With 13 +1's from PMC members, the vote passes. I'll update the
language and commit it to the documentation.
-jg
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>> As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
> like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
> of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
+1
+1
Tom
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
> like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
> of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
>
> The rationale:
> Feature branches
+1
Cheers,
Nige
On Jul 12, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Stack wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> +1 Sounds good to me.
>>
>> Something like the following?
>>
>> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
>>
+1.
Tsz-Wo
From: Stack
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Change bylaws to require 3 binding +1s for branch merge
+1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> +1 Sounds good to
+1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> +1 Sounds good to me.
>
> Something like the following?
>
> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> ==
> Lazy consensus of active committe
On 07/11/2011 05:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> ==
> Lazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of
> -one +1. The code can be committed
+1 from me.
Sounds fine to me. +1
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
> +1
>
> mahadev
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Arun C Murthy
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Arun
> >
> > On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> >
> >> As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching m
+1
mahadev
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote:
> +1
>
> Arun
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>
>> As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
>> like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
>> of three commi
+1
Arun
On Jul 11, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
> like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
> of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
>
> The rationale:
> Feature branches ar
+1
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
> +1 from me as well.
>
> Thanks for running this vote, Jakob.
>
> Aaron
>
> On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
>
> > +1 to Eli's wording.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> >> +1 Sounds good t
+1 from me as well.
Thanks for running this vote, Jakob.
Aaron
On Jul 11, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> +1 to Eli's wording.
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
>> +1 Sounds good to me.
>>
>> Something like the following?
>>
>> Index: main/author/src/documen
+1 to Eli's wording.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Eli Collins wrote:
> +1 Sounds good to me.
>
> Something like the following?
>
> Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
> ==
> Lazy consensus
+1 Sounds good to me.
Something like the following?
Index: main/author/src/documentation/content/xdocs/bylaws.xml
==
Lazy consensus of active committers, but with a minimum of
-one +1. The code can be commi
That's certainly not the intention, although I note that the current
+1 requirement on code changes would apparently allow a committer to
+1 h{is,er} own patch:
"A change made to a codebase of the project and committed by a
committer. This includes source code, documentation, website content,
etc.
To clarify, is there any restriction on who may give the +1s? For example,
if a branch has a group of 5 committers primarily authoring the patches, can
the three +1s be made by a subset of those committers?
-Todd
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
> As discussed in the recent t
As discussed in the recent thread on HDFS-1623 branching models, I'd
like to amend the bylaws to provide that branches should get a minimum
of three committer +1s before being merged to trunk.
The rationale:
Feature branches are often created in order that developers can
iterate quickly without th
18 matches
Mail list logo
