Andy Kosela wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
I think we still have FreeBSD-3.x machines in production. I know we
have FreeBSD-4.3. 99.9% of security issues don't affect us. We have
our own package system built on top of FreeBSD's pkg_add format and
have the ability to
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:26:05PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
It would be easy to maintain 4.x compatibility in Yahoo's package
system. They probably only need a relatively small number of ports, and
there is no need to stay in sync with changes to the ports
infrastructure. Those
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
No. Why on earth would we do that? if we wanted to cause ourselves
that much pain for no good reason, we'd go get a pencil and stab
ourselves in the eye.
We don't upgrade machines that have been deployed unless there is a
good reason to.
This
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
I think we still have FreeBSD-3.x machines in production. I know we
have FreeBSD-4.3. 99.9% of security issues don't affect us. We have
our own package system built on top of FreeBSD's pkg_add format and
have the ability to push packages to
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
Correct. We roll our own build snapshots periodically, but we also
keep a pretty careful eye on what's going on in the -stable branches.
Okay, that makes sense to me ;-)
I
On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
FWIW, Yahoo! tracks -stable branches, not point releases.
I'm curious about this (and stealing the dead thread).
How does one track -stable in an enterprise environment? I assume
that what you mean is we pick points in -stable that we
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 2:23 AM, Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
FWIW, Yahoo! tracks -stable branches, not point releases.
I'm curious about this (and stealing the dead thread).
How does one track -stable in an enterprise environment? I
FWIW, Yahoo! tracks -stable branches, not point releases.
I'm curious about this (and stealing the dead thread).
How does one track -stable in an enterprise environment? I assume that what
you mean is we pick points in -stable that we believe are stable enough and
create a snapshot from
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:07 AM, Claus Guttesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, Yahoo! tracks -stable branches, not point releases.
I'm curious about this (and stealing the dead thread).
How does one track -stable in an enterprise environment? I assume that what
you mean is we pick points in
On Jun 25, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Peter Wemm wrote:
Correct. We roll our own build snapshots periodically, but we also
keep a pretty careful eye on what's going on in the -stable branches.
Okay, that makes sense to me ;-)
I mean, I guess Yahoo has enough resources to literally run every
commit
10 matches
Mail list logo
