On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:40:21PM -0700, Bill Swingle wrote:
> > Doh, I knew I forgot something in my original email.
> > Here's the full dmesg: http://dub.net/rum.dub.net.dmesg
>
> Actually you did include this in your original Email. I think Danie
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 07:40:21PM -0700, Bill Swingle wrote:
> Doh, I knew I forgot something in my original email.
> Here's the full dmesg: http://dub.net/rum.dub.net.dmesg
Actually you did include this in your original Email. I think Daniel
overlooked it. :-)
After looking at your dmesg an
Doh, I knew I forgot something in my original email.
Here's the full dmesg: http://dub.net/rum.dub.net.dmesg
Here's the controller info:
atapci1: port
0xec00-0xec07,0xe800-0xe803,0xe400-0xe407,0xe000-0xe003,0xdc00-0xdc0f irq 18 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata2: on atapci1
ata3: on atapci1
-Bil
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Bill Swingle wrote:
> I've read that bad SATA cables could cause this, the cables I'm using
> are brand new but are probably pretty cheap.
Unlike they're both faulty too..
You need to post your dmesg otherwise we have no idea what controller
you're using..
--
Daniel O'Conn
Hello all,
I've run across a problem that I hope someone can aid me with.
I have a fileserver that currently has a 4-disc raid connected to an IDE 3ware card. I had hoped to
replace this dying system with a pair of synchronized 1TB SATA drives. When trying to newfs them
both eventually failed
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Kris Moore wrote:
> We've released our 1.4 BETA of PC-BSD this week, and one of the
> issues which has come up is the broken support for dual-booting with
> a Vista system. Apparently the FreeBSD boot loader messes up some of
> Vista's boot process. Here's what one of our users
I'm trying to get the onboard NIC working on FreeBSD 6.2, but I'm not having
any luck. From what I've read, others have had problems with it as well. I
believe it is the Broadcom 5787.
Christopher D. Miller
CAD Concepts Inc.
1328 Dublin Rd, Suite 201
Columbus, Ohio 43215
Main: 614-485
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:18:59PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> No machine should ever poll faster than once a minute (aka "minpoll 8") to
> someone else's timeserver without prior agreement. For an example of a
> reasonable client config, MacOS X uses a minpoll of 12 and a maxpoll of 17.
An
On Jul 23, 2007, at 12:22 PM, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
I wish to second what Oliver has said, only more strongly: using
"minpoll 4" is considered abusive and a misuse of the NTP pool. From
http://www.pool.ntp.org/use.html
That was only for testing.
Please use your own timeservers for testing, no
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>> [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> server 0.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
>>> server 1.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
>>> server 2.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
>>> server ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
> It's deja-vu all over again.
>
> I found my works NTP service was broken on Friday, just after I started my
> holiday.
Interesting to hear from someone also using NAt with a very similar
problem. Thanks, I am running -STABLE rather than RELENG, but I suspect
I will simply try updating to a late
On Jul 23, 2007, at 7:10 AM, Oliver Fromme wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
server 0.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server 1.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server 2.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server ntp1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de minpoll 4 maxpoll 8
server ntp2.rz.uni
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My original intention was just to say that openntpd works just out of the
> box,
> > while ntpd doesn't.
>
> That's just plain wrong. ntpd _does_ work out of the box
> (unless your configuration is broken), and it seems to be
Has anyone done any benchmarks in desktop or server environment
comparing geom with an ICH controller through the ar device in RAID1
service? Teh google, it seems to pick up grammar school math
assignments lots of what may be relevant hits for fortunate speakers of
German :(
_
Hey guys,
We've released our 1.4 BETA of PC-BSD this week, and one of the issues
which has come up is the broken support for dual-booting with a Vista
system. Apparently the FreeBSD boot loader messes up some of Vista's
boot process. Here's what one of our users tracked it down to:
.
On Monday 23 July 2007 13:50:09 Pete French wrote:
> Just following the similarly names thread with a bit of interest and I
> decided to check my own ntp setup and, to my surprise, discovered I also
> have a machine which does nothing. What is more surprising to me is that it
> has the same config
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:39:32AM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> Do you actually need to open it up that way? I have this on my server
> which seems to work:
You don't *need* to. The method he described allows you to avoid
having to make a "restrict" entry for each matching "server", that's
a
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
My original intention was just to say that openntpd works just out of
the box, while ntpd doesn't. And since openntpd works fine for me, I
am not really interested in resolving this. Anyway since so many of
you seem to be, here is
[LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My original intention was just to say that openntpd works just out of the
> box,
> while ntpd doesn't.
That's just plain wrong. ntpd _does_ work out of the box
(unless your configuration is broken), and it seems to be
more accurate than openntpd.
De
Stefan Esser wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Momchil Ivanov wrote:
> > > I don`t know how things work, but shutting down the system when some
> > > mounted fs is no longer present seems like the wrong thing to me.
> >
> > As Josh wrote, it's expected. The problem is known
> > to exist fo
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 12:16:17 +0300
Nikolay Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 22 July 2007 16:32:19 Michael Williams wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > As you may already know, A partner and I recently purchased a
> > dedicated FreeBSD box. We're currently using Plesk (blech!) to
> > manage cl
Hello *,
don't know, if I am right here. I've already asked that on the
gnome-list some time ago, but they told me, it is a matter of the
kernel). Now I've recompiled the kernel with debugging info:
uname -a
FreeBSD worf.mydomain.home 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #35: Thu Jul
19 22:04:13 CEST 20
Just following the similarly names thread with a bit of interest and I decided
to check my own ntp setup and, to my surprise, discovered I also have a machine
which does nothing. What is more surprising to me is that it has the same
config as a number of other machines, all of which work.
We have
On Sunday 22 July 2007 16:32:19 Michael Williams wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As you may already know, A partner and I recently purchased a
> dedicated FreeBSD box. We're currently using Plesk (blech!) to
> manage client domains and such. I'm curious though as to what the
> best (most manageable) setup/c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> My original intention was just to say that openntpd works just out of the box,
> while ntpd doesn't. And since openntpd works fine for me, I am not really
> interested in resolving this. Anyway since so many of you seem to be,
My original intention was just to say that openntpd works just out of the box,
while ntpd doesn't. And since openntpd works fine for me, I am not really
interested in resolving this. Anyway since so many of you seem to be, here is
the requested data:
> ntp.conf
server 0.de.pool.ntp.org minpoll 4
26 matches
Mail list logo
