nathan Vidican <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've been encountering some difficulty between
> OpenLDAP/nss/pam/FreeBSD/samba over the past few months and really since
> inception. After countless recompiles of samba, working with samba and
> openldap code, we've traced it to being an i
Thanks, I did not realize that there was an RC1 out for 6.0 already. Any
ideas how far off 6.0-RELEASE may be? Realistically the O/S has become
the least important issue on these servers; they're basically ldap/nss
clients sharing data via samba from UFS file systems... a drop-in
replacement to
On 10/12/05, Nathan Vidican <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, I did not realize that there was an RC1 out for 6.0 already. Any
> ideas how far off 6.0-RELEASE may be? Realistically the O/S has become
> the least important issue on these servers; they're basically ldap/nss
> clients sharing data
ms80 wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
> machine.
>
> The computers specs are:
>
> cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
> board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
> ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
> hdd: 2xMaxtor STM31000528AS
> nic: 4x Intel(R) PRO/1000
[snip]
>
>
> So here
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 11:38:25 schrob Michael Powell:
> ms80 wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
> > machine.
> >
> > The computers specs are:
> >
> > cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
> > board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
> > ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
>
On 6 February 2010 22:18, ms80 wrote:
> Am Saturday 06 February 2010 11:38:25 schrob Michael Powell:
>> ms80 wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
>> > machine.
>> >
>> > The computers specs are:
>> >
>> > cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
>> > board: Gi
ms80 wrote:
[snip]
>
> Thank you for your reply.
> I'm using two of this: OCZ3P1333LVAM4GK
> (OCZ DDR3 AMD Edition, rated for 1333MHz at 1.65V). My Board is rated for
> 1066 - 1600 MHz memory, and neither the website nor the manual say
> anything about limitations with memory. Anyway: I didn't ov
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 14:03:06 schrob David N:
[snip]
>
> What power supply do you have?
> How many watts? brand?
>
> If you have insufficient power, it may cause the system to become unstable.
>
> Regards
> David N
I tested with an Enermax EPR425AWT Pro82+ II, 425W wich was the psu I b
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 14:37:16 schrob Michael Powell:
> ms80 wrote:
[snip]
>
> There seems to be a general feeling the newer AMD processors don't much
> care for higher memory voltages. Try lowering your voltages and see if it
> helps.
>
> I am successfully using this board with the CPU
Am Saturday 06 February 2010 10:17:05 schrob ms80:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem installing / upgrading FreeBSD 8.0-release on a new
> machine.
>
> The computers specs are:
>
> cpu: AMD Phenom II X4
> board: Gigabyte MA790GPT-UD3H
> ram: 4x2GBytes DDR3/1333
> hdd: 2xMaxtor STM31000528AS
> nic: 4x I
The answer, Boris, is that the "team" has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon "determined" that 10,000 ints/second
was "optimal". Of course if you're passing 1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer, Boris, is that the "team" has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon "determined" that 10,000 ints/second
was "optimal". Of c
The answer, Boris, is that the "team" has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon "determined" that 10,000 ints/second
was "optimal". Of course if you're pa
Hi Boris,
I haven't had an opportunity to work with any AMD64 hardware yet,
but have had good results with 5.4.? on i686. I can relate to your
frustration, but can say that I was able to greatly improve 5.x
performance with some effort. For example I went from a maximum
sustained disk write of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer, Boris, is that the "team" has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon "determined" that 10,000 ints/second
was "optima
Original Message-
From: Nick Pavlica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Boris Spirialitious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:05:59 -0700
Subject: Re: AMD64 much slower than i386 on FreeBSD 5.4-pre
Hi Boris,
I haven't had an opportunit
time
because of this propaganda. The cluelessness in the performance
list is a good indication.
-Original Message-
From: jason henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:57:58 -0500
Subject: Re: A
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 20:53
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: AMD64 much slower than i386 on FreeBSD 5.4-pre
>
&
Maybe you shouldn't prejudge. Its clear than no one with their
own addresses has any answers.
-Original Message-
From: Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:37:12 +0530
Subject: RE: AMD64 much slower than i386
I think the point of a list is so that someone can say "oh yes, I had
problems with the
em driver in amd64 also; try card X." But instead you get a lot of
people with no real
idea trying to explain away the problem, as if there is no chance that
the amd64
implementant just plain sucks wind. If s
--- jason henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> The answer, Boris, is that the "team" has no idea
> what
> >> they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
> >> performance testing. They tune little pieces here
>
> >> and there, and break 10 other thi
I think you may be right. I try Broadcom gigE card
with same results. Very slow for amd64 build. With
same hardware, very good results with 4.9/i386,
not too bad with 5.4-pre/i386, and very, very
poor with 5.4-pre/amd64.
Boris
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think the point of a list is so that
--- Subhro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 20:53
> > To: freebsd-questions@f
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:58:35AM +0100, Burkard Meyendriesch wrote:
> Are there any differences in making ports between i386 STABLE and amd64
> CURRENT? What is going wrong? What can I do to solve this?
Compare the build logs of the openldap port from i386 and amd64; it's
possible the build is
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:24 -0800 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:58:35AM +0100, Burkard Meyendriesch wrote:
>
> > Are there any differences in making ports between i386 STABLE and
> > amd64 CURRENT? What is going wrong? What can I do to solve this?
>
> Compare the build logs
On 11/19/11 03:54, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone else noticed a similar odd behavior with AMD64 and 9.0
prerelease (as well as RCs and betas)?
On my 12 core (2*4162EE) the whole system just freezes quite often
without any warning, without any messages being logged. Neither is
there a
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 12:54:18 +0200 (EET)
j...@iki.fi (Jukka A. Ukkonen) wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone else noticed a similar odd behavior with AMD64 and 9.0
> prerelease (as well as RCs and betas)?
Yes, I've seen a few of these myself, under both of the RCs and
PRERELEASE. No idea what the
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 04:54:18 -0600, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone else noticed a similar odd behavior with AMD64 and 9.0
prerelease (as well as RCs and betas)?
On my 12 core (2*4162EE) the whole system just freezes quite often
without any warning, without any messages being logged
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 01:10:42AM -0500, Edgar Martinez wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I have had trying to get
> this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept throwing up a privilege
> fault kernel error randomly (7sed...4m.7m..etc), and after I go
TED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:23 AM
To: Edgar Martinez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 01:10:42AM -0500, Edgar Martinez wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I c
Its using the default bios settings and nothing is overclocked at all..
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post
New error before death
"Panic: page fault"
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edga
, 2005 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
>New error before death
>
>"Panic: page fault"
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Trevor Sullivan [mai
Message-
From: Alex Zbyslaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
>OK, removed all misc cards, devices, recabled...attempt
--- Edgar Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I
> have had trying to get
> this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept
> throwing up a privilege
> fault kernel error randomly (7sed...4m.7m..etc), and
> after I go fast enoug
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; questions
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
--- Edgar Martinez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> I cant begin to tell you how horrib
Edgar Martinez wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I have had trying to get
this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept throwing up a privilege
fault kernel error randomly (7sed...4m.7m..etc), and after I go fast enough
to get lucky to an install complete..the system
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 08:20:23PM -0400, jason henson wrote:
> >MSI K8T Neo
> >
> >AMD64 3000 w/1MB
> >
> I was just reading the archives this week at freebsd.org and it leads me
> to believe msi make crap boards. They can not handle tough loads or
> lots of ram. I think it was in the amd64 l
-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
>All,
>
>
>
>I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I have had trying to get
>this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept throw
]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez
DTR stands for desktop replacement notebook. You have a cpu for a
powerful notebook, but I think it would still be a low powered desktop
cpu
So, in an effort to get my system up and running I was wondering if
someone could provide me with either a link to a v7 ISO available
somewhere, or directions on how to make a FreeBSD LiveCD (I have 2
other IA32 systems kicking around I can use for building stuff :)..).
There are 7.0-CURRENT sna
In the last episode (Mar 10), Garrett Cooper said:
> Just bought and built a new PC, comes with an Conroe-based Core 2
> Duo, Realtek 8169 Gigabit chipset, JbMicron PATA / SATA RAID
> controller, and the like. Now, I can boot up the FreeBSD livecd
> perfectly fine, but when it comes to adding
On Mar 10, 2007, at 11:11 PM, Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Mar 10), Garrett Cooper said:
Just bought and built a new PC, comes with an Conroe-based Core 2
Duo, Realtek 8169 Gigabit chipset, JbMicron PATA / SATA RAID
controller, and the like. Now, I can boot up the FreeBSD livecd
perfe
101 - 182 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
