Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread Michael Robinson
Dos makes sense for 8/16 bit computers that can't handle multitasking very well. There are plenty of 8/16 bit computers around still, think e-readers probably and other embedded devices that don't need the higher functionality a 32/64 bit machine/multi core machine offers. Dos was a quick and d

Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread Jim Lemon
On 01/03/2013 12:57 PM, dmccunney wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Jim Lemon wrote: > >> If there was a Linux kernel in which the user could turn off everything that >> isn't in DOS, that would be a way out. > > If you could turn off everything that *isn't* in DOS, you might have > fun run

Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Littlejohn
Actually I use DOS because I use an antique office package "Open Access IV". It works for me, does it's job very nicely and has survived nearly 25 years without a virus etc. I can write a program using the word processor, database and language calls in a quarter of the time it would take on other p

Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Michael Robinson wrote: > > Dos makes sense for 8/16 bit computers that can't handle multitasking > very well. [MS-based] "DOS" is exclusively 16-bit, it won't work on 8-bit at all (at least not in "traditional" sense or any reasonable variant that I know of).

Re: [Freedos-user] old machines

2013-01-03 Thread Andrew Robins
P.S. Starting from here of course http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeDOS#Memory_management -- Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skil

Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread dmccunney
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Jim Lemon wrote: > On 01/03/2013 12:57 PM, dmccunney wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Jim Lemon wrote: >> >>> If there was a Linux kernel in which the user could turn off everything that >>> isn't in DOS, that would be a way out. >> >> If you could turn of

[Freedos-user] CD-DVD ROM drıve

2013-01-03 Thread TuLithu
Last night I installed FreeDOS on my HP Pavilion g series laptop. Everything seems to work fine, except I can't access my DVD ROM drive. I have spent several hours reading the help files and examining the config.sys and autoexec.bat files, but I can't figure out what the problem is. I figured t

Re: [Freedos-user] CD-DVD ROM drıve

2013-01-03 Thread Chris Evans
You need a cd/DVD rom driver that supports your drive Installed in config.sys If you want I can send you some drivers for highspeed driver Let me know.. -Chris Http://digitalatoll.com On Thursday, January 3, 2013, TuLithu wrote: > > Last night I installed FreeDOS on my HP Pavilion g series lap

Re: [Freedos-user] CD-DVD ROM drıve

2013-01-03 Thread Ralf A. Quint
At 02:14 PM 1/3/2013, TuLithu wrote: >Last night I installed FreeDOS on my HP Pavilion g series laptop. Everything >seems to work fine, except I can't access my DVD ROM drive. I have spent >several hours reading the help files and examining the config.sys and >autoexec.bat files, but I can't fig

Re: [Freedos-user] CD-DVD ROM drıve

2013-01-03 Thread Gulsun Eby
Thank you for the responses. Unfortunately, since I have no way to load a driver because of the DVD ROM not working, I guess I am back at square one. That's OK. I guess I could run FreeDOS ın virtualBOX on LINUX. On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Ralf A. Quint wrote: > At 02:14 PM 1/3/2013, Tu

Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread Mark Littlejohn
There should also be made a distinction between real time input and real time output and servo loop. If you are capturing timing events you really only need to respond to an event and store a time for later processing. I usually use a microcontroller and write a routine around its interrupts so tha

[Freedos-user] New Version of DOSUTILS

2013-01-03 Thread wiwa64
I just want to inform the few braves who still use (or even work with) any flavor of DOS, that i just released a new version of my DOSUTILS package. I added a new utility to the package and two others were improved. The new utility INLINE allows to place multi-line data, that is to be fed as in

Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread john s wolter
It's the clock, just the clock. It's a square wave usually, the old up and down. Pin 19, CLK, on the Intel 8086 DIP When emulating the speed of a 8088, 8086, 80286,... CPUs you need to emulate the Clock cycles -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_...etc... So sticking in NOPs may not work.

Re: [Freedos-user] New Version of DOSUTILS

2013-01-03 Thread dmccunney
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 7:08 PM, wiwa64 wrote: > The new utility INLINE allows to place multi-line data, that is to be > fed as input into another program via stdin, directly within the > batchfile from which the program is invoked. Users who are familiar with > shell programming under UNIX, might

Re: [Freedos-user] Long-term survival of FreeDOS

2013-01-03 Thread Jim Lemon
On 01/04/2013 04:13 AM, dmccunney wrote: > ... > "Real time" simply means "guaranteed to respond to an external event > within a specified period". What time period is required? > I have been able to guarantee millisecond resolution of events to measure the subtle effects on human performance of