Summer of Code 2006

2006-04-16 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Google is hosting Summer of Code again this year. This is a program in which they sponsor students to work on open source projects. The students work under the guidance of mentors on specific approved projects. For each completed project, Google will pay the student $4500 and the project $500.

Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-04-16)

2006-04-16 Thread H. J. Lu
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 02:04:10PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > I've now reviewed the open regressions against the GCC 4.1 branch. > There are 101 "serious" (P3 or higher) regressions against GCC 4.1, the > vast majority of which also apply to 4.2. Therefore, fixing these > regressions provides a

re: Toolchain relocation

2006-04-16 Thread Dan Kegel
Hi Dave. I hope you find and squash the relocation bug the right way, but until then, perhaps you could use my cheezy program that fixes embedded paths in gcc toolchains. It's at http://kegel.com/crosstool/current/fix-embedded-paths.c I haven't tested it on mingw toolchains, so some assembly may b

RFA: #line directives in generated files to aid debugging

2006-04-16 Thread Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
The generator programs (e.g. build/genattrtab) output #line directives before code which has been copied from the machine description files, so the debugger will show you the correct file. But this then causes trouble when single stepping through code which wasn't included from the .md files. Gen_f

GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-04-16)

2006-04-16 Thread Mark Mitchell
I've now reviewed the open regressions against the GCC 4.1 branch. There are 101 "serious" (P3 or higher) regressions against GCC 4.1, the vast majority of which also apply to 4.2. Therefore, fixing these regressions provides a double benefit: both the release branch and the next release will be i

i386.md: operand 1 missing mode? (x86_movsicc_0_m1,gcc346,gcc41,gcc42)

2006-04-16 Thread J.C.
Hello GCC's people, What can you say me about this common WARNING in GCC-3.4.6, GCC-4.1-20060414 and GCC-4.2-20060415? -- GCC-3.4.6: -- ./genrecog ./config/i386/i386.md > tmp-recog.c ./co

Re: Toolchain relocation

2006-04-16 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 09:46:24AM +0100, Dave Murphy wrote: > I had a look through gcc.c and noticed that standard_exec_prefix and > standard_libexec_prefix are constants which refer to the configured > install path. gcc_exec_prefix and gcc_libexec_prefix are the equivalent > paths adjusted for

A question about the VEC API

2006-04-16 Thread Kazu Hirata
Hi Nathan, Does the VEC API support the following? typedef unsigned char vec_uchar; DEF_VEC_I(vec_uchar); DEF_VEC_ALLOC_I(vec_uchar,gc); Note that this is GC'ed. When I use this construct in except.c, I get libbackend.a(except.o): In function `gt_ggc_mx_eh_status': ./gt-except.h:104: undefined