On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 16:56, Alain M. wrote:
>> UNARJ.EXE may be freely used and distributed.
>
> Doesn't matter anyway - I just checked my repository, and there is only the
> OpenSource version of ARJ, so no license problem there :)
>
Co
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> Hi people!
>
> So far, we have always used packaging sources and binaries differently (that
> is, in separate packages, like memx.zip and mems.zip). I am trying to put
> some effort these days into syncing some packages to make them ready fo
Just thought I'd let people know:
I will be a Nifty Guest for Penguicon 7.0, a science fiction and open
source software convention. This year’s Penguicon will be May 1-3, in
Romulus, Michigan. I’m presenting at two sessions: “Linux in the
Enterprise” and “Starting your own Free/open source softwar
Thank you again.
Now, I will translate all files from fdlang repostitory and then I can
do something more advanced :-)
Best regards,
Mateusz Viste napsal(a):
> Okay, found it :)
>
>
> For translating the FreeCOM shell, you will need to download the file below:
> http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro
Okay, found it :)
For translating the FreeCOM shell, you will need to download the file below:
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/dos/command/0.83beta/083Beta04/localize.zip
In that archive, you will find a nice how-to about translating the command
shell and "compiling" the
Hi Petr!
On Saturday 04 April 2009 20:53, Petr Ullmann wrote:
> I would like to start with translation of FreeDOS to czech language.
> Where can I find some informations about way of FreeDOS translations or
> informations about translation project?
In fact, there isn't much you have to know, tr
But then it wouldn't be compatible with the LFN that came with
Windows9X and is used in the millions of USB devices or the like, nor
with the applications that are LFN-aware (unless you'd like to rewrite
the DOS LFN API descript.ion-based...
Aitor
2009/4/2 Eric Auer :
>
> Hi!
>
>>> So why cant
Hello,
I would like to start with translation of FreeDOS to czech language.
Where can I find some informations about way of FreeDOS translations or
informations about translation project?
Thank you very much for you help :-)
Petr Ullmann
Mateusz Viste napsal(a):
> Hi all!
>
> It has been a lon
I was wrong about wget not crashing, it just took it a long time to
crash running it on it's own. Is the kernel going to be reworked
anytime soon to remove this fnode concept?
--
_
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Mateusz Viste wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> It has been a long time that the "poor translation management" was bothering
> me. There is no easy way to know what needs to be translated, and what is
> already translated but not shipped with the package for whatever reason.
>
On Saturday 04 April 2009 17:22, usul wrote:
> If putting them into a single zip forces that the sources are
> installed everytime.
> I would disagree. Its an extra step for the end user to manually delete them.
No, no extra step required. See below.
> if there was a way to automate the removal o
Hi
If putting them into a single zip forces that the sources are
installed everytime.
I would disagree. Its an extra step for the end user to manually delete them.
what if this is being used in an embedded environment where space is premium.
Not all users of dos are technical like us, the more st
Hi,
i totally agree with Mateusz and Michael
also, once there is a source directory
i think we can modify softwares to select
'binary only, source only or both'
See YA!
Geraldo
Sapere Aude
Non ducor, duco
São Paulo, Brasil, -3gmt
site: http://exdev.sf.net/
msn: geraldo_boca_at_hotmail.com
skype
It looks like you want it more reliable... Sounds very reasonable.
Actually more pros (more easy for you, faster) then cons (file size).
As you have the most work with it,
do it.
-mr
Mateusz Viste schrieb:
> Hi people!
>
> So far, we have always used packaging sources and binaries differently
Hi people!
So far, we have always used packaging sources and binaries differently (that
is, in separate packages, like memx.zip and mems.zip). I am trying to put some
effort these days into syncing some packages to make them ready for v1.1, and I
have to tell that handling sources and binaries
15 matches
Mail list logo
