On Jun 14, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Rob wrote:
> When 8.3 comes out, what do I need to do to update the src tree? This may be
> documented in the UPDATING docs, but having never messed with the source tree
> I haven't had cause to look. If so just tell me to go read the respective
> doc. :)
Read the
On 6/14/11 4:52 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
Also, do you know the difference between pre-built packages on the
freebsd ftp server in packages-8.2-release vs packages-8-stable?
Well, IF you installed the source tree from the SAME cd which you installed
the FreeBSD you have now, there won't be any pr
On 6/14/11 8:06 AM, Ondrej Majerech wrote:
On 06/09/2011 15:49, Rob wrote:
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
You need to rebuild your kernel with
options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries
included.
I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have
anythi
On Monday 13 June 2011 21:14:05 Rob wrote:
> On 6/9/11 4:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote:
> >> On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> >>> On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
On 06/09/2011 15:49, Rob wrote:
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
You need to rebuild your kernel with
options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries
included.
I noticed that when I tried to build the ports, but I don't have
anything in /usr/src and no information was given
On 6/9/11 4:55 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote:
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-package
On Thursday 09 June 2011 10:49:37 Rob wrote:
> On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> >> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> >> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
> >> of virtualb
On 6/6/11 8:39 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
ports/amd64
On Monday 06 June 2011 22:31:30 Rob wrote:
> On 6/6/11 8:13 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> > On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> >> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> >> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
> >> of virtualbox
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
> of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
> ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking
On 6/6/11 8:13 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
ports/amd64
On Monday 06 June 2011 17:56:53 Rob wrote:
> I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
> weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
> of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
> ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking
I was attempting to install virtualbox on my 8.2-p2 64-bit system this
weekend, and hit a rather curious situation. The pre-packaged version
of virtualbox retrievable by pkg_add is 3.2.12 (which looks in
ports/amd64/packages-8.2-release). Poking around on the ftp server, I
see that packages-8
13 matches
Mail list logo