I think this may not be quite right, or I'm misunderstanding what Jason is
saying. The Tick number returned in atomic mode is supposed to approximate
how long the access took, and it's up to the caller to do something with
that. Often the caller does throw away the number, but that's what it's
Hello,
If you are using *atomic* memory mode, then the tick number is mostly
ignored. If you're using *timing* mode, then the tick number should be used
by whatever object calls the read/write function and the delay is inserted
there. Also, if your program doesn't have a direct dependence on the
