Thanks Jordi, thanks Krish,
The problem goes on.
I have checked my libtiff files ($ sudo apt-cache search libtiff) and have
got exactly the same as you, Jordi. The problem is that libtiff.so.3 is not
between them.
I also managed to do the symbolic link with sudo ln -sf usr/lib/libtiff.so.4
/usr/
The files have been dropped.
https://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/showgroup/24787/1/d2a16267b417faa9da6f7cff3c36228a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 13:21, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> if you file drop these volumes we'll take a look
> Bruce
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, G. William Chapman IV wrote:
just took a look. Why is your PD.nii.gz two frames? The problem is
reslicing a 2-frame volume but specifying a volume as a template that
only has 1 frame. We shouldn't be core dumping, but that's the unusual
situation that is causing it.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, G. William Chapman IV
p.s. also, why are you specifying --like and -rl?
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, G.
William Chapman IV wrote:
The files have been
dropped.https://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/showgroup/24787/1/d2a16267b417faa9da6f7cff3c36228a
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 13:21, Bruce Fischl wrote:
if
I'm not sure why the PD would be two frames -- the files were downloaded as
dcm from the ADNI database. After looking through them though, there was a
repeat of the slices, so I removed the second frame. Seems to have solved
the problem, as the reslice is working now.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 0
glad to hear it
Bruce
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, G. William Chapman IV wrote:
I'm not sure why the PD would be two frames -- the files were downloaded as
dcm from the ADNI database. After looking through them though, there was a
repeat of the slices, so I removed the second frame. Seems to have solved
You also might want to look at the command asegstats2table to generate a table
of all results.
Best Martin
On Jun 22, 2011, at 10:08 PM, ZhiLiangLong wrote:
> Hi all:
>After all "recon-all -all" processing has been completed for all subjects
> ,I want to obtain volume of specific structu
Dear FreeSurfers,
I am looking for a little help comparing longitudinal data. I have three
timepoints on each patient and have been able to get individual
spc-thickness maps using the long_mris_slopes command where my table
included all three time points. I would however like to compare different
Hi Sean,
I think the --out... names need to be without the ending (mgh)
so for example --out-avg=long23.thickness-avg
Maybe that'll fix it.
Best, Martin
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:12 -0700, Seán Froudist Walsh wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfers,
>
> I am looking for a little help comparing longitudinal
Hi Leo,
you will need a T1-weighted image that is about 1mm isotropic
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 23 Jun
2011, leonardo kay wrote:
Hi all
Do anyone have experience doing parcellations using AXIAL T2 FLAIR
acquisitions? What sequence do you recomend most
for parcellation/labelling under freesur
Hi all
Do anyone have experience doing parcellations using AXIAL T2 FLAIR
acquisitions? What sequence do you recomend most
for parcellation/labelling under freesurfer?
Best regards,
--
Leo Kay.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.ed
Dear freesurfer experts,
I have a simple question about the use of isxconcat-sess.
I plan to conduct a between-groups analysis later (using mri_glmfit), but as
I am creating my osgm using isxconcat-sess, is it is necessary for the text
file list of subjects (indicated by -sf) to match the orde
Hi everyone!
I'm currently a summer student working at a lab which uses Freesurfer to
measure hippocampal volumes. I noticed that scanning the same patient first
on a GE 3T (Multi-channel head coil) and then a GE 1.5T (single-channel head
coil) 24 hours later resulted in a 30% increase in the lef
This is not normal. Maybe you should check the aseg volume for improper
segmentation.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 19:27, Jessica Liu wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm currently a summer student working at a lab which uses Freesurfer to
> measure hippocampal volumes. I noticed that scanning the same pa
Hi Jessica,
what were the coils? Certainly you will find substantial differences
comparing across both field strength and receive coil. Did the
segmentations look reasonable? Was it the same sequence?
Bruce
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Jessica Liu wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm currently a summer stude
Hi Jessica,
the 1.5t scan looks kind of washed out and low contrast, but of course
it's hard to tell from an image. The 3T looks much crisper. Were the
sequence parameters matched? I'm not sure what you're trying to show with
this. The 3T multi-channel scan will have a much, much higher SNR th
Hi John, they should line up. Technically, if you're just doing an OSGM
(one-sample group mean), then the order is not important. But it you
want to compare across groups, you need to make sure that the group
memberships are properly assigned.
doug
On 6/23/11 5:05 PM, John Richey wrote:
> Dear
17 matches
Mail list logo
