Thanks to all for your reply! :-)
Specially to Peter Clifton's, Stefan Salewski's and Tibor Palinkas's
answers.
PS: seems that everybody use Vim or Emacs! Is that a must? ;-) Maybe I
should start using one of them... Does anybody use [1]Geany? (which is
the one I'm actually
Why not giving Code::Blocks a try? I was told that C::B is especially
good for Gtk. Never tried though...
Miguel Sánchez de León Peque wrote:
Thanks to all for your reply! :-)
Specially to Peter Clifton's, Stefan Salewski's and Tibor Palinkas's
answers.
PS: seems that everybody
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 18:17 +0300, Justas Poderys wrote:
Why not giving Code::Blocks a try? I was told that C::B is especially
good for Gtk. Never tried though...
I have used Code::Blocks in Windoze for academic purposes once, and I
think it's the most Windoze-Similar way to write code on
On Apr 23, 2010, at 5:00 AM, Miguel Sánchez de León Peque wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a student interested in contributing to gEDA and learn some C ;-).
The biggest problem I find any time I start coding is how should I
write this?. You're always talking about deprecated code, libraries
Miguel,
I don't want to hurt you, how ever, the order of your first sentence
reads very wrong to me: learn a lot of C programming, good coding style
(there are dedicted styleguides for this, just google), then contribute
to a pretty complex program.
An introductory book on ANSI-C is good to
Maybe
there's no book for that, it's just programming experience... am I
right? (I hope not! xD)
Thanks in advance,
A student who is a bit confused about which is good modern C
programming style... :-)
I don't think there is any such thing. These days coders type first and
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:00 +0200, Miguel Sánchez de León Peque wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a student interested in contributing to gEDA and learn some C ;-).
The biggest problem I find any time I start coding is how should I
write this?. You're always talking about deprecated code, libraries
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 13:00 +0200, Miguel Sánchez de León Peque wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a student interested in contributing to gEDA and learn some C ;-).
For C and GTK the book
Andrew Krause: Foundations of GTK+ Development may be a starting point.
just get used to typing
gtk_ridiculously_long_function_names_with_lots_of_underscores() and
wearing your keyboard out since not a single IDE under Lunix would
have code complete or any other code editor improvements us Windows
programmers have been taking for granted for years.
-tc
On Fri, Apr
timecop wrote:
just get used to typing
gtk_ridiculously_long_function_names_with_lots_of_underscores() and
wearing your keyboard out since not a single IDE under Lunix would
have code complete or any other code editor improvements us Windows
programmers have been taking for granted for years.
On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:47 AM, timecop wrote:
just get used to typing
gtk_ridiculously_long_function_names_with_lots_of_underscores() and
wearing your keyboard out since not a single IDE under Lunix would
have code complete or any other code editor improvements us Windows
programmers have been
On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
I think the trick is to use rich APIs such as GLib - rather than
exclusively using the string.h, stdlib.h stuff provided in the C
standard.
The GLib routines take care of a lot of memory management relating to
strings, and make like a lot easier
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:42 -0400, Jason wrote:
timecop wrote:
just get used to typing
gtk_ridiculously_long_function_names_with_lots_of_underscores() and
wearing your keyboard out since not a single IDE under Lunix would
have code complete or any other code editor improvements us
On Apr 23, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Jason wrote:
As an FYI, Unix folks have been using this since before GUIs were
an itch in Bill Gates pants... I'm just sayin' ;-)
Indeed, UNIX folk have been using GUIs since GUIs were an itch in
Gates' pants.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:31 -0400, Dave McGuire wrote:
There
is nothing worse than an optimised parser looping over memory with
constructs like if (*i++ == '(') ... or some such.
Is this why GTK apps tend to be so unbelievably bloated?
I mean, I see (and like!) the value of such
Oh bull. Lots of IDEs (and just plain text editors) do that just
fine. There's *nothing* about software development of any kind that
is unique to or first appeared in Microsoft Windows.
-Dave
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Miguel S?nchez de Le?n Peque wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a student interested in contributing to gEDA and learn some C ;-).
The biggest problem I find any time I start coding is how should I
write this?. You're always talking about deprecated code,
Ouabache Designworks wrote:
Other than Bob and Clippy is there anything of any kind that
is unique to or first appeared in Microsoft Windows?
BSOD?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
On Apr 23, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Jason wrote:
Other than Bob and Clippy is there anything of any kind that
is unique to or first appeared in Microsoft Windows?
BSOD?
Manufacturer-recommended periodic reboots to maintain stability?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL
Ouabache Designworks wrote:
Oh bull. Lots of IDEs (and just plain text editors) do that just
fine. There's *nothing* about software development of any kind that
is unique to or first appeared in Microsoft Windows.
-Dave
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jim j...@k4gvo.com wrote:
I have yet to see anyone demonstrate the blue screen of death on Linux.
Black and white, yes but blue was unique.
To be fair, it can be invoked on demand as part of xscreensaver.
--
- Charles Lepple
On Apr 23, 2010, at 6:47 AM, timecop time...@gmail.com wrote:
just get used to typing
gtk_ridiculously_long_function_names_with_lots_of_underscores() and
wearing your keyboard out since not a single IDE under Lunix would
have code complete or any other code editor improvements us Windows
22 matches
Mail list logo