https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61891
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61892
Bug ID: 61892
Summary: RVO not occurs with constructor with universal
reference arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61891
Bug ID: 61891
Summary: line-map.c: file "" left but not entered
during `cabal install -p haskell-src-exts`
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
--- Comment #7 from Mike Stump ---
So when you compose the svn comments, compose them from a cut and paste of sed
20q ChangeLog, exactly. In this case, you did this:
rs6000: fix for PR61396 (wide-int fallout)
CONSTANT_P is true for more than j
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42857
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Ayer ---
Any word on if this will be fixed in GCC? To summarize, GCC's current behavior
is wrong because:
* Underflowing after ignoring the requested number of bytes could block
forever, breaking applications.
* The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61890
Bug ID: 61890
Summary: [4.10 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-23.C FAILs with
-O2 -fno-devirtualize-speculatively
-fno-guess-branch-probability
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61667
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fdumont at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61802
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 33177
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33177&action=edit
Proposed patch
I guess the problem is that error_mark_node is special cased in varasm to send
symbols to BSS for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55701
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Wed Jul 23 16:02:15 2014
New Revision: 212948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert r212893:
PR target/55701
* config/arm/arm.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61685
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 23 14:27:55 2014
New Revision: 212942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove redundant tests
PR libgcc/61685
* bid128_fma.c (rou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61889
Bug ID: 61889
Summary: [4.10 Regression] gcov-tool.c uses nftw, ftw.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61396
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61832
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
Summary|r212638 break
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61888
Bug ID: 61888
Summary: Wrong results with SIZEOF and assumed-rank arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid, wrong-code
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Fully preprocessed glibc fread stuff (reduced testcase drops main path
and a prototype for __fread_chk):
extern size_t __fread_chk (void *__restrict __ptr, size_t __ptrlen,
size_t __size, size_t __n,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61853
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
Summary|[4.9,4.10 Regr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61867
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61870
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Old value = 12 '\f'
New value = 16 '\020'
init_adjust_machine_modes () at insn-modes.c:1069
1066 /* config/i386/i386-modes.def:34 */
1067 s = TARGET_128BIT_LONG_DOUBLE ? 16 : 12;
1068 mode_siz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61846
--- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> C99 also has this requirement. But C89 did not.
The warnings are "best effort" anyway. So even if the standards did *not* say
that, gcc could skip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61872
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61876
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61884
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61885
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Fails LTO bootstrap with
/abuild/rguenther/obj/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/abuild/rguenther/obj/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++
-B/abuild/rguenther/obj/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
It looks like a pretty old issue. E.g. on
void
foo (void)
{
__FILE__;
"foo";
}
4.8 says:
r.c: In function ‘foo’:
r.c:4:1: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
__FILE__;
^
r.c:5:3: warn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
--- Comment #1 from Marat Zakirov ---
This issue is suitible for ARM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61887
Bug ID: 61887
Summary: vect.exp UNRESOLVED tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61884
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.4
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, it seems that at the point we merge in lto-symtab.c the cgraph nodes are
not yet populated. Neither of the two candidates are marked as alias.
So maybe the wrong thing already happens earlier, during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886
Bug ID: 61886
Summary: [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] LTO breaks fread with
_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61861
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61885
Bug ID: 61885
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: in types_same_for_odr, at
ipa-devirt.c:383 with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #56 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #55)
> On July 17, 2014 6:13:14 PM CEST, "thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org"
> wrote:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
> >
> >--- Comment #53 from
45 matches
Mail list logo
