On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:47:49 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 11:50:23AM -0400, Javier Henderson wrote: >> On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 10:13:06 -0500, Dan Rue wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:47:48PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/88486 >>>> >>>> This patch was supplied 2 years ago now. It doesn't change >>>> current/ expected behavior but does allow those of us with many, >>>> many systems to not get useless e-mail. >>>> >>>> It's not even my patch! I would simply like to see this done... >>> >>> I second that notion. Isn't the *nix model to be quiet when >>> everything is OK? >> >> So if it's quiet, is it because it's OK, or because it's too broken to >> complain? > > If it's too broken to complain, then the behavior is the same with or > without this patch.
I'm just referring to the assertion that the Unix model is to be quiet when everything is OK. Maybe it's a personal preference, I guess. -jav _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"