Hi Darren
You can do this by setting `GDAL_DISABLE_READDIR_ON_OPEN=EMPTY_DIR` or by
narrowing the allowed extension with "CPL_VSIL_CURL_ALLOWED_EXTENSIONS=.tif"
Kyle is working on some docs that explains those env in TiTiler:
-
https://github.com/developmentseed/titiler/blob/0a5288de30845865256
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 6:55 PM Even Rouault
wrote:
> Frank,
>
> Even,
>
> I'm -1 on this motion as it stands. There are a quite a few formats that
> I think we ought to continue to support for archival purposes
> indefinitely including FIT, JDEM, GMT, DOQ1/2, LAN, MFF, NDF, SDTS, SGI,
> XPM, and
In https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio/issues/2119#issuecomment-790024225
I've noted how s3-COG reads can use retries to handle s3 rate throttling
(503) by enabling the `GDAL_HTTP_MAX_RETRY`. Our dataset on s3 only
contains *.tif files and we need to prevent GDAL from issuing any GET/HEAD
requests
Frank,
Even,
I'm -1 on this motion as it stands. There are a quite a few formats
that I think we ought to continue to support for archival purposes
indefinitely including FIT, JDEM, GMT, DOQ1/2, LAN, MFF, NDF, SDTS,
SGI, XPM, and TIGER. I am prepared to be listed as supporting
maintainer f
Even,
I'm -1 on this motion as it stands. There are a quite a few formats that I
think we ought to continue to support for archival purposes
indefinitely including FIT, JDEM, GMT, DOQ1/2, LAN, MFF, NDF, SDTS, SGI,
XPM, and TIGER. I am prepared to be listed as supporting maintainer for
these driv
Even Rouault writes:
>> But, I'm worried about something different. As a packager, I'd like to
>> know that unless I take the affirmative step of passing --enable-foo,
>> for any GPLish or proprietary foo, I won't end up with a gdal build
>> linked with foo just because it happened to be presen
I have to agree with the comments about Surfer and GS7. I was given a file
in that format only last week.
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 20:40, Even Rouault
wrote:
> > Deprecate JPEG2000
> >
> > Is there something the openjpeg2 driver can't do that Jasper can? Can
> > it be removed?
>
> I'm not aware o
Thanks Even for the follow up and description of the work-around, will
try it right now.
Ron
On 4/03/2021 8:11 am, Even Rouault wrote:
Hi,
This is a "well known" behaviour of gdal_grid in which it writes
raster with a bottom-left corner origin, whereas most other GDAL
utilities use a top-l
Hi,
This is a "well known" behaviour of gdal_grid in which it writes raster
with a bottom-left corner origin, whereas most other GDAL utilities use
a top-left corner origin. The ERS driver doesn't support such
convention. The workaround you can use is to output gdal_grid as a TIFF
(tmp.tif),
Looks to me like the ERMapper ERS driver has a bug, using the bottom
left corner to georef the raster, instead of top left. I can only use it
if I use local coordinates, any negative northings are plotted towards
the north. ERS is the main raster format I use.
I am happy to assist in sorting o
Folks,
When Andrew first mentioned RFC 34 I skimmed it and was a bit surprised it
existed though perhaps it seemed a wee bit familiar. Now that Even
mentions it was not ever implemented I see that *I* proposed it and
presumably did not actually follow up on implementing it or getting it
adopted.
> Deprecate JPEG2000
Is there something the openjpeg2 driver can't do that Jasper can? Can
it be removed?
I'm not aware of things that Jasper/JPEG2000 can do that JP2OpenJPEG
can't. But there are definitely binary distributions still using it, and
not yet JP2OpenJPEG. The deprecation hint
Thanks Even! Hurray for cleanup! Some thoughts looking at the list:
> SEGY
Makes me sad, but I've never seen anyone use it. I've done seismic work
but never needed it. +1 to nuke it.
> E00GRID
I keep running into E00 data from the USGS, but it's mostly been vector
data. I'm +0 on removing t
Hi,
https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc34_license_policy.html
As indicated in the top of the RFC, its status is "development" (draft),
which here means stalled/non-adopted given that it was proposed long
time ago. So there's no runtime mechanism to control license compatibility.
But, I'm
I wrote the Cloudant driver (though it extends the CouchDB driver), it was
very useful! However afaik it is no longer being used. Though I no longer
work with CouchDB I see very little mention of geospatial and CouchDB
nowadays on their mailing lists.
I agree with the list of drivers proposed for
Le 03/03/2021 à 21:20, Ivan Lucena a écrit :
Even,
Is the INGR driver for Integraph raster install needed?
It was developed when the format was already deprecated.
It was supposed to read old files and there was some old hardware,
scanner, spitting out in that file format.
I'll add it to t
still (not install)
From: gdal-dev on behalf of Ivan Lucena
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 3:20 PM
To: Even Rouault ; Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís
; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: remove and deprecate a few drivers
Even,
Is the INGR d
Even,
Is the INGR driver for Integraph raster install needed?
It was developed when the format was already deprecated.
It was supposed to read old files and there was some old hardware, scanner,
spitting out in that file format.
Regards,
Ivan
From: gdal-dev o
Andrew C Aitchison writes:
> On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
>> I also was unclear on the optional driver situation. Certainly if
>> drivers can link with proprietary libraries, there is absolutely no
>> reason to object to a driver because it links so an AGPL3 library.
>>
>> I believe
OK, I amend my motion to keep GS7BG as non-deprecated for now. Let's
mark GSAG and GSBG as deprecated and see if that triggers reactions once
this is in the wild.
Le 03/03/2021 à 20:55, Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís a écrit :
Is the GSAG format really used ?
What can I say. Because it's a simple
> Is the GSAG format really used ?
What can I say. Because it's a simple format I used to have colleagues that
used it for I/O of their codes and not rarely it ended up in my hands. But
can't honestly say it's much used.
> Which one(s) are proposed by default as output of current Surfer vers
Is the GSAG format really used ?
Which one(s) are proposed by default as output of current Surfer versions ?
Can't Surfer export to other formats already handled by GDAL ?
Le 03/03/2021 à 20:02, Joaquim Manuel Freire Luís a écrit :
Even,
May you reconsider the Golden Software drivers --- GS7B
Even,
May you reconsider the Golden Software drivers --- GS7BG, GSAG, GSBG --- ?
GMT can read/write GSBG, but specially GS7BG, besides Surfer, GDAL is the only
one that I know that is able to read this format. Maybe not in this list but
there are still many people who use Golden software grid fo
Hi,
Following the discussions of past weeks, I motion to:
- remove the vector drivers BNA, AeronavFAA, HTF, OpenAir, SEGUKOOA,
SEGY, SUA, XPlane and raster drivers BPG, E00GRID, EPSILON,
IGNFHeightASCIIGrid, NTv1. They have all been authored by myself and I'm
not aware of them having been muc
24 matches
Mail list logo