On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too. > f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock > engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure.
I did some more tests since someone said they had problems with geli, ipsec and padlock. In the simple tests I did, I didnt find any regressions or speed differences. Info appended to http://www.tancsa.com/fpu.html I also compared to stock RELENG_8 and padlock and didnt find any issues. ---Mike _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
