--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 05:55 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE:
-ftree-vectorize, segfault
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 14:21 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|libgcj |AWT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21747
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25
02:35 ---
This is not a bug in the FSF released GCC, only Apple's report it to them.
--
What|Removed |Added
The native code in the lwjgl distribution refers to an int "depth" field in
JAWT_X11DrawingSurfaceInfo. We don't have that in our version.
This code won't build without it.
--
Summary: JAWT_X11DrawingSurfaceInfo missing depth field
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Consider the code:
class A {
public:
virtual void foo() = 0;
};
class B : public A {
public:
virtual void foo() {}
};
int main()
{
const A &a = B(); // <-- here
return 0;
}
in g++-4.0, as it comes pre-installed on Mac 10.4, I get the error:
$ g++ -c g++4-bug.cc
g
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 02:03
---
Do you still see this on HEAD? I can't reproduce it. What applet are you
running?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21649
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 02:01
---
Are you using focus-follows-mouse? If so, this is a known problem; a change in
a window's active state causes an expose event on the entire window, which
triggers a repaint. We need to find a way to prevent tha
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 01:59
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |target
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||aarestad at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21745
While building a cross-compiler on my Linux x86 box, I got this error in the
middle of the libstdc++ build:
Command:
/usr/local/src/build-gcc/gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/usr/local/src/build-gcc/gcc/
-nostdinc++ -L/usr/local/src/build-gcc/h8300-hms/h8300s/normal/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/usr/local/src/bui
--- Additional Comments From kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25 01:11
---
> /home/hp/cvs_areas/combined/combined/libstdc++-v3/configure: line 1545:
GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES: command not found
This was due to my changes.
This error was simply due to a mismatch in aclocal versions back wh
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-05-25 00:33 ---
Just a note that this still fails to issue an error on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirm
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25
00:23 ---
*** Bug 21744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25
00:23 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19960 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Trying to build m6812 cross compiler causes an internal compiler error.
Configured with ../../
gcc-4.0.0/configure --prefix=/usr/cross/m6812 --target=m6812 (using the
gcc-core-4.0.0, using
only the c compiler). Re-running the command that failed with a -v causes the
following error..
/usr/cr
--- Additional Comments From stevenj at alum dot mit dot edu 2005-05-24
23:51 ---
I doubt that merely omitting close() from the end of the library will entirely
fix the problem. You really need to add an fflush before every output to stdio.
For example, modify ciotst.f to:
progr
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
23:42 ---
Subject: Bug 19833
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-24 23:41:53
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: uninit-4.c uninit-9.c
g
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-05-24 23:06
---
Subject: Re: bogus uninitialized variable warning for powerpc64
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 11:02:09PM -, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Diego, can this PR be closed as fixed?
>
Yes. Apologies for no
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24 23:02
---
Diego, can this PR be closed as fixed?
Test gcc.dg/uninit-4.c started to XPASS with this patch from dnovillo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg00529.html
On the same day, test uninit-9.c also st
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-24 22:46
---
Ah, ah, cool, thanks! I'm going to propose that!
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassign
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
22:40 ---
For 4-byte complex, an option is to check the alignment at runtime.
If the complex is aligned on an 8-byte boundary, it should be
perfectly OK to call the 8-byte-integer routines.
The check could be done wi
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
22:23 ---
The fix in 4.0 was incomplete, it is complete now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18495
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
22:22 ---
Subject: Bug 18495
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-24 22:22:10
Modified files:
libgfortran: Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
22:20 ---
If you uncomment what is in builtins.def, you get both clog and __builtin_clog.
If we define it as DEF_LIB_BUILTIN instead of DEF_C99_BUILTIN, we only get
__builtin_clog.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-24 22:14
---
> We could just define the __builtin_ version of the function.
I don't understand, can you explain? In my understanding everything is in place,
indeed all the other builtins are there, *only* we cannot do that for
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
22:07 ---
We could just define the __builtin_ version of the function.
I keep on wondering if (and when) C++ gets the C99 complex functions and types,
what would they do
about complex log.
Confirmed.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
22:04 ---
All three are now done by PR 15459.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
This builtin, that would be *so* useful in the implementation of std::complex
cannot be enabled at the moment due to this issue (see also builtins.def):
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg00510.html
We should *really* find a way to work around the problem!
(not sure whether the prope
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
21:55 ---
This has been fixed on mainline, still outstanding in 4.0
--
What|Removed |Added
Known
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
21:26 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> as a note: UNPACK also has issues with as scalar mask, maybe also with memory
> allocation
I have just submitted a patch for the memory allocation issue.
A scalar mask for unpack
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
URL|
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24 20:56
---
Created an attachment (id=8964)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8964&action=view)
Minimized test case for struct-layout-1 t199
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21742
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24 20:55
---
Created an attachment (id=8963)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8963&action=view)
Minimized test case for struct-layout-1 test t154.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2174
Generated tests t154 and t199 from gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1 fail
with an ICE compiling c_compat_y_tst.o with -m64 on powerpc64-linux.
The first started failing on 20050424, the second on 20050501, and both
have failed regularly since then, but it seems to be a latent bug
because results for re
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24 20:48
---
Kelley, any chance you can take a look at this? This is most probably related to
the (welcome) changes you did around this time.
-benjamin
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-05-24 20:43 ---
I believe these are all now fixed in the CVS repository. Let me know if I
missed any.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From guptan at hotmail dot com 2005-05-24 20:39
---
Andrew,
I was able to strip the worksround mentioned in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-03/msg00482.html and apply the patch at PR
target/13674 to avoid this bug.
If its of interest, I can post a patch for
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24 20:36
---
This patch looks fine to me. I suggest just posting this, with a ChangeLog
entry, to gcc-patches.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-05-24 20:33
---
This is a duplicate of a dozen other bugs where gcc reports that there is
no declaration even though there are ambiguous ones. Can someone please go
through the list of open PRs and find it? We get a similar P
--- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2005-05-24
20:02 ---
Well no, the standard does not specify how unformatted sequential record markers
are implemented. In short, gfortran uses markers of type off_t, which is 64 bits
on operating systems with large file (LFS) sup
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
19:52 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
We need a configure option to set java.library.path.
Right now libgcjawt.so in installed in ${prefix}/lib.
In FC4 we use java-gcj-compat to create a libjawt.so symlink in
/usr/lib/jvm/jre/lib/i386 (via alternatives).Programs running
System.loadLibrary("jawt") should find this without users ha
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
19:06 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
19:06 ---
Subject: Bug 21645
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-24 19:06:20
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog optimize.c
gcc/tes
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-24
18:28 ---
Invalid, use ::Fx.
Read http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
18:17 ---
I've checked this in to the 4.0 branch and Classpath.
I'm leaving the PR open for now; I will check this in and close it
once the trunk is out of its slushy state.
Thanks for the patch and test case.
--
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
18:16 ---
Subject: Bug 21736
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-24 18:16:11
Modified files:
libjava: Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
18:15 ---
Confirmed, here is some analysis from RTH on IRC:
[16:54] < rth> we hashed a plt entry.
[16:54] < rth> grrr.
[17:30] < tromey> ah
[17:30] < tromey> I'm glad you debugged this then
[17:32] < rth> so the probl
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
18:10 ---
Confirmed, here is a reduced testcase (which is not accepted in 3.3.3 though):
template< template class MetaFunc> struct bind_2;
template struct Fx
{
typedef typename bind_2::template bound::type type;
};
--- Additional Comments From jblomqvi at cc dot hut dot fi 2005-05-24
18:04 ---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg02298.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20846
hi, the following code compiled properly in 3.3.5:
#begin code
/* bind 2nd parameter in a 2 parameters metafunction */
template< template class MetaFunc, typename B>
struct bind_2 {
template
struct bound {
typedef typename MetaFunc::type type;
}; };
template
struct Fx
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
17:46 ---
ok
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot g
AIX 5.2.0 IBM pSeries 9117.570 (Power5 arch)
ML 5200-04
AIX 5XL does not have a libm.a installed by default. I do not have the
package to install it.
Attempting to build gcc-344
./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-shared --enable-threads=aix --enable-
aix64 --disable-nls --disable-checking
--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
17:17 ---
I'm handling this.
Thanks for the test case; looks like there is already one in mauve,
but I'll verify that first.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
16:53 ---
Nathan, this appeared with your binfo work last summer:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00902.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-07/msg00663.html
Could you please have a look?
--
MIPS does not yet have relaxation support in binutils. Instead, in line with
MIPS's own compiler, there is support for small data/bss sections, with
appropriate shorter relocations. What size of data goes in those sections is
determined with the MIPS target specific command line option -G.
However
--- Additional Comments From ferrandi at elet dot polimi dot it 2005-05-24
16:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=8962)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8962&action=view)
i386 assembler of 20040208-2.c.t12.eh.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21737
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
16:27 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
16:18 ---
4.0.0 and 4.1.0 works for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
3.4.0 fails though.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From ferrandi at elet dot polimi dot it 2005-05-24
16:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=8961)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8961&action=view)
preprocessed file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21737
Starting from file 20040208-2.c provided in the gcc testsuite I've obtained an
equivalent version performing an abort.
By changing the following two lines:
Internal = x_0 * 0x0.8000p+2L;
x = Internal;
in
x = x_0 * 0x0.8000
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
15:57 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
15:47 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-05-24
15:45 ---
Regression tested with a updated copy of gcc 4.1 CVS and with patch. Test
summary is available at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg01563.html.
The test failure is gone!
The problem has c
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-24 15:16
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > >So at the moment, you cannot run ggc_collect inside loop opts.
> > >
> > >
> > Is this going to change?
> >
> > If not, I guess removing TODO_ggc_collect is the simpliest thing
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni
dot cz 2005-05-24 15:06 ---
Subject: Re: poisoned ggc memory used for -ftree-vectorize
> >there are several places in loop opts that are not GGC-safe (in
> >particular the tree nodes refered from loop structures
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:46 ---
Even shorter testcase:
template struct A;
struct B
{
template void foo()
{
A::X::Y;
}
};
--
What|Rem
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:35 ---
This is invalid code, the a after the declaration of the namespace is ambiguous.
Confirmed, this is only diagnostic problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:29 ---
This is not a regression, oh and this is much harder to get right which is why
this is a "may"/"might"
warning.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2005-05-24 14:26 ---
Subject: Re: poisoned ggc memory used for -ftree-vectorize
>there are several places in loop opts that are not GGC-safe (in
>particular the tree nodes refered from loop structures are not
>seen
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni
dot cz 2005-05-24 14:24 ---
Subject: Re: poisoned ggc memory used for -ftree-vectorize
> > Is there a rule that ggc_collect should not be called during loop
> optimizations?
>
> I don't know. (Zdenek?)
there a
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:21 ---
Here is a C testcase:
struct a
{
int aa[4];
};
struct b
{
struct a aa;
};
void foo(struct b *bb)
{
int i;
for (i=0; i<4; ++i)
{
struct a *aa = &bb->aa;
struct a *aa1 = aa;
stru
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:20 ---
*** Bug 21670 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20789
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:20 ---
> Looks like it to me too, and I easily could have fallen into the same hole
twice
> because it comes from a use of a shared library.
> Does a single fix make both go away?
One never knows for sure until
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
14:07 ---
Confirmed.
Reduced testcase (-O2 -ftree-vectorize -march=pentium4):
=
struct A
{
int a[4];
int& operator[](int i) { return a[i]; }
};
struct B
--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
13:46 ---
scev_info_str should be ggc_alloc-ed.
Then, the hash table with the cache should be marked with GTY((param_is (struct
scev_info_str)))
If this fixes the bug, you can remove the TODO_ggc_collect from
lowe
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
13:39 ---
Can you provide the preprocessed source?
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
13:36 ---
Patch for 3.4.x: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg02123.html
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-24 12:54
---
> Is there a rule that ggc_collect should not be called during loop
optimizations?
I don't know. (Zdenek?)
I think passes within the loop optimizer can assume that the scev information
cached in the scev ht
--- Additional Comments From paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2005-05-24 11:59 ---
Subject: Re: poisoned ggc memory used for -ftree-vectorize
>Paolo, is the above solution ok with you? If so, I'll go ahead and prepare a
>patch. Alternatively, if ggc_collect is really required
--- Additional Comments From irar at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-24 11:57
---
I committed the patch, since I am not able to reproduce vect-106.c failure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21630
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-05-24 11:53
---
I can reproduce this problem on powerpc-apple-darwin, even without the
options "-maltivec -mabi-altivec" (which means that no simd vectorization takes
place). What happens is that the scalar_evolution_info ha
--- Additional Comments From gbenson at redhat dot com 2005-05-24 10:02
---
Created an attachment (id=8960)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8960&action=view)
Fix
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21736
--- Additional Comments From gbenson at redhat dot com 2005-05-24 10:01
---
Created an attachment (id=8959)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8959&action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21736
Attempting to create a MessageFormat with a "time" element styled as "medium"
raises an exception. The error, in MessageFormat.setLocale(), happens because
DateFormat.DEFAULT has the same value as DateFormat.MEDIUM, and the code was
obviously written with the assumption that this is not the case.
Whe i try to compile with a simple make obtain this error:
g++: Internal error: Terminated (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for istructions.
make: *** [kismet_server.o] Error 1
--
Summary: g++ internal error
Product: gcc
Chris Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> libcpp/configure falls over on a Solaris 9 machine (not tested on
> others)
Thanks for the report. This used to be PR bootstrap/21230 and has been already
fixed a few days ago, for both GCC 4.1.0 and GCC 4.0.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-24
09:27 ---
Can you provide one preprocessed source of those many?
--
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-24 08:38
---
Indeed, Benjamin, I also get this, and that't why probably the issue is not
serious as I was afraid it was. However, we are basically relying on inlining
to happen for this to work, and that's brittle (as Jonathan
--- Additional Comments From Ulrich dot Windl at rz dot uni-regensburg dot
de 2005-05-24 08:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=8958)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8958&action=view)
Log file with revised source, disassemblies for both compilers
I've revised the source
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24
08:12 ---
Fixed by Ulrich's patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg00950.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-05/msg01066.html
--
What|Removed |Added
-
libcpp/configure falls over on a Solaris 9 machine (not tested on
others)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] libcpp]1% uname -a
SunOS taskmaster 5.9 Generic_118558-06 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240
[EMAIL PROTECTED] libcpp]0%
Adding quotes to the appropriate line fixes the problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] libcpp]1% di
Segfault on compilation of following source:
struct _matrix {
double lineardata[4 * 4];
double & operator()(int row, int col = 0) {
return lineardata[col * 4 + row];
}
};
struct matrix : public _matrix {
typedef _matrix parent;
double & operator()(int row, int col = 0)
{ return
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-24 07:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=8957)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8957&action=view)
/tmp/filecmp.i.bz2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21733
if I understand the code flow in FileCmpCmd correctly,
the first loop will initialize n1 and n2 because e1 = e2 = 0,
and k1 && k2 is always < BSIZE.
Even if the read() will return an error, the last check
to return either TCL_ERROR or TCL_OK is not undefined.
This is from http://ozlabs.org/~paulu
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
