-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:21:07 -0800, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please DON'T top post to any FreeBSD list!
Who was top-posting? I certainly wasn't! I hate that moronic practice with
a vengeance.
Only mildly less annoying is people w
<-Original Message->
From: Kevin Oberman
Sent: 3/2/2005 10:45:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Xorg 6.8.1 and SCHED_ULE vs. SCHED_4BSD
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:11 +0100
> From: Godwin Stewart
> Sender: [
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:36:11 +0100
> From: Godwin Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is the process that does the FFT in kern
> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:24:58 +0100
> From: Godwin Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:39 -0800, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd say something is very wrong on your systems and I'd ALMOST bet it's
> > ata related. Maybe ATA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:32:02 -0500 (EST), Jeff Roberson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the process that does the FFT in kernel, niced, or rtprio'd?
last pid: 93131; load averages: 0.96, 0.49, 0.24 up 0+05:18:20 15:29:47
48 processes: 2 running,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:21:39 -0800, "Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd say something is very wrong on your systems and I'd ALMOST bet it's
> ata related. Maybe ATA-MkIII would help things out.
Possibly, altho' I doubt it given that the
Hi,
i have relatively early updated my XFree to Xorg. In Version 6.7.x
it has an problematic driver for Intel's Ich2 I815 Graphik-Card.
The Developers say's this should be fixed in 6.8.1, may i have seen that
it's not really. The failures are a little bit less then fromer with
6.7.x but it's
the
eb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
> > > switching for me.
> >
> > Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 anyw
> > I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
> > switching for me.
>
> Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg 6.8.1 anyway. It
> didn't break vt-switching for me, thankfully. Other than the core keyboard
> driver
On Monday, 28. February 2005 03:25, Gary Kline wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:36:43AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > How about adjusting the configuration then?
> > >
> > > There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
> > > set
Godwin Stewart napisaÅ(a):
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
switching for me.
One of the things I've been doing is to record some of my old cassettes
(you know, t
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:55, Gary Kline wrote:
> > FYI X.Org should have just used your XF86-4 config file by default.
>
> XF86Config bombed instantly, even with startx.
> This afternoon after hours of testing one-change-at-a-time
> I found that the DefaultDepth of 8 is at least one
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:36:43AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > How about adjusting the configuration then?
> >
> > There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
> > set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
> > displa
on you.
I have yet to see a simple "portupgrade " try to upgrade
anything other than .
> Now, if I could be certain that Xorg has settled down, I wouldn't
> mind upgrading from 6.7.0 to 6.8.1 and have done with it.
I've been using Xorg 6.8.1 since a week after it hit the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-
> switching for me.
Well, I decided to bite the bullet and upgraded to Xorg
On Sunday, 27. February 2005 02:06, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > How about adjusting the configuration then?
> >
> > There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
> > set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
> > display `qui
ther way round. Every time I want to
>> > > > portupgrade something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg.
>> > >
>> > > edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and
>> > > change it to
>> > >
>> >
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12, Gary Kline wrote:
> > How about adjusting the configuration then?
>
> There is utterly no xorg.conf file; the xorg probes
> set the resolution to the max (1600x1200), and the
> display `quivers' --for lack of a better word. So far
> my attemps wit
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:49 pm, you wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:38:22PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > Try setting in /etc/make.conf
> >
> > X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xfree86-4
> >
> > There is an entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING about it.
> >
> > Upgrading with sysutils/portmanager should be
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:38:22PM -0800, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>
> Try setting in /etc/make.conf
>
> X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xfree86-4
>
> There is an entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING about it.
>
> Upgrading with sysutils/portmanager should be able to reset all of your
> dependencies after that.
>
g else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg.
> > >
> > > edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change
> > > it to
> > >
> > > HOLD_PKGS = [
> > > 'bsdpan-*',
> > > 'xorg-*',
> > > &#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:49:00 +0100, Michael Nottebrock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change
> it to
>
> HOLD_PKGS = [
> 'bsdpan-*',
> 'xorg-*',
> 'imake-*',
> ]
That's
he HOLD_PKGS = [ line and
> > change it to
> >
> > HOLD_PKGS = [
> > 'bsdpan-*',
> > 'xorg-*',
> > 'imake-*',
> > ]
> >
> > I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks
>
t; > it to
> >
> > HOLD_PKGS = [
> > 'bsdpan-*',
> > 'xorg-*',
> > 'imake-*',
> > ]
> >
> > I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks
> > vt-switching for me.
>
&
me I want to portupgrade
> > something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg.
>
> edit /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change it
> to
>
> HOLD_PKGS = [
> 'bsdpan-*',
> 'xorg-*',
> 'imake-*
tools.conf, find the HOLD_PKGS = [ line and change it
to
HOLD_PKGS = [
'bsdpan-*',
'xorg-*',
'imake-*',
]
I've been using that for a long time now, since Xorg 6.8.1 breaks vt-switching
for me.
--
,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [E
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:35, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> No, the problem's the other way round. Every time I want to portupgrade
> something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg. I don't want the
> latest Xorg after the horror stories I heard.
>
> That's why I'm building firefox-1.0.1 independent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 10:25:24PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:36, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> > ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
> > reporting random freezes and crashes with the new vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't need to update a port just because it depends on Xorg. The X
> API is quite stable so you can update just Xorg without expecting any
> problems. (I did XFree8
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:36, Godwin Stewart wrote:
> ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
> reporting random freezes and crashes with the new version of Xorg. This
> seems to have died down now so I might consider the update, which might not
> be a bad idea given
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What is the current status of Xorg 6.8.1?
ISTR not that long ago - when ports were updated from 6.7.0 - people were
reporting random freezes and crashes with the new version of Xorg. This
seems to have died down now so I might consider the update
jag wrote:
Hello,
Is there anyone running this combination successfully.
It has given me different errors a different times and
presently it gives (EE) R128: DFP no detected.
The same card works ok in FreeBSD 5.2.1
I don't have any problem with the following config :
- FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE (Dec. 30th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:08:12 -0800 (PST), jag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there anyone running this combination successfully.
> It has given me different errors a different times and
> presently it gives (EE) R128: DFP no detected.
It always does.
Hello,
Is there anyone running this combination successfully.
It has given me different errors a different times and
presently it gives (EE) R128: DFP no detected.
The same card works ok in FreeBSD 5.2.1
Thanks for your help
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired
34 matches
Mail list logo
