On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact
> imo.
On Linux. Have you ever seen those sorts of UI problems on FreeBSD? I don't
watch much video on my systems, but I haven't seen that. FreeBSD has a
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, November 18, 2010 4:07:27 pm Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > On 18/11/2010, at 23:59 , John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > > You used devinfo -v, so it shows the devices that exist even if they
> > > failed
> > > to attach. Try j
Not sure if this is the kind of testing you were looking for; but I've
run both mprime and boinc/setiathome for the last two days without any
problem...
It's not a notebook so I can't test suspend/resume..
On 10-11-15 4:13 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Hello,
> this is a call for testers of the me
On Nov 18, 2010, at 18:43, Julian Elischer wrote:
we are part of the way there..
at least we did abstract the scheduler to the point where we have
two completely different ones. you are welcome to develop a
'framework as you describe and plug it into the abstraction we
already have.
It
On Thu Nov 18 10, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> >On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> >>On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev
> >>wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> >>>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matth
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
>>
>> well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
>> the output window around while compiling the kernel.
>>
>
> It is trivial to bring ULE to its k
On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard t
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> > Alexander Best wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> >> > Alexa
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> Alexander Best wrote:
>
>> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
>> > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>> > >
>> > > judgi
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
> the output window around while compiling the kernel.
>
It is trivial to bring ULE to its knees. If you
have N cores then all you need is N+1 cpu int
On Thu Nov 18 10, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> Alexander Best wrote:
>
> > On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> > > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> > > >
> > > > judging from th
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 14:12:23 Bruce Cran wrote:
> According to whitelist.c in the linux suspend package, the T60 needs "s3
> bios" and "s3 mode" for the video to work on resume, which I don't think
> has been implemented.
Actually it looks like "s3 bios" is just a POST of the video card wh
Hi
Today I had problem with creating mbr partition on my pendrive.
I tried using gpart as I am most familiar with this tool. On clean device I did:
[~] # gpart create -s mbr da1
da1 created
[~] # gpart add -t mbr da1
gpart: Invalid argument
What the heck? In gpart(8) under partition types I ca
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> > >
> > > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
> >
>
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 4:07:27 pm Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> On 18/11/2010, at 23:59 , John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > You used devinfo -v, so it shows the devices that exist even if they failed
> > to attach. Try just using 'devinfo' and seeing if est1 still shows up.
>
> OK, you're
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 07:41:02PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 November 2010 06:55 pm, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 06:36:16PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > You may try "sysctl hw.acpi.handle_reboot=1". If it works, just
> > > add it in /etc/sysctl.conf.
> > >
>
On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too.
> f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock
> engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure.
I did some more tests since someone said the
On Tuesday 16 November 2010 04:20:17 Yue Wu wrote:
> I'm using FreeBSD stable on IBM T60, `acpiconf -s 3` can let T60 into
> suspend mode, but then it can't be waked up anyhow.
>
> so my question is, anyone use FreeBSD on IBM T60 and make the
> suspend/resume work on it?
According to whitelist.c
Hi John,
On 18/11/2010, at 23:59 , John Baldwin wrote:
> You used devinfo -v, so it shows the devices that exist even if they failed
> to attach. Try just using 'devinfo' and seeing if est1 still shows up.
OK, you're right: running without -v shows only est0:
nexus0
apic0
ram0
acpi0
On 11/18/10 10:55 AM, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP
On 11/18/10 19:55, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP an
On 11/18/10 19:28, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon :
> [Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
>
> Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
> pattern
> and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP and SCHED_ULE, or?
Because currently, m
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
>> Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>> >
>> > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
>>
>> Well, my
On Thu Nov 18 10, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in
> > addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is
> > nominally supposed to be the real content. That doe
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
>
> Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
> > > On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
> > >> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
> > >> This one's from Linux.
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's interactive response when under heavy load w
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in
> addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is
> nominally supposed to be the real content. That doesn't mean there is
> anything wrong with th
On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
>>> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www
On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
> > On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
> >> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
> >> This one's from Linux.
> >>
> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_vide
On 17/11/2010 21:25, Markus Gebert wrote:
On 17.11.2010, at 20:00, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/11/2010 18:38 Markus Gebert said the following:
On 17.11.2010, at 11:49, George Mamalakis wrote:
Hi everbody,
from http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS I understand that chflags are supported by
zfs. But if
on 17/11/2010 20:43 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>
> I want to do MFC of ACPICA imports to stable/8 before 8.2 release.
> This would obviously include commits that fix mismerges or remove obsolete
> code.
> Plus some other small enhancements/fixes in our ACPI code.
>
> This is what I current
on 18/11/2010 01:07 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> I think I know what's going on.
>
> Andriy, it seems this change is missing from your patchset (maybe
> more):
>
> http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/head/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/utilities/utglobal.c?r1=210976&r2=213806
Jung-uk,
thanks a lot
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010 7:46:38 pm Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 11:13 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:56:53PM -0500, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 10:40 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:22 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:22 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:22 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 12:37:33 - /
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
>> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
>> This one's from Linux.
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
>
> Well,
> it would be nice to have thos
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:42 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:42 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:42 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:56 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:13:56 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:40 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:40 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:51 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 11:24:51 - /
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
Well,
it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this
will make it in due tim
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:29 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:29 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:29 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:42 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:13:42 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:24 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:24 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:39 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 10:02:39 - /usr/bi
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:02 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:02 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:02 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:25 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-11-18 08:50:25 - /usr/
43 matches
Mail list logo
