Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Build Tools

2016-01-12 Thread Antony Gordon
Hi, There are a lot of libraries that are used to BUILD FreeDOS from source. If those libraries were all together, it would make the build process easier. I also think that it would encourage some code re-use because the library to do (x) function is readily available to be included instead of

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Build Tools

2016-01-11 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Antony Gordon wrote: > > If a package called FreeDOS Build Tools/Headers or whatever was built, what > are > the common 3rd party libraries, such as internationalization, for example > that we > could include to make building

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Build Tools

2016-01-11 Thread Tom Ehlert
Hi, > Just thought I'd bring this back up as I am currently working on > one of the core components to transition it from Borland to OpenWatcom. > In looking at the code, I noticed that for internationalization, > the CATS library is used. right. so far there's no central, shared source for

Re: [Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Build Tools

2016-01-11 Thread Ralf Quint
On 1/11/2016 12:48 PM, Tom Ehlert wrote: >> So in getting back to this developer studio, it appears obvious the >> previous chain that there was no real agreement on an editor. > editor ??? > EDLIN is the official DOS editor ;) > Tom, just made my day! Ralf ;-) --- This email has been checked

[Freedos-devel] FreeDOS Build Tools

2016-01-11 Thread Antony Gordon
Hi, Just thought I'd bring this back up as I am currently working on one of the core components to transition it from Borland to OpenWatcom. In looking at the code, I noticed that for internationalization, the CATS library is used. One version of the FDISK source code didn't have the source or