Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-22 Thread Joern Rennecke
On 21 May 2014 14:13, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi wrote: >>>Building libgcc is not optional. It is required for all targets. > > So, irrespective whether i provide floating point implementation by > soft-fp, fpu-bit or ieeelib, an error free libgcc build is a MUST? > > What if I dont want to generate c

Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-21 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi wrote: >>>Building libgcc is not optional. It is required for all targets. > > So, irrespective whether i provide floating point implementation by > soft-fp, fpu-bit or ieeelib, an error free libgcc build is a MUST? Yes. > What if I dont wa

Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-21 Thread Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
>>Building libgcc is not optional. It is required for all targets. So, irrespective whether i provide floating point implementation by soft-fp, fpu-bit or ieeelib, an error free libgcc build is a MUST? What if I dont want to generate calls to libgcc.a but want want gcc to generate inline code?

Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-21 Thread Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi > wrote: >> Hi again! >> You need to look in target-arch/libgcc/config.log to see what the problem is. >> config.log states the following error: >> configure:2590: checking

Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-20 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi wrote: >>>If you have a working compiler that is missing some functions >>>provided by libgcc, that should be sufficient to build libgcc. > Meaning that even if i am unable build libgcc to my new architecture, > I should be able to able to pro

Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-20 Thread Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
>>If you have a working compiler that is missing some functions >>provided by libgcc, that should be sufficient to build libgcc. Meaning that even if i am unable build libgcc to my new architecture, I should be able to able to provide soft-fp support to the architecture? Btw i get the following er

Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-16 Thread Paul_Koning
On May 16, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Ian Bolton wrote: >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi >> wrote: >>> >>> I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core >>> processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that >>> libgcc has not been cross-compile

RE: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-16 Thread Ian Bolton
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi > wrote: > > > > I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core > > processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that > > libgcc has not been cross-compiled for my target architecture and > some > > functions

Re: soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-16 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi wrote: > > I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core > processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that > libgcc has not been cross-compiled for my target architecture and some > functions are missing so i

soft-fp functions support without using libgcc

2014-05-16 Thread Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
Hi all, I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that libgcc has not been cross-compiled for my target architecture and some functions are missing so i cannot build libgcc.I believe soft-fp is compiled in libgcc so i