On 21 May 2014 14:13, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
wrote:
>>>Building libgcc is not optional. It is required for all targets.
>
> So, irrespective whether i provide floating point implementation by
> soft-fp, fpu-bit or ieeelib, an error free libgcc build is a MUST?
>
> What if I dont want to generate c
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
wrote:
>>>Building libgcc is not optional. It is required for all targets.
>
> So, irrespective whether i provide floating point implementation by
> soft-fp, fpu-bit or ieeelib, an error free libgcc build is a MUST?
Yes.
> What if I dont wa
>>Building libgcc is not optional. It is required for all targets.
So, irrespective whether i provide floating point implementation by
soft-fp, fpu-bit or ieeelib, an error free libgcc build is a MUST?
What if I dont want to generate calls to libgcc.a but want want gcc to
generate inline code?
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:47 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
> wrote:
>> Hi again!
>>
You need to look in target-arch/libgcc/config.log to see what the
problem is.
>> config.log states the following error:
>> configure:2590: checking
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
wrote:
>>>If you have a working compiler that is missing some functions
>>>provided by libgcc, that should be sufficient to build libgcc.
> Meaning that even if i am unable build libgcc to my new architecture,
> I should be able to able to pro
>>If you have a working compiler that is missing some functions
>>provided by libgcc, that should be sufficient to build libgcc.
Meaning that even if i am unable build libgcc to my new architecture,
I should be able to able to provide soft-fp support to the
architecture?
Btw i get the following er
On May 16, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Ian Bolton wrote:
>> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core
>>> processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that
>>> libgcc has not been cross-compile
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
> wrote:
> >
> > I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core
> > processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that
> > libgcc has not been cross-compiled for my target architecture and
> some
> > functions
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:34 AM, Sheheryar Zahoor Qazi
wrote:
>
> I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core
> processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that
> libgcc has not been cross-compiled for my target architecture and some
> functions are missing so i
Hi all,
I am trying to provide soft-fp support to a an 18-bit soft-core
processor architecture at my university. But the problem is that
libgcc has not been cross-compiled for my target architecture and some
functions are missing so i cannot build libgcc.I believe soft-fp is
compiled in libgcc so i
10 matches
Mail list logo