https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Roland Schulz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roland at rschulz dot eu
--- Comment #25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #24 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 26 May 2014, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
>
> --- Comment #23 from vincenzo Innocente
> ---
> Which Syntax?
> I want to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #23 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Which Syntax?
I want to reuse the same code for the various architecture and let gcc deal
with vectorization details.
The best I manage to do to share code is something like this
namespace {
inline
flo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sun, 25 May 2014, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
>
> vincenzo Innocente changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.9.1
--- Comment #21 from vincenzo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #20 from davidxl 2012-05-10 20:45:58
UTC ---
Auto Cloning is an independent feature. What is requested here is an extension
of a previous auto clone patch by Sri (which is based on command line option
-mversion=...).
David
(In repl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #19 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-10 16:51:33 UTC ---
On 10 May, 2012, at 6:48 PM, tmsriram at google dot com wrote:
>> As you notice the source code is identical as I'm exploiting compiler
>> autovectorization here.
>> In this cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #18 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-05-10
16:48:45 UTC ---
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:16 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
>
> --- Comment #17 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2012-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #17 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-10 10:16:13 UTC ---
I tested this
float x[1024], y[1024], z[1024], w[1024];
void foo() {
for (int i=0; i!=1024; ++i)
x[i]=y[i]*z[i]+w[i];
}
void __attribute__ ((target("arch=corei7"))) fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #16 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-05-09
19:03:01 UTC ---
Bug fixed, patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00694.html
Thanks for trying,
-Sri.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:18 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #15 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-05-08
17:09:43 UTC ---
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:18 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
>
> --- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2012-05
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #14 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-08 09:18:01 UTC ---
added your patch on top of
c++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=c++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/afs/cern.ch/user/i/innocent/w2/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.8.0/lto-wrapper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #13 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-05-07
17:04:05 UTC ---
Here is the patch to do function multiversioning which is under review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00078.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #12 from Sriraman Tallam 2012-05-07
16:54:57 UTC ---
Will do, thanks.
-Sri.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:05 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
>
> --- Comment #11 from vince
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-05-07 13:05:18 UTC ---
Please post on this PR when a version of 4.8 exists that supports the feature
(I saw several patches proposed and even committed)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #10 from Sriraman Tallam 2011-10-28
17:28:23 UTC ---
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 7:00 AM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
>
> --- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2011-10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-10-28 14:00:18 UTC ---
That's a pity.
It would be very useful though to have at least a patch to test so that we can
have something to use in prototypes and eventually a working solution for 4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-28 09:14:29 UTC ---
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
>
> --- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2011-10-28
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #7 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-10-28 09:06:30 UTC ---
sorry to ping again.
Stage 1 is supposed to end Nov 7th.
Will the new feature work out by Sri make for 4.7?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #6 from davidxl 2011-07-23 17:28:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Any news on this item?
> Is this feature still foreseen for 4.7?
> A patch to test for instance.
Sri is working on this. He will post a formal specification of f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-07-23 13:29:36 UTC ---
Any news on this item?
Is this feature still foreseen for 4.7?
A patch to test for instance.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-06-11 07:06:24 UTC ---
Thanks for the clarification, waiting for some patch/branch to test.
please keep me posted (or let me know with PR I shall watch).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmsriram at google dot com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-06-11 05:58:46 UTC ---
These new developments sound interesting. Hope somebody is working on it and
will publish a testable version soon.
On the other hand I was thinking more of exploiting auto-vectori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
26 matches
Mail list logo