https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14494
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14494
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bkoz at redhat dot com,|jason at gcc dot
gnu.org,
--- Comment #5 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-05-24 15:09 ---
Subject: Re: Rejected valid specialization of member template
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 09:51
> ---
> The case with A<0>::B() in
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 09:51
---
The case with A<0>::B() instead of A<0>::B() which was also
rejected was fixed with Mark's patch for PR20173.
The original testcase with A<0>::B() still fails, though.
Mark, would you mind having a look at this o
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23
18:36 ---
*** Bug 20174 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
