James Eaton-Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 12:49 +0100, James Eaton-Lee wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:22 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
>>
>>> (volume of accounts in thousands). However that's from 7 years
>>> ago :(
>>>
>>> There may be more recent figures but a quick google can't
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 12:49 +0100, James Eaton-Lee wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:22 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > (volume of accounts in thousands). However that's from 7 years
> > ago :(
> >
> > There may be more recent figures but a quick google can't find 'em.
>
> Wikipedia has some g
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 10:22 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> (volume of accounts in thousands). However that's from 7 years
> ago :(
>
> There may be more recent figures but a quick google can't find 'em.
Wikipedia has some good ones on the 'Bank' page:
--
James (njan) Eaton-Lee | 10807960 |
hi Lance --
interesting data!
It might be worth scaling that against each bank's credit-card issuance
volumes, to compensate for their relative sizes. This report --
http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/publicpolicystudies/emergingpayments/pdf/eps-2001-2.pdf
-- gives these account volumes fo
Lance James wrote:
> One thing to add:
>
correction 21,000 cards per 3 months.
> This is one group, with 21,000 cards per month (that we know about) and
> law enforcement estimates about $500.00 per card in average loss. At
> that rate, in 3 months, one carding group causes $10,500,000.00 in los
One thing to add:
This is one group, with 21,000 cards per month (that we know about) and
law enforcement estimates about $500.00 per card in average loss. At
that rate, in 3 months, one carding group causes $10,500,000.00 in loss.
And this carding group is at the low end of the totem poll.
Lanc
