On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
>>>> http://www.freebsd.org
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486
>>
>> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change current/
>> expected behavior but does allow those of us with ma
On Tue, 8 May 2007 15:33:51 +0200 (CEST), Martin Dieringer wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>
>> Martin Dieringer wrote:
>>> My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
>>> running.
>>> ntpd is running also.
>>> Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
>>
>
On Tue, 8 May 2007 14:03:58 +0200 (CEST), Martin Dieringer wrote:
>
>
> My clock is now _15 minutes_ late, after about 1 day with powerd
> running.
> ntpd is running also.
> Can nobody tell where the problem is here?
You say that ntpd is running, but what does the output of 'ntpq -p'
show?
Is
On Sep 27, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 09:56:22AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
If it up / downs the interface, it can be painful depending on your
setup. In one of the colos I dont have control over, the switch port
will block for 15 seconds for Spanning Tree
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi list
I've updated php4 this morning, and my web site using lost php
module. the php4 is unavailble on my system. /usr/ports/www/
mod_php4 has been removed, and I don't know how to get it workind,
some ideas?
The php4 module isn't
* Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060715 02:30]:
> Javier Henderson wrote:
> > * Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060714 17:15]:
>
> >> The chipset is supported, but i wouldn't recommend onboard raid for any
> >> production server. Ge
* H. Wade Minter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060714 17:01]:
> I'm considering ordering some of these servers to run FreeBSD 6.1 or
> 6-STABLE on, but they have Intel ICH7R RAID controllers on them. Googling
> around, I'm seeing conflicting information as to whether or they work, or
> work well enough
* Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060714 17:15]:
> H. Wade Minter wrote:
> >I'm considering ordering some of these servers to run FreeBSD 6.1 or
> >6-STABLE on, but they have Intel ICH7R RAID controllers on them.
> >Googling around, I'm seeing conflicting information as to whether or
> >they
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> Isn't this supposed to tell FreeBSD not to start up the sendmail daemon
> processes?
>
> It doesn't on my system, just confirmed this via a new system build. FYI.
>
> FreeBSD-6.0
Try sendmail_enable="NONE" and see what happens.
Using just "NO" will still start a sendma
Jayton Garnett wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are there any apps/utilities to check the cpu and system temperature?
>
Yes, check the healthd port.
-jav
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubs
Colin Farley wrote:
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your reply. =he model of the Cisco router is 2811. Do
you think that lowering the=imeout to 5 seconds would be ok? I have
seen that Cisco does not recommen= a timeout below 30 seconds but
after reading your reply and seeing as the=e are
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 02:26:48PM -0700, Javier Henderson wrote..
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:12:06PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote..
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If you give me $5 per Unix system found there I can retire here a
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:12:06PM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote..
Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
If you give me $5 per Unix system found there I can retire here and now.
For financial transaction processing, and the customer's accounts?
Yes. Go and visit the
> > /usr/sbin/ntpd -c /etc/ntp.conf -p /var/run/ntpd.pid \
> > - -f /var/db/ntpd.drift
>
> It's generally recommended that you never trust your own clock since
> it's completely crap as time sources go. It's also recommended that you
> use at least 5 time sources to avoid problems with bad clocks
Speaking of beasties and such, how do you propose to deal with 'daemons'?
You can't run FreeBSD without them!
-jav
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTE
16 matches
Mail list logo
