Le dimanche 20 février 2011 00:46:07, Marius Jigmond a écrit :
> Should it then match http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3844/esriwkt/
> because it does not seem to? I apologize if my questions seem silly.
With all respect due to the great job of that site, I'm not sure you can
blindly trust sp
Should it then match http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3844/esriwkt/
because it does not seem to? I apologize if my questions seem silly.
-marius
On Sun, 2011-02-20 at 00:38 +0100, Even Rouault wrote:
> Le dimanche 20 février 2011 00:24:16, Marius Jigmond a écrit :
> >
> > Is the disconnect
Le dimanche 20 février 2011 00:24:16, Marius Jigmond a écrit :
>
> Is the disconnect simply a reporting issue and reprojections are handled
> properly behind the scenes when using this EPSG code? It seems that what
> gdalinfo reports is in accordance to
> http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/3844/
Hi Even,
I'm not trying to re-ignite the stereo debate but I think there's more
to the issue with the warning. I've realized that the particular EPSG
code 3844 (not sure about others) is reported totally different by
ogrinfo and gdalinfo. It's not the actual reporting that's wrong but the
way -a_s