On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:29:56AM -0700, Derek Kuli?ski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I noticed following message in the log:
>
> > KDB: stack backtrace:
> > kdb_backtrace(c07163b8,2,c661994c,0,22) at kdb_backtrace+0x2e
> > getdirtybuf(d109ebac,0,1,c661994c,1) at getdirtybuf+0x2b
> > flush_deplist(c
Martin,
TB> We're now at 2 hours uptime and there is no sign of the ATA
TB> timeouts. With the newer kernels the first timeout would appear
TB> within 5 to 10 minutes of rebooting. I can't see any changes to
TB> the ATA code in the interim so I'm curious as to what could have
TB> caused this issue
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Do you build FreeBSD with Kerberos support? There may be system
Yes, it was builded with Kerberos(0.6.3) and the heimdal port
Aha, thus you install system libraries to /usr/lib etc...
>
(0.6.3) was also installed in order to get ldap support for heimdal
...and thos
Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a
mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the
fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern
is with my root partition. I also have en ext3 partition (which I
mount as ext2), and the ker
Are you 100% sure u didn't use "shutdown -p" as I've seen this happen
and its apparently due to IDE disks lying about when they have flushed
all data to disk.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Maxi Combina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboo
Maxi Combina wrote:
> Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a
> mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the
> fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern
> is with my root partition. I also have en ext3 partition (which I
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 15:09:08 +0200, Maxi Combina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a
mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the
fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern
is with my r
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:04:56 +0200 fandino wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> >>>Do you build FreeBSD with Kerberos support? There may be system
> >
> >>Yes, it was builded with Kerberos(0.6.3) and the heimdal port
> > Aha, thus you install system libraries to /usr/lib etc...
> >
> >>(0.6.3) was
Matthias Buelow wrote:
Maxi Combina wrote:
Hello, I am running freebsd 5.4, and every time I reboot, I get a
mesasge when the kernel is mounting the filesystems. It says that the
fs were not properly unmounted, and must chek them. Them main concern
is with my root partition. I also have en e
Hello Kris,
Thursday, June 2, 2005, 12:37:41 AM, you wrote:
> It looks like debugging code (it's been removed in -current).
> Jeff:
> in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp->b_vp
> == NULL..you removed it in current in 1.166, but some people are
> seeing it trigger on 5
Gary,
I'm fighting the same battle on two new 2850's and two 1850's; "Interrupt
storm detected on "irq18:uhci2"; throttling interrupt source".
These machines have 2GB of ram and I using the i386 5.4Rel. version.
This happens
right after the reboot at the end of an install from CD. I've chosen
* Yuval Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0647 15:47]:
> >
> Is it possible to fix this issue? from the description it seems to me
> that the issue got worse since freebsd 5.3 (assuming Maxi's root
> partition is ufs2).
If it's a pain to remeber, maybe try sticking something in rc.shutdown?
--
'Ugh,
I have disabled usb via rc.conf
usbd_enable="NO"
But in the new custom kernel I have commented out all of the usb devices and
firewire.
However the machine managed to stay up for 22 hours without any problems.
But I decided to put it underload, through multiple make de/install's of
mysql, apach
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 09:11:23AM -0700, Derek Kuli?ski wrote:
> Hello Kris,
>
> Thursday, June 2, 2005, 12:37:41 AM, you wrote:
>
> > It looks like debugging code (it's been removed in -current).
>
> > Jeff:
>
> > in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp->b_vp
> > == NU
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:57 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Wednesday 01 June 2005 10:07 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> : > I see. It's because your PIR lists 10 as the only IRQ that it does
> : > this. You
We're having crash under load problems using freebsd 5.4-release
(i386) and PAE kernel.
Machine:
Dual Xeon 3.6 Dell Poweredge 2850
8 gigs of ram
16 gigs of swap
amr raid
The machine will reliably crash under load within an hour or so.
"under load" involves large network transfers being process
--- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Yuval Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0647 15:47]:
> > >
> > Is it possible to fix this issue? from the
> description it seems to me
> > that the issue got worse since freebsd 5.3
> (assuming Maxi's root
> > partition is ufs2).
>
> If it's a pain to reme
Hi Brendan,
I have 2
Dual Xeon 3.6 Dell Poweredge 2850
4 gigs of ram
8 gigs of swap
amr raid
They can crash at any moment not just underload, I persisted for 10 days to
get a stable system with and without PAE but to no avail with 4GB of RAM.
I did try and turn off ACPI, HTT which made the mac
> How are you disabling USB? It seems that has worked for you.
By adding the line below to /etc/rc.conf:
usbd_enable="NO"
and disable any usb-related in your kernel, the sections;
# USB support
...
# USB Ethernet, requires mii
...
regards
Claus
___
yuval levy wrote:
--- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Yuval Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0647 15:47]:
Is it possible to fix this issue? from the
description it seems to me
that the issue got worse since freebsd 5.3
(assuming Maxi's root
partition is ufs2
Removing the DRAC cards let me log in. Now I can deal with the
usb interrupt stuff.
db
Danny Cooper wrote:
I have disabled usb via rc.conf
usbd_enable="NO"
But in the new custom kernel I have commented out all of the usb devices and
firewire.
However the machine managed to stay up for 22
--- "J. T. Farmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yuval levy wrote:
>
> >--- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >>* Yuval Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0647 15:47]:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Is it possible to fix this issue? from the
> >>>
> >>>
> >>description it seems to me
> >>
> >>
On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:56 PM, yuval levy wrote:
If it's a pain to remeber, maybe try sticking
something in rc.shutdown?
Thank you for trying to help, but I do not find this
reply helpful. That's a quick and dirty fix, not a
solution.
[ ...car analogy snipped... ]
Quick and dirty fixes are ok fo
yuval levy wrote:
> Anyway, I am just trying to stirr some talk and get
> some attention to an issue which I find important.
> Maybe somebody with the appropriate skills will read
> this and fix the issue.
Noone complains that people stir things up every now and then.. at least
then the developer
Hello Kris,
Thursday, June 2, 2005, 11:06:54 AM, you wrote:
>> > in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp->b_vp
>> > == NULL..you removed it in current in 1.166, but some people are
>> > seeing it trigger on 5.x
>> So it's harmless?
> I don't know, but I presume the debuggi
* yuval levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0656 21:56]:
> --- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How would you feel if your car dealer would tell you
> that the car is just fine, you only have to remember,
> every time before you start it, to chew a gum and
> stick the chewing gum on that little hole
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 04:27:30PM -0700, Derek Kuli?ski wrote:
> Hello Kris,
>
> Thursday, June 2, 2005, 11:06:54 AM, you wrote:
>
> >> > in 1.141 of ffs_softdep.c you added a call to backtrace() if bp->b_vp
> >> > == NULL..you removed it in current in 1.166, but some people are
> >> > seeing it
On 2 Jun, Charles Swiger wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:56 PM, yuval levy wrote:
>>> If it's a pain to remeber, maybe try sticking
>>> something in rc.shutdown?
>>
>> Thank you for trying to help, but I do not find this
>> reply helpful. That's a quick and dirty fix, not a
>> solution.
> [ ...car a
--- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * yuval levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0656 21:56]:
> > --- Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > How would you feel if your car dealer would tell
> you
> > that the car is just fine, you only have to
> remember,
> > every time before you start it,
I've now experienced two crashes with 5.4-RELEASE-p1 as outlined below. They
appear to be the similar to:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/27608
This is a Dell 2600 dual-xeon with HT disabled, running off of the Dell(AMR)
Raid. It has a very mild load with Apache, Postgres, and
Don Lewis wrote:
> Nope, the ext2fs problem is different. It is caused by ext2fs holding
> persistent references to disk buffers that causes the kernel shutdown
> code to to think that not all the dirty buffers have been written to
> disk and skip unmounting all the file systems.
Can't that be c
On 3 Jun, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> Nope, the ext2fs problem is different. It is caused by ext2fs holding
>> persistent references to disk buffers that causes the kernel shutdown
>> code to to think that not all the dirty buffers have been written to
>> disk and skip unmount
Don Lewis wrote:
> That might help to an extent, but would not eliminate the problem. Any
> file systems between root and the mount point of the ext2 file system
> would be busy and would not be able to be unmounted. They would still
> be marked dirty and would need to be fsck'ed after the reboo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've noticed that gmirror seems to rebuild disks by copying 128K every
clock tick (or about 12.8 MB/sec on a 100HZ box) - changing HZ to 1000
resulted in my system being limited by the underlying disk controller
speed (~ 30MB/sec between FW800 drives
34 matches
Mail list logo
