---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1660/#review3988
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Andreas Sandberg
On Jan. 22, 2013, 1:49 p.m., Ali
> On Jan. 24, 2013, 9:14 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > What's the point of the avoidQuiesceLiveLock flag? Is there anything
> > preventing us from doing a squashAfter whenever there is an interrupt
> > pending and interrupts are turned on again?
>
> Ali Saidi wrote:
> You will be throw
> On Jan. 24, 2013, 9:14 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > What's the point of the avoidQuiesceLiveLock flag? Is there anything
> > preventing us from doing a squashAfter whenever there is an interrupt
> > pending and interrupts are turned on again?
>
> Ali Saidi wrote:
> You will be throw
> On Jan. 24, 2013, 9:14 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > What's the point of the avoidQuiesceLiveLock flag? Is there anything
> > preventing us from doing a squashAfter whenever there is an interrupt
> > pending and interrupts are turned on again?
>
> Ali Saidi wrote:
> You will be throw
> On Jan. 24, 2013, 9:14 a.m., Andreas Sandberg wrote:
> > What's the point of the avoidQuiesceLiveLock flag? Is there anything
> > preventing us from doing a squashAfter whenever there is an interrupt
> > pending and interrupts are turned on again?
You will be throwing away perfectly good ins
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1660/#review3968
---
Ship it!
Solves the problem :-)
- Andreas Hansson
On Jan. 22, 2013, 1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1660/#review3895
---
What's the point of the avoidQuiesceLiveLock flag? Is there anything prev
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1660/
---
Review request for Default.
Description
---
Changeset 9513:86c772cdcb3e
--
